Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 961-972

  Raichle, Katherine A ^a,b   Hanley, Marisol A ^b   Molton, Ivan ^b   Kadel, Nancy J ^b   Campbell, Kellye ^b   Phelps, Emily ^b   Ehde, Dawn ^b   Smith, Douglas G ^b  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Amputation; Demographics; Etiology; Factors; Limb; Pain; Phantom; Prosthesis; Prosthetic rehabilitation; Residual; Use

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; DEMOGRAPHICS; ETIOLOGY; FACTORS; LIMB; PAIN; PHANTOM; PROSTHESIS; RESIDUAL; USE;

EMPLOYMENT; PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS;

ADULT; AGED; ARM AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LEG AMPUTATION; LIMB PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; PHANTOM PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; ADOLESCENT; AGNOSIA; AMPUTATION; ARM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; LEG; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN; TRAUMATIC AMPUTATION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMPUTATION; AMPUTATION, TRAUMATIC; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PHANTOM LIMB; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65549100256     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0151     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: Epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95(8):875-883
2. Millstein S, Bain D, Hunter GA. A review of employment patterns of industrial amputees - Factors influencing rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1985;9(2):69-78.
3. Sheikh K. Return to work following limb injuries. J Soc Occup Med. 1985;35(4):114-117
4. Wright TW, Hagen AD, Wood MB. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;20(4):619-622
5. Davidson J. A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. J Hand Ther. 2002;15(1):62-70.
6. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, De Vries J, Göeken LN, Eisma WH. Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(6):803-811
7. Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim P, Rossbach P. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):723-729
8. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, Burgess AR. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: A long-term outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(8):563-571
9. Burger H, Marincek C, Isakov E. Mobility of persons after traumatic lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19(7):272-277
10. Smith DG, Horn P, Malchow D, Boone DA, Reiber GE, Hansen ST Jr. Prosthetic history, prosthetic charges, and functional outcome of the isolated, traumatic below-knee amputee. J Trauma. 1995;38(1):44-47.
11. Beekman CE, Axtell LA. Prosthetic use in elderly patients with dysvascular above-knee and through-knee amputations. Phys Ther. 1987;67(10):1510-1516
12. Wong MW. Lower extremity amputation in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2005;11(3):147-152
13. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise MC, Potvin D. Predisposing factors related to prosthetic use by people with a transtibial and transfemoral amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 1998;10(4):99-109.
14. Nielson CC, Psonak RA, Kalter TL. Factors affecting the use of prosthetic services. J Prosthet Orthot. 1989;4(1):242-249
15. Bilodeau S, Hébert R, Desrosiers J. Lower limb prosthesis utilisation by elderly amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000;24(2):126-132
16. Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H, Kärkkäinen M. Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1990;14(2):75-79.
17. Burger H, Marincek C. Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1994;18(1):25-33.
18. Dolezal JM, Vernick SH, Khan N, Lutz D, Tyndall C. Factors associated with use and nonuse of an AK prosthesis in a rural, southern, geriatric population. Int J Rehabil Health. 1998;4(4):245-252
19. Hyberd PJ, Beard DJ, Davey JJ, Morrison JD. A survey of upper-limb prosthesis users in Oxfordshire. J Prosthet Orthot. 1998;10(4):85-91.
20. Roeschlein RA, Domholdt E. Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1989;13(1):14-18.
21. Smith DG, Ehde DM, Legro MW, Reiber GE, Del Aguila M, Boone DA. Phantom limb, residual limb, and back pain after lower extremity amputations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(361):29-38.
22. Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Elzinga A, Van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: An epidemiological study. Pain. 2000;87(1):33-41.
23. Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(1):60-63.
24. Ehde DM, Czerniecki JM, Smith DG, Campbell KM, Edwards WT, Jensen MP, Robinson LR. Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(8):1039-1044
25. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999;83(2):157-162
26. Kejlaa GH. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993;17(3):157-163