Public involvement in health care priority setting: An overview of methods for eliciting values

Health Expectations

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 222-234

  Müllen, Penelope M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Priorities; Priority setting; Public involvement; Values

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0033380551     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00062.x     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Grimley Evans J. Health care rationing and elderly people. In: Tunbridge M. (ed.) Rationing of Health Care in Medicine. London: Royal College of Physicians of London, 1993: 50.
2. Feuerstein MT. Community participation in evaluation: problems and potentials. International Nursing Review, 1980; 27 (6): 187.
3. Arnstein S. A ladder of citizen participation in the USA. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969; 35: 216-224.
4. Müllen PM, Murray-Sykes K, Kearns WE. Community health council representation on planning teams: a question of politics. Public Health, 1984; 98 (2): 143-151.
5. Müllen PM. Is it necessary to ration health care? Public Money and Management, 1998; 18 (1): 52-58.
6. Müllen PM. Rational rationing? Health Services Management Research, 1998; 11 (2): 113-123.
7. Bowling A, Jacobson B, Southgate L. Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district. Social Science and Medicine, 1993; 37 (7): 851-857.
8. Stewart J, Kendall E, Coote A. Citizens' Juries. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 1994.
9. Lenaghan J, New B, Mitchell E. Setting priorities: in there a role for citizens' juries? British Medical Journal, 1997; 312 (7064): 1591-1593.
10. Dunkerley D, Glasner P. Empowering the public? Citizens' juries and the new genetic technologies. Critical Public Health, 1998; 8 (3): 181-192.
11. Richardson A. Determining priorities for purchasers: the public response to rationing within the NHS. Journal of Management in Medicine, 1997; 11 (4): 222-232.
12. Clark TN. Can you cut a budget pie? Policy and Politics, 1974; 3 (2): 3-31.
13. Clark TN. Modes of collective decision-making: eight criteria for evaluation of representatives, referenda, participation and surveys. Policy and Politics, 1976; 4: 13-22.
14. Hauser JR, Shugan SM. Intensity measures of consumer preference. Operations Research, 1980; 28: 278-320.
15. Brown CV, Jackson PM. Public Sector Economics. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1978.
16. Strauss RP, Hughes GD. A new approach to the demand for public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 1976; 6: 191-204.
17. Dodgson CL, (Lewis Carroll). A discussion of the various methods of procedures in conducting elec-lions. (Privately printed in Oxford in 1873). Reprinted in: Black D. (ed.) The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
18. Hoinville G, Courtenay G. Measuring consumer priorities. In: O'Riordan T, D'Arge RC (eds) Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning, Vol. 1. Chichester: Wiley, 1979: 143-178.
19. Linstone HA, Turoff M. (eds) The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975.
20. Hauser JR, Shugan SM. op.cit.
21. Churchman CW, Ackoff RL. An approximate measure of value. Operations Research, 1954; 2 (2): 172-181.
22. Saaty TL. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977; 15 (3): 234-281.
23. Saaty TL. That is not the analytic hierarchy process: what the AHP is and what it is not. Journal of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis, 1997; 6 (6): 324-335.
24. Ryan M. Using Consumer Preferences in Health Care Decision Making: the Application of Conjoint Analysis, London: Office of Health Economics, 1996.
25. Dolan P, Gudex G, Kind P, Williams A. The time trade-off methods: results from a general population study. Health Economics, 1995; 5 (2): 141-154.
26. Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1987.
27. O'Brien B, Viramontes JL. Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference? Medical Decision Making, 1994; 14 (3): 288-297.
28. Donaldson C, Farrar S, Mapp T, Walker A, Macphee S. Assessing community values in health care: is the willingness to pay method feasible? Health Care Analysis, 1997; 5 (1): 7-29.
29. Bryson N, Ngwenyama OK, Mobolurin A. A qualitative discriminant process for scoring and ranking in group support systems. Information Processing and Management, 1994; 30 (3): 389-405.
30. Kelly G A. A Theory of Personality: the Psychology of Personal Contracts, New York: Norton, 1963.
31. Knox PL. Regional and local variations in priority preferences. Urban Studies, 1977; 14: 103-107.
32. Hoinville G, Courtenay G. op.cit.
33. Hoinville G, Courtenay G. op.cit.
34. Müllen PM, Spurgeon P. Priority Setting and the Public. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1999.
35. Strauss RP, Hughes GD, op.cit.
36. Honigsbaum F, Richards J, Lockett T. Priority Setting in Action: Purchasing Dilemmas. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1995.
37. Heginbotham C, Ham C, Cochrane M, Richards J. Purchasing Dilemmas. London: King's Fund, 1992.
38. Courtenay G, Field J. South Yorkshire Structure Plan - Public Attitude Survey. London: Social & Community Planning Research, 1975.
39. Whitty P. What Are Colchester People's Priorities foi Health Care? A Population Surrey in Urban Colchester. Colchester: North Essex Health Authority, 1992.
40. Whitty P. op.cit.
41. Bowling A. What People Say About Prioritising Health Services. London: Kings Fund Centre, 1993.
42. Camasso MJ, Dick J. Using Multi-attribute utility theory as a priority-setting tool in human services planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 1993; 16 (4): 295-304.
43. Dolan JG, Bordley DR. Involving patients in complex decisions about their care - an approach using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of General Internai Medicine, 1993; 8 (4): 204-209.
44. Dolan JG, Bordley DR. Isoniazid Prophylaxis - the importance of individual values. Medical Decision Making, 1994; 14 (1): 1-8.
45. Dolan JG. Are patients capable of using the analytic hierarchy process and willing to use it to help make clinical decisions? Medical Decision Making, 1995; 15 (1): 76-80.
46. Stimson DH. Health agency decision making: an operations research perspective. In: Arnold MF, Blankenship LV, Hess (eds.) Administrative Health Systems: Issues and Perspectives, Chicago: Aldine Atherton, 1971:395-433.
47. Dickinson AL. Getting the best value from additional resources. Hospital and Health Services Review, 1979: 75: 127-129.
48. Müllen PM, Spurgeon P. op.cit.
49. Shackley P, Ryan M. Involving consumers in health care decision making. Health Care Analysis, 1995; 3 (3): 198.
50. McLean I. Public Choice. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987: 162.
51. Bonner J. Politics, Economics and Welfare. Brighton: VVheatsheaf Books, 1986: 81.
52. Donaldson C. Distributional Aspects of Willingness to Pay. Aberdeen: Health Economists Study Group, 1995.
53. Arrow KJ. Social Choice and Individual Values (2nd edn). New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.
54. Brown CV, Jackson PM. op.cit.: 72-74.
55. McLean I. op.cit.: 26.
56. Weale A. The allocation of scarce medical resources: a democrat's dilemma. In: Byrne P (ed.) Medicine, Medical Ethics and the Value of Life. Chichester: Wiley, 1990: 122.
57. Ferez J. Theoretical elements of comparison among ordinal discrete multi-criteria methods Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1994; 3 (3): 157-176.
58. Huber GP. Multi-attribute utility models: a review of field and field-like studies. Management Science, 1974; 20 (10): 1393-1402.
59. Clark TN. op.cit.: 26.
60. Müllen PM. Delphi-type studies in the health services: the impact of the scoring system. Research Report 17. Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 1983.
61. Hoinville G, Courtenay G. op.cit.: 175.