Network dynamics of television use in school classes

Social Networks

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 346-358

  Friemel, Thomas N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Conversation; Diffusion; Dynamic social network analysis; Interpersonal communication; Mass media use; School classes; Television program preferences; TV genres; Two step flow of communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861345256     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Bakagiannis S., Tarrant M. Can music bring people together? Effects of shared musical preference on intergroup bias in adolescence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2006, 47:129-136.
2. Bantz C.R. Exploring uses and gratifications: a comparison of reported uses of television and reported uses of favorite program type. Communication Research 1982, 9(3):352-379.
3. Baym N.K. Tune in, Log on. Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community 2000, Sage, Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi.
4. Berger C.R., Calabrese R.J. Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research 1975, 1:99-112.
5. Blau P.M. Exchange and Power in Social Life 2008, Transaction, New Brunswick/London.
6. Bonfadelli, H., 1999. Medienwirkungsforschung I. Grundlagen und theoretische Perspektiven. UVK, Konstanz.
7. Bonfadelli H., Saxer U. Lesen, Fernsehen und Lernen 1986, Klett, Zug.
8. Bourdieu P. La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Le sens commun 1979, Les éd. de Minuit, Paris.
9. Media Effects. Advances in Theory and Research 2002, Mahwah. 2nd ed. J. Bryant, D. Zillmann (Eds.).
10. Burk W.J., Steglich C.E.G., Snijders T.A.B. Beyond dyadic interdependence: actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2007, 397-404.
11. Coleman J., Katz E., Menzel H. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study 1966, Indianapolis.
12. Davies J. Influences on media use of peer groups. Encyclopedia of Children, Adolescents, and the Media 2007, 648-650. Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks, Calif. J.J. Arnett (Ed.).
13. De Klepper M., Sleebos E., van de Bunt G., Agneessens F. Similarity in friendship networks: selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks 2010, 32(1):82-90.
14. DiMaggio P. Classification in art. American Sociological Review 1987, 52(4):440-455.
15. Eveland W.P. The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: the roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication 2004, 21(2):177-193.
16. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 1954, 7:117-140.
17. Finn S. Origins of media exposure: linking personality traits to TV, radio, print, and film use. Communication Research 1997, 24(5):507-529.
18. Friemel, T.N., 2008. Mediennutzung im sozialen Kontext: Soziale Netzwerkanalyse der Funktionen und Effekte interpersonaler Kommunikation über massenmediale Inhalte. Dissertation. University of Zurich, Zürich. Retrieved 1.10.10, from http://www.friemel.com/.
19. Friemel T.N., Knecht A. Praktikable vs. tatsächliche Grenzen von sozialen Netzwerken: Eine Diskussion zur Validität von Schulklassen als komplette Netzwerke. Grenzen von Netzwerken 2009, 15-32. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. 1st ed. R. Häußling (Ed.).
20. Gerich J., Lehner R. Soziale Netzwerke und Substanzaffinität - eine computergestützte egozentrierte Netzwerkerhebung. Anwendungen Sozialer Netzwerkanalyse: Beiträge zur Tagung vom 14. und 15. Oktober 2004 2005, U. Serdült (Ed.).
21. Greetham D.V., Hurling R., Osborne G., Linley A. Social network and positive and negative affect. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Dynamics of Social Network Analysis 2011.
22. Heider F. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology 1946, 21:107-112.
23. Heider F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations 1958, Wiley, New York.
24. Herzog H. Professor quiz - a gratification study. Radio and the Printed Page 1971, 64-93. Duell, Sloan & Pearce, New York. 2nd ed. P.F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.).
25. IP International Marketing Committee, 2007. Television 2007. International Key Facts. Köln.
26. Katz E. The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report on a hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly 1957, 21:61-78.
27. Katz E., Lazarsfeld P.F. Personal Influence. The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication, 2nd ed., Orig. 1955 1964, Free Press, New York.
28. Katz E., Liebes T. Mutual aid in the decoding of dallas: preliminary notes from a cross-cultural study. Television in Transition. Papers from the First International Television Studies Conference 1985, 187-198. P. Drummond, R. Paterson (Eds.).
