Phantom tones and suppressive masking by active nonlinear oscillation of the hair-cell bundle

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 21, 2012, Pages

  Barral, Jérémie ^a   Martin, Pascal ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Auditory amplification; Combination tones; Hair bundle motility; Tartini tones

Indexed keywords

ION CHANNEL;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY PARAMETERS; HAIR CELL; HOPF BIFURCATION; INNER EAR; OSCILLATION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SOUND; VIBRATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY; HAIR CELLS, VESTIBULAR; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PERIODICITY; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RANA CATESBEIANA; SACCULE AND UTRICLE; SENSORY GATING;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84861452172     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202426109     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Moore BCJ (2004) An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing (Elsevier, London), pp 65-126.
2. Tartini G (1754) Trattato di musica secondo la vera scieza dell'armonia (Kessinger Publishing, Padova), Treatise on music according to the true science of harmony. Italian.
3. Goldstein JL (1967) Auditory nonlinearity. J Acoust Soc Am 41:676-689.
4. Patuzzi RB, Yates GK, Johnstone BM (1989) Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 42:47-72. (Pubitemid 19262730)
5. Lukashkin AN, Russell IJ (1999) Analysis of the f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion components generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer: Dependence on the amplitudes of the primaries and feedback gain. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2661-2668.
6. Howard J, Hudspeth AJ (1988) Compliance of the hair bundle associatedwith gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Neuron 1:189-199.
7. Jaramillo F, Markin VS, Hudspeth AJ (1993) Auditory illusions and the single hair cell. Nature 364:527-529. (Pubitemid 23273096)
8. Smoorenburg GF (1972) Combination tones and their origin. J Acoust Soc Am 52:615-632.
9. Ruggero MA, Robles L, Rich NC (1992) Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: Mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. J Neurophysiol 68:1087-1099.
10. Robles L, Ruggero MA, Rich NC (1997) Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. J Neurophysiol 77:2385-2399. (Pubitemid 27209211)
11. Robles L, Ruggero MA (2001) Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81:1305-1352. (Pubitemid 32606671)
12. Kim DO, Molnar CE, Matthews JW (1980) Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 67:1704-1721. (Pubitemid 10057839)
13. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1991) A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2027-2067.
14. Meenderink SW, van Dijk P (2004) Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens. Hear Res 192:107-118. (Pubitemid 38639837)
15. Vassilakis PN, Meenderink SW, Narins PM (2004) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide clues hearing mechanisms in the frog ear. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3713-3726. (Pubitemid 40029951)
16. Manley GA, Köppl C, Johnstone BM (1993) Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. I: General characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am 93:2820-2833. (Pubitemid 23143509)
17. Manley GA (2001) Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in non-mammals. J Neurophysiol 86:541-549.
18. Hudspeth AJ (2008) Making an effort to listen: Mechanical amplification in the ear. Neuron 59:530-545.
19. Martin P, Hudspeth AJ (1999) Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cell's response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:14306-14311. (Pubitemid 30000646)
20. Martin P, Hudspeth AJ (2001) Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundle's active response to mechanical stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14386-14391. (Pubitemid 33121401)
21. Martin P (2008) Active Processes and Otoacoustic Emissions in Hearing, eds GA Manley, AN Popper, and RR Fay (Springer, New York), pp 93-143.
22. Manley GA, Kirk DL, Koppl C, Yates GK (2001) In vivo evidence for a cochlear amplifier in the hair-cell bundle of lizards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2826-2831. (Pubitemid 32209568)
23. Kennedy HJ, Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (2005) Force generation by mammalian hair bundles supports a role in cochlear amplification. Nature 433:880-883. (Pubitemid 40314898)
