Public involvement in health care priority setting: An economic perspective

Health Expectations

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 235-244

  Roberts, Tracy ^a   Bryan, Stirling ^a   Heginbotham, Chris ^b   McCallum, Alison ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b MOUNT VERNON CANCER CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health economics; Priority setting; Public involvement; Quality adjusted life years (QALYs)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; INTERVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0033401788     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00061.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Secretary of State for Health. The Health of the Nation. HMSO: London, 1991.
2. Mclver S. Information for public choice. British Medical Bulletin, 1995; 51: 900-913.
3. Secretary of State for Health. The New NHS, Modern, Dependable. HMSO: London, 1997.
4. BMA. Medical Ethics Today. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1993.
5. Price D. Lessons for health care rationing from the case of Child B. British MedicalJoiirnal, 1996; 312: 167-169.
6. Ham C, Pickard S. Tragic Choices in Health Care: the Case of Child B. London: King's Fund, 1998.
7. Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Bradbury R, Pehl LJ. Media coverage of the Child B case. British Medical Journal, 1996; 312: 1587-1591.
8. New B. The rationing agenda in the NHS. British MedicalJoiirnal, 1996; 312: 1593-1601.
9. Shackley P, Ryan M. Involving consumers in health care decision making. Health Care Analysis, 1995; 3: 196-204.
10. Williams A. Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. British Medical Journal, 1985; 291: 326-329.
11. Maynard A, Bloor K. Our Certain Fate: Rationing in Health Care. London: Office of Health Economics, 1998.
12. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
13. Nord E. The QALY - a measure of social value rather than individual utility? Health Economics, 1994; 3: 89-93.
14. Dolan P. The measurement of individual utility and social welfare. Journal of Health Economics, 1998; 17: 39-52.
15. Williams A. Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument. Health Economics, 1997; 6: 117-132.
16. Williams A. Rationing health care by age: the case for. British MedicalJoimml, 1997; 314: 820-822.
17. Ryan M, Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Economics, 1997; 6: 261-274.
18. Bryan S, Buxton M, Sheldon R, Grant A. Magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of knee injuries: an investigation of preferences. Health Economics, 1998; 7: 595-604.
19. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy, 1996; 37: 53-72.
20. Pearmain D, Swanson J, Kroes E, Bradley M. Stated Preference Techniques: a Guide to Practice. The Hague: Hague Consulting Group, 1991.
21. Nord E, Richardson J, Street A, Kuhse H, Singer P. Maximizing health benefits versus egalitarianism: an Australian survey of health issues. Social Science and Medicine, 1995; 41: 1429-1437.
22. Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B. Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study. British MedicalJournal, 1999; 318: 916-919.