-
1
-
-
63349109095
-
Purchasing consortia as a strategic weapon for highly decentralized multi-divisional companies
-
University of Naples Frederico II, Naples, Italy, T3/7-1-T3/7-12
-
Arnold, U. 1997. Purchasing consortia as a strategic weapon for highly decentralized multi-divisional companies. Proc. 6th IPSERA Conf., University of Naples Frederico II, Naples, Italy, T3/7-1-T3/7-12.
-
(1997)
Proc. 6th IPSERA Conf
-
-
Arnold, U.1
-
3
-
-
56649085381
-
Hospital purchasing alliances: Utilization, services, and performance
-
Burns, L. R., J. A. Lee. 2008. Hospital purchasing alliances: Utilization, services, and performance. Health Care Management Rev. 33(3) 203-215.
-
(2008)
Health Care Management Rev.
, vol.33
, Issue.3
, pp. 203-215
-
-
Burns, L.R.1
Lee, J.A.2
-
4
-
-
77950515757
-
Supply chain coordination with contracts
-
A. G. de Kok, S. C. Graves, eds Elsevier, Amsterdam
-
Cachon, G. P. 2003. Supply chain coordination with contracts. A. G. de Kok, S. C. Graves, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 229-340.
-
(2003)
Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management
, pp. 229-340
-
-
Cachon, G.P.1
-
5
-
-
79952650290
-
Group buying of competing retailers
-
Chen, R. R., P. Roma. 2011. Group buying of competing retailers. Production Oper. Management 20(2) 181-197.
-
(2011)
Production Oper. Management
, vol.20
, Issue.2
, pp. 181-197
-
-
Chen, R.R.1
Roma, P.2
-
6
-
-
84856967538
-
Buyer groups as strategic commitments
-
ePub ahead of print August 30
-
Dana, J. D., Jr. 2011. Buyer groups as strategic commitments. Games Econom. Behav., ePub ahead of print August 30, http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.geb.2011.08.014.
-
(2011)
Games Econom. Behav
-
-
Dana Jr., J.D.1
-
7
-
-
1642618456
-
Strong monotonicity in surplus sharing
-
Friedman, E. J. 2004. Strong monotonicity in surplus sharing. Econom. Theory 23(3) 643-658. (Pubitemid 38411542)
-
(2004)
Economic Theory
, vol.23
, Issue.3
, pp. 643-658
-
-
Friedman, E.J.1
-
8
-
-
0000213422
-
Three methods to share joint costs or surplus
-
Friedman, E., H. Moulin. 1999. Three methods to share joint costs or surplus. J. Econom. Theory 87(2) 275-312.
-
(1999)
J. Econom. Theory
, vol.87
, Issue.2
, pp. 275-312
-
-
Friedman, E.1
Moulin, H.2
-
9
-
-
84861408862
-
-
Healthcare Supply Chain Association (HSCA) Report, HSCA, Washington DC. Accessed December 5
-
Healthcare Supply Chain Association (HSCA). 2011. A primer on group purchasing organizations: Questions and answers. Report, HSCA, Washington, DC. Accessed December 5, http://higpa.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/research/gpo- primer.pdf.
-
(2011)
A Primer on Group Purchasing Organizations: Questions and Answers
-
-
-
10
-
-
79951965193
-
Controversial role of GPOs in healthcareproduct supply chains
-
Hu, Q., L. Schwarz. 2011. Controversial role of GPOs in healthcareproduct supply chains. Production Oper. Management 20(1) 1-15.
-
(2011)
Production Oper. Management
, vol.20
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-15
-
-
Hu, Q.1
Schwarz, L.2
-
11
-
-
47949092378
-
Group purchasing, nonlinear tariffs, and oligopoly
-
Marvel, H. P., H. Yang. 2008. Group purchasing, nonlinear tariffs, and oligopoly. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(5) 1090-1105.
-
(2008)
Internat. J. Indust. Organ.
, vol.26
, Issue.5
, pp. 1090-1105
-
-
Marvel, H.P.1
Yang, H.2
-
12
-
-
84985143336
-
On additive methods to share joint costs
-
Moulin, H. 1995. On additive methods to share joint costs. Japanese Econom. Rev. 46(4) 303-332.
-
(1995)
Japanese Econom. Rev.