29. Katz E., Blumler J.G., Gurevitch M. Utilization of masscommunication by the individual. The Uses of Mass Communications. Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research 1974, 19-32. Sage, Beverly Hills, London. J.G. Blumler, E. Katz (Eds.).
30. Kiefer M.-L. Massenkommunikation III. Eine Langzeitstudie zur Mediennutzung und Medienbewertung 1964-1985. Schriftenreihe Media Perspektiven 1987, vol. 9. Alfred Metzner, Frankfurt a.M.
31. Kippax S., Murray J.P. Using the mass media: need gratification and perceived utility. Communication Research 1980, 7(3):335-360.
32. Knecht, A., 2008. Friendship selection and friends' influence. Dynamics of networks and actor attributes in early adolescence. PhD Dissertation. ICS Utrecht. Enschede: PrintPartners.
33. Krotz F. Anschlusskommunikation im Internet. Daily Soaps und Daily Talks im Alltag von Jugendlichen 2001, 265-307. Leske & Budrich, Opladen. U. Göttlich, F. Krotz, I. Paus-Haase (Eds.).
34. Lazarsfeld P.F., Merton R.K. Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society 1954, 18-66. Van Nostrand, New York. M. Berger (Ed.).
35. Lazarsfeld P.F., Berelson B., Gaudet H. The People's Choice, 3rd ed. Orig. 1944 1968, Columbia University Press, New York/London.
36. Levy M.R., Windhal S. Audience activity and gratifications: a conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research 1984, 11(1):51-78.
37. Lizardo O. How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American Sociological Review 2006, 71(5):778-807.
38. Mark N. Birds of a feather sing together. Social Forces 1998, 77(2):453-485.
39. McCombs M., Shaw D. The agenda-setting-function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 1972, 36(2):176-187.
40. McLeod J., Chaffee S. Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioural Scientist 1973, 16:469-499.
41. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 2001, 27:415-444.
42. Mercken L., Snijders T.A.B., Steglich C.E.G., Vartiainen E., de Vries H. Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks 2010, 32(1):72-81.
43. Merten K. Kommunikation. Eine Begriffs- und Prozessanalyse 1977, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
44. Merton R.K. Patterns of influence: a study of interpersonal influence and of communications behavior in a local community. Communications Research 1948-1949 1949, 180-219. Harper, New York. P.F. Lazarsfeld, F.N. Stanton (Eds.).
45. Mulder J., ter Bogt T., Raaijmakers Q., Vollebergh W. Music taste groups as problem behavior. Youth Adolescences 2007, 36:313-324.
46. Mutz D.C. Impersonal Influence. How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes 1998, Cambridge UP, Cambridge & New York.
47. Newcomb T.M. Individual systems of orientation. Psychology: A Study of a Science. Vol. 3 Formulations of the Person and the Social Context 1959, 384-422. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, Toronto, London. S. Koch (Ed.).
48. Noelle-Neumann E. Kumulation, Konsonanz und öffentlichkeitseffekt. Ein neuer Ansatz zur Analyse der Wirkung der Massenmedien. Publizistik 1973, 18(1):26-55.
49. Palmgreen P., Rayburn J. Uses and gratifications and exposure to public television. Communication Research 1979, 6(2):155-179.
50. Palmgreen P., Wenner Lawrence A., Rayburn J. Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: a study of television news. Communication Research 1980, 7(2):161-192.
51. Paus-Haase I. Talkshows im Alltag von Jugendlichen 1999, Opladen.
52. Pearson M., Steglich C., Snijders T. Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections 2006, 27(1):47-63.
53. Reardon K.K., Rogers E.M. Interpersonal versus mass media communication. A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research 1988, 15(2):284-303.
54. Raney A.A. Why we watch and enjoy mediated sports. Handbook of Sports and Media 2006, 313-329. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah. A.A. Raney, J. Bryant (Eds.).
55. Renfrow P. The do re mi's of everyday life: the structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 48:1236-1256.
