The primacy effect in memory for repetitions: Evidence for the role of lag between repetitions in source monitoring

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 295-305

  Boywitt, C Dennis ^a   Brandt, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Repetition memory; Source memory; Spacing effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REPETITION PRIMING; REVIEW; SOURCE MEMORY; ARTICLE; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; RECALL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84861326524     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.617303     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Batchelder,W. H., & a Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
2. Bellezza, F. S., & a Young, D. R. (1989). Chunking of repeated events in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 990-997.
3. Benjamin, A. S., & a Craik, F. I. M. (2001). Parallel effects of aging and time pressure on memory for source: Evidence from the spacing effect. Memory and Cognition, 29, 691-697. Center for Lexical Information. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM.
4. Baayen, H.R., Piepenbrock, R., & a Gulikers, L. Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Mozer, M. C., Pashler, H., & a Wixted, J. T. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236-246.
5. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & a Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380.
6. Chalfonte, B. L., & a Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 24, 403-416.
7. Challis, B. H. (1993). Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 389-396.
8. Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. DiGirolamo, G. J., & a Hintzman, D. L. (1997). First impressions are lasting impressions: A primacy effect in memory for repetitions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 121-124.
10. Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory and Cognition, 7, 95-112.
11. Greene, R. L. (1989). Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a 2-process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 371-377.
12. Hintzman, D. L., Block, R. A., & a Summers, J. J. (1973). Modality tags and memory for repetitions: Locus of the spacing effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 229-238.
13. Hintzman, D. L., & a Curran, T. (1995). When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning. Memory and Cognition, 23, 213-226.
14. Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., & a Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 667-680.
15. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & a Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
16. Malmberg, K. J., & a Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). The ''oneshot'' hypothesis for context storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 322-336.
17. Meiser, T., & a Brö ader, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
18. Miller, J. K., Westerman, D. L., & a Lloyd, M. E. (2004). Are first impressions lasting impressions? An exploration of the generality of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions. Memory and Cognition, 32, 1305-1315.
19. Russo, R., Mammarella, N., & a Avons, S. E. (2002). Toward a unified account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 819-829.
20. Russo, R., Parkin, A. J., Taylor, S. R., & a Wilks, J. (1998). Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 161-172.
21. Snodgrass, J. G., & a Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
22. Thios, S. J., & a D'Agostino, P. R. (1976). Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 529-536.
23. Weldon, M. S., & a Roediger, H. L. (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory and Cognition, 15, 269-280.