Robotic assessment of sensorimotor deficits after traumatic brain injury

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 58-67

  Debert, Chantel T ^a   Herter, Troy M ^b   Scott, Stephen H ^b   Dukelow, Sean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

proprioception; reaching; rehabilitation; robotics; traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDER; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861423179     PISSN: 15570576     EISSN: 15570584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318254bd4f     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Campbell M. Understanding Traumatic Brain Injury. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
2. Liss M, Willer B. Traumatic brain injury and marital relationships: a literature review. Int J Rehabil Res. 1990; 13 (4): 309-320.
3. Thurman DJ, Alverson C, Dunn KA, Guerrero J, Sniezek JE. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999; 14 (6): 602-615. (Pubitemid 30027268)
4. Zaloshnja E,Miller T, Langlois JA, Selassie AW. Prevalence of long-term disability from traumatic brain injury in the civilian population of the United States, 2005. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008; 23 (6): 394-400.
5. Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits,Hospitalizations and Deaths 2002-2006. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010.
6. Chaplin D, Deitz J, Jaffe KM. Motor performance in children after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74 (2): 161-164. (Pubitemid 23059301)
7. Haaland KY, Temkin N, Randahl G, Dikmen S. Recovery of simple motor skills after head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994; 16 (3): 448-456. (Pubitemid 24183915)
8. Gray C, Cantagallo A, Della Sala S, Basaglia N. Bradykinesia and bradyphrenia revisited: patterns of subclinical deficit in motor speed and cognitive functioning in head-injured patients with good recovery. Brain Inj. 1998; 12 (5): 429-441. (Pubitemid 28190615)
9. Incoccia C, Formisano R, Muscato P, Reali G, Zoccolotti P. Reaction and movement times in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury with good motor recovery. Cortex. 2004; 40 (1): 111-115. (Pubitemid 38380489)
10. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Hoppe B, Golge M, Dreesmann M, Damm-Stunitz U, Ritz A. Sensorimotor recovery in children after traumatic brain injury: analyses of gait, grossmotor, and finemotor skills. DevMed Child Neurol. 2003; 45 (12): 821-828. (Pubitemid 37461162)
11. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Stolze H, Golge M, Ritz A. Analyses of gait, reaching, and grasping in children after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84 (3): 424-430. (Pubitemid 36297743)
12. Gagnon I, Forget R, Sullivan SJ, Friedman D. Motor performance following a mild traumatic brain injury in children: an exploratory study. Brain Inj. 1998; 12 (10): 843-853. (Pubitemid 28444821)
13. Walker WC, Pickett TC.Motor impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinalmulticenter study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007; 44 (7): 975-982.
14. Scott SH, Dukelow SP. Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48 (4): 335-354.
15. Dobkin BH, Dorsch A. The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25 (9): 788-798.
16. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 1994; 14 (5 Pt 2): 3208-3224. (Pubitemid 24139004)
17. Singh K, Scott SH. A motor learning strategy reflects neural circuitry for limb control. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6 (4): 399-403. (Pubitemid 36373986)
18. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Q&A: Robotics as a tool to understand the brain. BMC Biol. 2010; 8: 92.
19. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974; 2 (7872): 81-84.
20. Bickley LS, Szilagyi PG. Bates' Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. 9th ed. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
21. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987; 67 (2): 206-207. (Pubitemid 17026064)
22. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9 (1): 97-113.
23. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7 (1): 13-31.
24. Tiffin J, Asher EJ. The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol. 1948; 32 (3): 234-247.
25. Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P. Levels of Cognitive Functioning. Downey, CA: Rancho Los Amigos Hospital; 1972.
26. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53 (4): 695-699. (Pubitemid 41623495)
27. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987; 68 (2): 98-102. (Pubitemid 17017760)
28. Coderre AM, Zeid AA, Dukelow SP, et al. Assessment of upper-limb sensorimotor function of subacute stroke patients using visually guided reaching. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24 (6): 528-541.
29. Scott SH. Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching. J Neurosci Methods. 1999; 89 (2): 119-127. (Pubitemid 29361506)
30. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, et al. Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24 (2): 178-187.
31. Gladstone DJ,Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment ofmotor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002; 16 (3): 232-240. (Pubitemid 34984898)
32. Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P. The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin Rehabil. 1991; 5: 273-282.
33. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Coderre AM, Scott SH. Position sense impairments are largely independent of visumotor deficits following stroke. Paper presented at: Society for Neuroscience, 2009; Chicago, IL.
34. Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JP. Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22 (4): 321-329. (Pubitemid 351852642)
35. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI. Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle finger. J Physiol. 1976; 260 (2): 387-407.
36. Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB. Proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle vibration: contribution bymuscle spindles to perception? Science. 1972; 175 (28): 1382-1384.
37. Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB. The persistence of appreciable kinesthesia after paralysing joint afferents but preserving muscle afferents. Brain Res. 1972; 37 (2): 326-329.
38. Matthews PB. Where does Sherrington's "muscular sense" originate? Muscles, joints, corollary discharges? Annu Rev Neurosci. 1982; 5: 189-218.
39. Carey LM, Oke LE, Matyas TA. Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77 (12): 1271-1278. (Pubitemid 26424841)
40. Goble DJ, Lewis CA, Hurvitz EA, Brown SH. Development of upper limb proprioceptive accuracy in children and adolescents. Hum Mov Sci. 2005; 24 (2): 155-170. (Pubitemid 41194638)
41. Collins DF, Refshauge KM, Todd G, Gandevia SC. Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94 (3): 1699-1706. (Pubitemid 41192843)
42. Adamo DE, Alexander NB, Brown SH. The influence of age and physical activity on upper limb proprioceptive ability. J Aging Phys Act. 2009; 17 (3): 272-293.