56. Rice R.E. Using network concepts to clarify sources and mechanisms of social influence. Progress in Communication Sciences: Advances in Communication Network Analysis 1993, 43-62. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. W. Richards, G. Barnett (Eds.).
57. Rice R.E., Donohew L., Clayton R. Peer network, sensation seeking, and drug use among junior and senior high school students. Connections 2003, 25(2):32-58.
58. Rogers E.M., Kincaid L.D. Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm of Research 1981, Free Press, New York/London.
59. Ripley, R.M., Snijders, T.A.B., 2011. Manual for SIENA Version 4.0, University of Oxford. Version: April 11, 2011. Retrieved from (last checked 26.04.11). http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/siena.html.
60. Rogers, E.M., 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York.
61. Scherer H., Schlütz D. Gratifikation à la minute: Die zeitnahe Erfassung von Gratifikationen. Empirische Perspektiven der Rezeptionsforschung 2002, 133-151. Reinhard Fischer, München. P. Rössler, S. Kubisch, V. Gehrau (Eds.).
62. Schramm H., Klimmt C. Nach dem Spiel ist vor dem Spiel. Die Rezeption der Fussball-Weltmeisterschaft 2002 im Fernsehen: Eine Panel-Studie zur Entwicklung von Rezeptionsmotiven im Turnierverlauf. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 2003, 51(1):55-81.
63. Selfhout M., et al. Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: a social network approach. Journal of Personality 2010, 78(2):509-538.
64. Snijders T.A.B. Analyzing the joint dynamics of several networks. Sunbelt XXIX. INSNA Annual Conference 2009.
65. Snijders, T.A.B., 2008. Multilevel Longitudinal Network Analysis. University of Oxford/University of Groningen. Retrieved 1.12.10, from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/siena08.htm.
66. Snijders T.A.B., van de Bunt G.G., Steglich C.E.G. Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks 2010, 32(1):44-60.
67. Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C.E.G., Schweinberger, M., Huisman, M., 2007. Manual for SIENA Version 3.2, University of Oxford/University of Groningen, Oxford/Groningen. Retrieved 1.9.07, from University of Oxford/University of Groningen: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/.
68. Snijders T.A.B., Baerveldt C. A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2003, 27:123-151.
69. Snyder C.R., Fromkin H.L. Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. Perspectives in Social Psychology 1980, Plenum Press, New York.
70. Steglich C.E.G., Snijders T.A., Pearson M. Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology 2010, 40(1):329-393.
71. Steglich C., Snijders T.A.B., West P. Applying SIENA. An illustrative analysis of the coevolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology 2006, 2(1):48-56.
72. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations 1986, 7-24. Nelson-Hall, Chicago. S. Worchel, W.G. Austin (Eds.).
73. Tarrant M. Impact of media on peer groups. Encyclopedia of Children, Adolescents, and the Media 2007, 647-648. Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks, Calif. J.J. Arnett (Ed.).
74. Tarrant M., North A.C., Hargreaves D.J. Social categorization, self-esteem, and the estimated musical preferences of male adolescents. The Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 141(5):565-581.
75. ter Bogt T., et al. Youngsters and their musical taste: musical styles and taste groups. The Netherlands' Journal of Social Sciences 2003, 39(1):35-52.
76. Tichenor P.J., Donohue G.A., Olien C.N. Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 1970, 34:159-170.
77. Turner J.C., Hogg M.A., Oakes P.J., Reicher S.D., Wetherell M.S. Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory 1987, Blackwell, Oxford.
78. Vogelgesang W. Jugendmedien und Jugendszenen. Rundfunk und Fernsehen 1996, 44(3):346-364.
79. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications 1994, Cambridge UP, New York & Cambridge.
80. Weimann G. The Influentials. People Who Influence People 1994, SUNY, New York.
81. Weiss R. Soziographie kommunikativer Milieus. Rundfunk und Fernsehen 1996, 44(3):325-345.
82. Wenner L.A. Gratifications sought and obtained in program dependency: a study of network evening news programs and 60min. Communication Research 1982, 9(4):539-560.