Two multimodal formats for responding to requests

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 44, Issue 6-7, 2012, Pages 829-842

  Rauniomaa, Mirka ^a   Keisanen, Tiina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Embodied interaction; Requesting; Responding; Social action formats

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861336867     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cekaite Asta Shepherding the child: embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions. Text & Talk 2010, 30(1):1-25.
2. Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth, Fox Barbara, Thompson Sandra A. Social action construction: responding to requests. Presentation at the 12th International Pragmatics Conference 2011.
3. Craven Alexandra, Potter Jonathan Directives: entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies 2010, 12(4):419-442.
4. Curl Traci, Drew Paul Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language & Social Interaction 2008, 41(2):129-153.
5. Davidson Judy.A. Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis 1984, 102-128. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (Eds.).
6. Davidson Judy A. Modifications of invitations, offers and rejections. Interaction Competence 1990, 149-180. International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America, Washington, DC. G. Psathas (Ed.).
7. Drew Paul Conversation analysis. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction 2005, 71-102. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. K.L. Fitch, R.E. Sanders (Eds.).
8. Du Bois John, Schuetze-Coburn Stephen, Cumming Susanna, Paolino Danae An outline of discourse transcription. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research 1993, 45-87. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J. Edwards, M. Lampert (Eds.).
9. Fox Barbara Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Studies 2007, 9(3):299-318.
10. Fox Barbara, Thompson Sandra A. Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2010, 43(2):133-156.
11. Gill Virginia Teas, Halkowski Timothy, Roberts Felicia Accomplishing a request without making one: a single case analysis of a primary care visit. Text 2001, 21(1/2):55-81.
12. Goodwin Charles Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 2000, 32(10):1489-1522.
13. Goodwin Marjorie Harness Participation, affect and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk 2006, 26(4/5):515-543.
14. Heinemann Trine 'Will you or can't you?': Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics 2006, 38(7):1081-1104.
15. Heritage John A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis 1984, 299-345. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (Eds.).
16. Houtkoop Hanneke Establishing Agreement: An Analysis of Proposal-Acceptance Sequences 1987, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
17. Jefferson Gail Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation 2004, 13-31. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. G. Lerner (Ed.).
18. Kärkkäinen, Elise, Keisanen, Tiina. Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers. Discourse Studies, in press.
19. Keisanen, Tiina, Rauniomaa, Mirka. Organization of participation and contingency in pre-beginnings of request sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, in press.
20. Kuroshima Satomi Another look at the service encounter: progressivity, intersubjectivity, and trust in a Japanese sushi restaurant. Journal of Pragmatics 2010, 40(3):856-869.
21. Lee Seung-Hee Managing non-granting of customers' requests in commercial service encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2011, 44(2):109-134.
22. Lindström Anna Language as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody, and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk Uppsala universitet 46 1999, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Uppsala University.
23. Lindström Anna Language as social action: a study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction 2005, 209-230. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. A. Hakulinen, M. Selting (Eds.).
24. Raymond Geoffrey Grammar and social organization. Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 2003, 68(6):939-967.
25. Schegloff Emanuel Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. Interaction and Grammar 1996, 52-133. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, S. Thompson (Eds.).
26. Schegloff Emanuel Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis 2007, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Sorjonen Marja-Leena Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish 2001, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
28. Sorjonen Marja-Leena, Raevaara Liisa, Lappalainen Hanna Mä otan tän. Käynnin syyn esittämisen tavat kioskilla. Kieli kioskilla. Tutkimuksia kioskiasioinnin rutiineista 2009, 90-119. SKS - Finnish Literature Society, Helsinki. H. Lappalainen, L. Raevaara (Eds.).
29. Stevanovic Melisa Participants' deontic rights and action formation: the case of declarative requests for action. InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures 2011, 52. http://www.inlist.uni-bayreuth.de/issues/52/InLiSt52.pdf (accessed 22.02.12).
30. Stivers Tanya, Rossano Federico Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction 2010, 43(1):3-31.
31. Streeck Jürgen, Goodwin Charles, LeBaron Curtis Embodied interaction in the material world. An introduction. Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World 2011, 1-26. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, C. LeBaron (Eds.).
32. Tulbert Eve, Goodwin Marjorie Harness Choreographies of attention: multimodality in a routine family activity. Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World 2011, 79-92. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, C. LeBaron (Eds.).
33. Vinkhuyzen Erik, Szymanski Margaret Would you like to do it yourself? Service requests and their non-granting responses. Applying Conversation Analysis 2005, 91-106. Palgrave, Basingstoke. K. Richards, P. Seedhouse (Eds.).
34. Wootton Anthony Two request forms of four year olds. Journal of Pragmatics 1981, 5(6):511-523.