, vol.46
, Issue.4
, pp. 303-332
-
-
Moulin, H.1
-
13
-
-
0030123835
-
Cost sharing under increasing returns: A comparison of simple mechanisms
-
DOI 10.1006/game.1996.0035
-
Moulin, H. 1996. Cost sharing under increasing returns: A comparison of simple mechanisms. Games Econom. Behav. 13 225-251. (Pubitemid 126164211)
-
(1996)
Games and Economic Behavior
, vol.13
, Issue.2
, pp. 225-251
-
-
Moulin, H.1
-
14
-
-
79951984094
-
-
Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
-
Nagarajan, M., G. Sosic, H. Zhang. 2008. Stability of group purchasing organization. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
-
(2008)
Stability of Group Purchasing Organization
-
-
Nagarajan, M.1
Sosic, G.2
Zhang, H.3
-
15
-
-
0031503771
-
Nonlinear supply contracts, exclusive dealing, and equilibrium market foreclosure
-
O'Brien, D. P., G. Shaffer. 1997. Nonlinear supply contracts, exclusive dealing, and equilibrium market foreclosure. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(4) 755-785. (Pubitemid 127343123)
-
(1997)
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy
, vol.6
, Issue.4
, pp. 755-785
-
-
O'Brien, D.P.1
Shaffer, G.2
-
17
-
-
35948941890
-
Unfair allocation of gains under the Equal Price allocation method in purchasing groups
-
DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.009, PII S0377221707003050
-
Schotanus, F., J. Telgen, L. de Boer. 2008. Unfair allocation of gains under equal price allocation method in purchasing groups. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187(1) 162-176. (Pubitemid 350064595)
-
(2008)
European Journal of Operational Research
, vol.187
, Issue.1
, pp. 162-176
-
-
Schotanus, F.1
Telgen, J.2
De Boer, L.3
-
18
-
-
50349083992
-
Unraveling quantity discounts
-
Schotanus, F., J. Telgen, L. de Boer. 2009. Unraveling quantity discounts. Omega 37 510-521.
-
(2009)
Omega
, vol.37
, pp. 510-521
-
-
Schotanus, F.1
Telgen, J.2
De Boer, L.3
-
20
-
-
79951978959
-
-
Report, Medical Device Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC. Accessed December 5 2011
-
Singer, H. J. 2006. The budgetary impact of eliminating the GPOs' safe harbor exemption from the anti-kickback statute of the Social Security Act. Report, Medical Device Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC. Accessed December 5, 2011, http://www.medicaldevices.org/node/76.
-
(2006)
The Budgetary Impact of Eliminating the GPOs' Safe Harbor Exemption from the Anti-kickback Statute of the Social Security Act
-
-
Singer, H.J.1
-
21
-
-
18844411759
-
-
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (GAO) Report GAO-02-690T. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition, and Business and Consumer Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, April 30, 2002
-
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (GAO). 2002. Group purchasing organizations: Pilot study suggests large buying groups do not always offer hospital lower prices. Report GAO-02-690T. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition, and Business and Consumer Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, April 30, 2002.
-
(2002)
Group Purchasing Organizations: Pilot Study Suggests Large Buying Groups Do Not Always Offer Hospital Lower Prices
-
-
-
22
-
-
84861414273
-
-
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (GAO) Report GAO-03-998T. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, July 16, 2003
-
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (GAO). 2003. Group purchasing organizations: Use of contracting processes and strategies to award contracts for medical-surgical products. Report GAO-03-998T. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, July 16, 2003.
-
(2003)
Group Purchasing Organizations: Use of Contracting Processes and Strategies to Award Contracts for Medical-surgical Products
-
-
-
24
-
-
84861408861
-
-
U.S. Senate Minority Staff Report, 111th Congress, Senate Finance Committee, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Ranking Member, September 24, 2010. Accessed December 5 2011
-
U.S. Senate. 2010. Empirical data lacking to support claims of savings with group purchasing organizations. Minority Staff Report, 111th Congress, Senate Finance Committee, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Ranking Member, September 24, 2010. Accessed December 5, 2011, http://www.grassley.senate.gov/about/ upload/2010-09-24-GPO-Report.pdf.
-
(2010)
Empirical Data Lacking to Support Claims of Savings with Group Purchasing Organizations
-
-
|