Involving the public in priority setting: A case study using discrete choice experiments

Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 253-260

  Watson, Verity ^a   Carnon, Andrew ^b   Ryan, Mandy ^a   Cox, Derek ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

economics; health services; Methods

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCOTLAND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861372769     PISSN: 17413842     EISSN: 17413850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr102     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ham C. Priority setting in the NHS: Reports from six districts. Br Med J 1993;307:435-8.
2. Wiseman V, Mooney G, Berry G et al. Involving the public in priority setting: Experiences from Australia. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:1001-12.
3. Peacock S, Mitton C, Bate A et al. Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods. Health Policy 2009;92:124-32.
4. Tensensel T. Interpreting public input into priority setting: The role of mediating institutions. Health Policy 2002;62:173-94.
5. Wilson E, Peacock S, Ruta D. Priority setting in practice: What is the best way to compare costs and benefits? Health Econ 2009;18:467-87.
6. Cohen D. Messages from Mid Glamorgan: A multi-programme experiment with marginal analysis. Health Policy 1995;33:147-55.
7. Scott SN, Lees A. Developing a prioritisation framework: Experiences from a Scottish Health Authority. Health Expect 2001;4:10-7.
8. Mullen P. Public involvement in health care priority setting: An overview of methods for eliciting values. Health Expect 1999;2:222-34.
9. Farrar S, Ryan M. Eliciting preferences for health care using conjoint analysis. Br Med J 2000;320:1530-3.
10. Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 1966;74:132-57.
11. Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008.
12. Farrar S, Ryan M, Ross D et al. Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: An application to clinical service development. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:63-75.
13. Baltussen R, Stolk E, Chisholm D et al. Towards a multi-approach for priority setting: An application to Ghana. Health Econ 2006;15:689-96.
14. Bryan S, Roberts T, Heginbotham C et al. QALY-maximisation and public preferences: Results from a general population survey. Health Econ 2002;11:679-93.
15. Roberts T, Bryan S, Heginbotham C et al. Public involvement in health care priority setting: An economic perspective. Health Expect 1999;2:235-44.
16. Schwappach DLB. Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: A review of the debate and empirical evidence. Health Expect 2002;5:210-22.
17. Schwappach DLB. Are preferences for equality a matter of perspective? Med Decis Making 2005;25:449-58.
18. Schwappach DLB, Strasmann TJ. 'Quick and dirty numbers'? The reliability of a stated preference technique for the measurement of preferences for resource allocation. J Health Econ 2006;25:432-48.
19. Green C, Gerard K. Exploring the social value of health care intervention: A stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 2009;18:951-76.
20. Scottish Executive. Delivering for Health, 2005. http://www.scotland.gov. uk/Publications/2005/11/02102635/26356.
21. Leneghan J, New B, Mitchell E. Setting priorities: Is there are role for citizen's juries? Br Med J 1996;312:1591-3.
22. Bowling A. Health care rationing: The public's debate. Br Med J 1996;312:670-4.
23. Bowling A, Jacobson B, Southgate L. Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district. Soc Sci Med 1993;37:851-7.
24. Dixon J, Welch H. Priority setting: Lessons from Oregon. Lancet 1994;337:891-4.
25. Litva A, Coast J, Donovan J et al. 'The public is too subjective': Public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. Soc Sci Med 2002;54:1825-37.
26. Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B. The effect of group discussions on the public's view regarding priorities in health care. Br Med J 1999;318:916-9.
27. Leneghan J. Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizen's juries. Health Policy 1999;49:45-61.
28. Mitton C, Donaldson C. Tools of the trade: A comparative analysis of approaches to priority setting in healthcare. Health Serv Manage Res 2003;16:96-105.
29. Ryan M, Watson V. Counting the cost of fast access: Using discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:4-5.
30. Segal L, Mortimer D. A population-based model for priority setting across the care continuum and across modalities. Cost Effective Resour Allocat 2006;4:6.
31. Mitton C, Patten S, Waldner H et al. Priority setting in health authorities: A novel approach to a historical activity. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:1653-63.
32. Deshazo J, Fermo G. Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency. J Environ Econ Manage 2002;44:123-43.
33. Maddala T, Philips K, Johnson F. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences. Health Econ 2003;12:1035-47.
34. Swait J, Adamowicz W. Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: A theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2001;86:141-67.
35. Bech M, Kjaer T, Laudisen J. Does the number of choices sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 2010; doi:10.1002/hec.1587
36. Hensher D. Identifying the Influence of Stated Choice Design Dimensionality on Willingness to Pay for Travel Time Savings. Working paper ITS-WP-04-12. Institute for Transport Studies, The University of Sydney and Monash University, 2004.
37. Caussade S, Ortuzar J, Rizzi L et al. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. Transport Res B 2005;39:621-40.
38. Coast J. The appropriate uses of qualitative methods in health economics. Health Econ 1999;8(4):345-53.