메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-23

The impact of group purchasing organizations on healthcare-product supply chains

Author keywords

Group purchasing organizations; Healthcare products; Supply chain management

Indexed keywords

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION; CURRENT LAW; GAME-THEORETIC MODEL; GROUP PURCHASING ORGANIZATION; PURCHASING COSTS; SINGLE PRODUCT; SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; TRANSACTION COST; UNIT PRICES;

EID: 84861351246     PISSN: 15234614     EISSN: 15265498     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1110.0355     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (72)

References (24)
  • 1
    • 63349109095 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Purchasing consortia as a strategic weapon for highly decentralized multi-divisional companies
    • University of Naples Frederico II, Naples, Italy, T3/7-1-T3/7-12
    • Arnold, U. 1997. Purchasing consortia as a strategic weapon for highly decentralized multi-divisional companies. Proc. 6th IPSERA Conf., University of Naples Frederico II, Naples, Italy, T3/7-1-T3/7-12.
    • (1997) Proc. 6th IPSERA Conf
    • Arnold, U.1
  • 3
    • 56649085381 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hospital purchasing alliances: Utilization, services, and performance
    • Burns, L. R., J. A. Lee. 2008. Hospital purchasing alliances: Utilization, services, and performance. Health Care Management Rev. 33(3) 203-215.
    • (2008) Health Care Management Rev. , vol.33 , Issue.3 , pp. 203-215
    • Burns, L.R.1    Lee, J.A.2
  • 5
    • 79952650290 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Group buying of competing retailers
    • Chen, R. R., P. Roma. 2011. Group buying of competing retailers. Production Oper. Management 20(2) 181-197.
    • (2011) Production Oper. Management , vol.20 , Issue.2 , pp. 181-197
    • Chen, R.R.1    Roma, P.2
  • 6
    • 84856967538 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Buyer groups as strategic commitments
    • ePub ahead of print August 30
    • Dana, J. D., Jr. 2011. Buyer groups as strategic commitments. Games Econom. Behav., ePub ahead of print August 30, http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.geb.2011.08.014.
    • (2011) Games Econom. Behav
    • Dana Jr., J.D.1
  • 7
    • 1642618456 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Strong monotonicity in surplus sharing
    • Friedman, E. J. 2004. Strong monotonicity in surplus sharing. Econom. Theory 23(3) 643-658. (Pubitemid 38411542)
    • (2004) Economic Theory , vol.23 , Issue.3 , pp. 643-658
    • Friedman, E.J.1
  • 8
    • 0000213422 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Three methods to share joint costs or surplus
    • Friedman, E., H. Moulin. 1999. Three methods to share joint costs or surplus. J. Econom. Theory 87(2) 275-312.
    • (1999) J. Econom. Theory , vol.87 , Issue.2 , pp. 275-312
    • Friedman, E.1    Moulin, H.2
  • 9
    • 84861408862 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Healthcare Supply Chain Association (HSCA) Report, HSCA, Washington DC. Accessed December 5
    • Healthcare Supply Chain Association (HSCA). 2011. A primer on group purchasing organizations: Questions and answers. Report, HSCA, Washington, DC. Accessed December 5, http://higpa.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/research/gpo- primer.pdf.
    • (2011) A Primer on Group Purchasing Organizations: Questions and Answers
  • 10
    • 79951965193 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Controversial role of GPOs in healthcareproduct supply chains
    • Hu, Q., L. Schwarz. 2011. Controversial role of GPOs in healthcareproduct supply chains. Production Oper. Management 20(1) 1-15.
    • (2011) Production Oper. Management , vol.20 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-15
    • Hu, Q.1    Schwarz, L.2
  • 11
    • 47949092378 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Group purchasing, nonlinear tariffs, and oligopoly
    • Marvel, H. P., H. Yang. 2008. Group purchasing, nonlinear tariffs, and oligopoly. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(5) 1090-1105.
    • (2008) Internat. J. Indust. Organ. , vol.26 , Issue.5 , pp. 1090-1105
    • Marvel, H.P.1    Yang, H.2
  • 12
    • 84985143336 scopus 로고
    • On additive methods to share joint costs
    • Moulin, H. 1995. On additive methods to share joint costs. Japanese Econom. Rev. 46(4) 303-332.
    • (1995) Japanese Econom. Rev. , vol.46 , Issue.4 , pp. 303-332
    • Moulin, H.1
  • 13
    • 0030123835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cost sharing under increasing returns: A comparison of simple mechanisms
    • DOI 10.1006/game.1996.0035
    • Moulin, H. 1996. Cost sharing under increasing returns: A comparison of simple mechanisms. Games Econom. Behav. 13 225-251. (Pubitemid 126164211)
    • (1996) Games and Economic Behavior , vol.13 , Issue.2 , pp. 225-251
    • Moulin, H.1
  • 15
    • 0031503771 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nonlinear supply contracts, exclusive dealing, and equilibrium market foreclosure
    • O'Brien, D. P., G. Shaffer. 1997. Nonlinear supply contracts, exclusive dealing, and equilibrium market foreclosure. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(4) 755-785. (Pubitemid 127343123)
    • (1997) Journal of Economics and Management Strategy , vol.6 , Issue.4 , pp. 755-785
    • O'Brien, D.P.1    Shaffer, G.2
  • 17
    • 35948941890 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Unfair allocation of gains under the Equal Price allocation method in purchasing groups
    • DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.009, PII S0377221707003050
    • Schotanus, F., J. Telgen, L. de Boer. 2008. Unfair allocation of gains under equal price allocation method in purchasing groups. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187(1) 162-176. (Pubitemid 350064595)
    • (2008) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.187 , Issue.1 , pp. 162-176
    • Schotanus, F.1    Telgen, J.2    De Boer, L.3
  • 18
    • 50349083992 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Unraveling quantity discounts
    • Schotanus, F., J. Telgen, L. de Boer. 2009. Unraveling quantity discounts. Omega 37 510-521.
    • (2009) Omega , vol.37 , pp. 510-521
    • Schotanus, F.1    Telgen, J.2    De Boer, L.3
  • 21
    • 18844411759 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (GAO) Report GAO-02-690T. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition, and Business and Consumer Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, April 30, 2002
    • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (GAO). 2002. Group purchasing organizations: Pilot study suggests large buying groups do not always offer hospital lower prices. Report GAO-02-690T. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition, and Business and Consumer Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, April 30, 2002.
    • (2002) Group Purchasing Organizations: Pilot Study Suggests Large Buying Groups Do Not Always Offer Hospital Lower Prices
  • 22
    • 84861414273 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (GAO) Report GAO-03-998T. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, July 16, 2003
    • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (GAO). 2003. Group purchasing organizations: Use of contracting processes and strategies to award contracts for medical-surgical products. Report GAO-03-998T. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, July 16, 2003.
    • (2003) Group Purchasing Organizations: Use of Contracting Processes and Strategies to Award Contracts for Medical-surgical Products
  • 24
    • 84861408861 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • U.S. Senate Minority Staff Report, 111th Congress, Senate Finance Committee, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Ranking Member, September 24, 2010. Accessed December 5 2011
    • U.S. Senate. 2010. Empirical data lacking to support claims of savings with group purchasing organizations. Minority Staff Report, 111th Congress, Senate Finance Committee, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Ranking Member, September 24, 2010. Accessed December 5, 2011, http://www.grassley.senate.gov/about/ upload/2010-09-24-GPO-Report.pdf.
    • (2010) Empirical Data Lacking to Support Claims of Savings with Group Purchasing Organizations


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.