24. 2+ current-driven nonlinear amplification by the mammalian cochlea in vitro. Nat Neurosci 8:149-155.
25. Ashmore J (2008) Cochlear outer hair cell motility. Physiol Rev 88:173-210.
26. Dallos P, et al. (2008) Prestin-based outer hair cell motility is necessary for mammalian cochlear amplification. Neuron 58:333-339. (Pubitemid 351615184)
27. Mellado Lagarde MM, Drexl M, Lukashkina VA, Lukashkin AN, Russell IJ (2008) Outer hair cell somatic, not hair bundle, motility is the basis of the cochlear amplifier. Nat Neurosci 11:746-748. (Pubitemid 351896671)
28. Peng AW, Ricci AJ (2011) Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification? Hear Res 273:109-122.
29. Barral J, Martin P (2011) The physical basis of active mechanosensitivity by the hair-cell bundle. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19:369-375.
30. Ashmore J, et al. (2010) The remarkable cochlear amplifier. Hear Res 266:1-17.
31. Nobili R, Mammano F (1996) Biophysics of the cochlea. II: Stationary nonlinear phenomenology. J Acoust Soc Am 99:2244-2255.
32. O'Maoileidigh D, Jülicher F (2010) The interplay between active hair bundle motility and electromotility in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 128:1175-1190.
33. Martin P, Bozovic D, Choe Y, Hudspeth AJ (2003) Spontaneous oscillation by hair bundles of the bullfrog's sacculus. J Neurosci 23:4533-4548. (Pubitemid 36706184)
34. Martin P, Hudspeth AJ, Jülicher F (2001) Comparison of a hair bundle's spontaneous oscillations with its response to mechanical stimulation reveals the underlying active process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14380-14385. (Pubitemid 33121400)
35. Tinevez JY, Jülicher F, Martin P (2007) Unifying the various incarnations of active hair-bundle motility by the vertebrate hair cell. Biophys J 93:4053-4067. (Pubitemid 350223820)
36. Manley GA, Sienknecht U, Koppl C (2004) Calcium modulates the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail skink. J Neurophysiol 92:2685-2693. (Pubitemid 40340481)
37. Martin P, Mehta AD, Hudspeth AJ (2000) Negative hair-bundle stiffness betrays a mechanism for mechanical amplification by the hair cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12026-12031.
38. Eguíluz VM, Ospeck M, Choe Y, Hudspeth AJ, Magnasco MO (2000) Essential nonlinearities in hearing. Phys Rev Lett 84:5232-5235.
39. 2+ to mechanoelectrical-transduction channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15321-15326.
40. Camalet S, Duke T, Jülicher F, Prost J (2000) Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3183-3188. (Pubitemid 30183276)
41. Duke T, Jülicher F (2008) Active Processes and Otoacoustic Emissions, eds GA Manley, AN Popper, and RR Fay (Springer, New York), pp 63-92.
42. Strogatz ST (1997) Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
43. Stoop R, Kern A (2004) Two-tone suppression and combination tone generation as computations performed by the Hopf cochlea. Phys Rev Lett 93:268103.
44. Jülicher F, Andor D, Duke T (2001) Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9080-9085. (Pubitemid 32743872)
45. Nadrowski B, Martin P, Jülicher F (2004) Active hair-bundle motility harnesses noise to operate near an optimum of mechanosensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12195-12200. (Pubitemid 39145419)
46. Jülicher F, Dierkes K, Lindner B, Prost J, Martin P (2009) Spontaneous movements and linear response of a noisy oscillator. Eur Phys J E 29:449-460.
47. Hudspeth AJ, Jülicher F, Martin P (2010) A critique of the critical cochlea: Hopf - a bifurcation - is better than none. J Neurophysiol 104:1219-1229.
48. Frolenkov GI, Belyantseva IA, Kurc M, Mastroianni MA, Kachar B (1998) Cochlear hair cell electromotility can provide force for both low and high intensity distortion product otoacoustic emission. Hear Res 126:67-74. (Pubitemid 29003093)
49. Liberman MC, Zuo J, Guinan JJ, Jr (2004) Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am 116:1649-1655. (Pubitemid 39202577)
50. Dierkes K, Lindner B, Jülicher F (2008) Enhancement of sensitivity gain and frequency tuning by coupling of active hair bundles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:18669-18674.
51. Barral J, Dierkes K, Lindner B, Jülicher F, Martin P (2010) Coupling a sensory hair-cell bundle to cyber clones enhances nonlinear amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8079-8084.
52. Kozlov AS, Baumgart J, Risler T, Versteegh CP, Hudspeth AJ (2011) Forces between clustered stereocilia minimize friction in the ear on a subnanometre scale. Nature 474:376-379.