A Frequency-Based Approach to L2 Phonological Learning: Teacher Input and Student Output an Intensive ESL Context

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 176-186

  Trofimovich, Pavel ^a   Collins, Laura ^a   Cardoso, Walcir ^a   White, Joanna ^a   Horst, Marlise ^a  

^a Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861387762     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.9     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bradlow, A. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2074-2085. doi:10.1121/1.427952
2. Bybee, J. (2002). Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies Second Language Acquisition, 24, 215-221. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002061
3. Collins, L., Halter, R. H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). Time and the distribution of time second language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 655-680. doi:10.2307/3587881
4. Collins, L., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2009). Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. Modern Language Journal, 93, 336-353. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00894.x
5. Collins, L., & White, J. (2011). An intensive look at intensity language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 106-133. doi:10.5054/tq.2011.240858
6. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects language processing. Studies Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002024
8. Eubank, L., & Gregg, K. R. (2002). News flash-Hume still dead. Studies Second Language Acquisition, 24, 237-247. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002085
9. Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1161-1173. doi:10.1121/1.414884
10. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2002). Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies Second Language Acquisition, 24, 249-260. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002097
11. Lightbown, P. M. (1985). Input and acquisition for second language learners and out of classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 6, 263-273. doi:10.1093/applin/6.3.263
12. Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
13. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and speaking? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59-82. doi:10.1353/cml.2006.0049
14. Piske, T., & Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.). (2009). Input matters SLA. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
15. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Trofimovich, P., Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2007). A dynamic look at L2 phonological learning: Seeking processing explanations for implicational phenomena. Studies Second Language Acquisition, 29, 407-448. doi:10.1017/S027226310707026X