Controlling morphology of peptide-based soft structures by covalent modifications

Journal of Peptide Science

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 405-412

  Gour, Nidhi ^a,b   Barman, Apurba K ^a   Verma, Sandeep ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Diphenylalanine; Lectin; Mannose; Nanotubes; Self assembly; Vesicles

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CARBOHYDRATE; CONCANAVALIN A; DIPEPTIDE; DIPHENYLALANINE DIPEPTIDE; LECTIN; MANNOSE; PEPTIDE NANOTUBE; THIOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONJUGATION; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MORPHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; SCANNING ELECTROCHEMICAL MICROSCOPY; THERMOGRAVIMETRY;

DIPEPTIDES; MANNOSE; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PHENYLALANINE; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 84861235124     PISSN: 10752617     EISSN: 10991387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/psc.2411     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Wang Y, Xu H, Zhang X. Tuning the amphiphilicity of building blocks: controlled self-assembly and disassembly for functional supramolecular materials. Adv. Mater. 2009; 21: 2849-2864.
2. Tu Y, Graham MJ, Van Horn RM, Chen E, Fan X, Chen X, Zhou Q, Wan X, Harris FW, Cheng SZD. Controlled organization of self-assembled rod-coil block copolymer micelles. Polymer 2009; 50: 5170-5174.
3. Koga T, Higuchi M, Kinoshita T, Higashi N. Controlled self-assembly of amphiphilic oligopeptides into shape-specific nanoarchitectures. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 1360-1367.
4. Kim B-S, Hong D-J, Bae J, Lee M. Controlled self-assembly of carbohydrate conjugate rod-coil amphiphiles for supramolecular multivalent ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 16333-16337.
5. Shimizu T, Masuda M, Minamikawa H. Supramolecular nanotube architectures based on amphiphilic molecules. Chem. Rev. 2005; 105: 1401-1443.
6. Mann S. Self-assembly and transformation of hybrid nanoscale objects under equilibrium and non-equilibrium conditions. Nature Mater. 2009; 8: 781-792.
7. Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science 2001; 294: 1684-1688.
8. Han S; Cao S, Wang Y, Wang J, Xia D, Xu H, Zhao X, Lu JR. Self-assembly of short peptide amphiphiles: the cooperative effect of hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bonding. Eur. J. Chem. 2011; 17: 13095-13102.
9. Woolfson DN, Mahmoud ZN. More than just bare scaffolds: towards multi-component and decorated fibrous biomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010; 39: 3464-3479.
10. Zhang J, Li S, Li X, Li X, Zhu K. Morphology modulation of polymeric assemblies by guest drug molecules: TEM study and compatibility evaluation. Polymer 2009; 50: 1778-1789.
11. Kim SY, Lee KE, Han SS, Jeong B. Vesicle-to-spherical, micelle-to-tubular nanostructure transition of monomethoxy-poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (trimethylene carbonate) diblock copolymer. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008; 112: 7420-7423.
12. Yan X, He Q, Wang, K, Duan L, Cui Y, Li J. Transition of cationic dipeptide nanotubes into vesicles and oligonucleotide delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 2431-2434.
13. Park C, Lee IH, Lee S, Song Y, Rhue M, Kim C. Cyclodextrin-covered organic nanotubes derived from self-assembly of dendrons and their supramolecular transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006; 103: 1199-1203.
14. Gazit E. Self-assembled peptide nanostructures: the design of molecular building blocks and their technological utilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007; 36: 1263-1269.
15. Ulijn RV, Smith AM. Designing peptide based nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008; 37: 664-675.
16. Zhang S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003; 21: 1171-1178.
17. Lim YB, Moon KS, Lee M. Recent advances in functional supramolecular nanostructures assembled from bioactive building blocks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009; 38: 925-934.
18. Lim Y-B, Lee M. Toroidal β-barrels from self-assembling β-sheet peptides. J. Mater. Chem. 2011; 21: 11680-11685.
19. Hamley IW. Peptide fibrillization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 8128-8147.
20. Mishra A, Panda JJ, Basu A, Chauhan VS. Nanovesicles based on self-assembly of conformationally constrained aromatic residue containing amphiphilic dipeptides. Langmuir 2008; 24: 4571-4576.
21. Ueda M, Makino A, Imai T, Sugiyama J, Kimura S. Tubulation on peptide vesicles by phase-separation of a binary mixture of amphiphilic right-handed and left-handed helical peptides. Soft Matter 2011; 7: 4143-4146.
22. Kwon S, Shin HS, Gong J, Eom J-H, Jeon A, Yoo SH, Chung IS, Cho SJ, Lee H-S. Self-assembled peptide architecture with a tooth shape: folding into shape. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 17618-17621.
23. Khoe U, Yang Y, Zhang S. Self-assembly of nanodonut structure from a cone-shaped designer lipid-like peptide surfactant. Langmuir 2009; 25: 4111-4114.
24. Görbitz CH. Nanotube formation by hydrophobic dipeptides. Chem. Eur. J. 2001; 7: 5153-5159.
25. Görbitz CH. Nanotubes from hydrophobic dipeptides: pore size regulation through side chain substitution. New J. Chem. 2003; 27: 1789-1793.
26. Görbitz CH, Nilsen M, Szeto K, Tangen LW. Microporous organic crystals: an unusual case for L-leucyl-L-serine. Chem. Commun. 2005; 4288-4290.
27. Kol N, Adler-Abramovich L, Barlam D, Shneck RZ, Gazit E, Rousso I. Self-assembled peptide nanotubes are uniquely rigid bioinspired supramolecular structures. Nano Lett. 2005; 5: 1343-1346.
28. Niu L, Chen X, Allen S, Tendler SJB. Using the bending beam model to estimate the elasticity of diphenylalanine nanotubes. Langmuir 2007; 23: 7443-7446.
29. Reches M, Gazit E. Controlled patterning of aligned self-assembled peptide nanotubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006; 1: 195-200.
30. Reches M, Gazit E. Formation of closed-cage nanostructures by self-assembly of aromatic dipeptides. Nano Lett. 2004; 4: 581-585.
31. Gour N, Verma S. Bending of peptide nanotubes by focused electron and ion beams. Soft Matter. 2009; 5: 1789-1791.
32. Ghosh S, Verma S. Templated growth of hybrid structures at the peptide-peptide interface. Chem. Eur. J. 2008; 14: 1415-1419.
33. Ghosh S, Reches M, Gazit E, Verma S. Bioinspired design of nano-cages by self-assembling triskelion peptide elements. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 119: 2002-2004.
34. Joshi KB, Verma S. Ditryptophan conjugation triggers conversion of biotin fibers into soft spherical structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 2860-2863.
35. See Supporting Information.
36. Gour N, Purohit CS, Verma S, Puri R, Ganesh S. Mannosylated self-assembled structures for molecular confinement and gene delivery applications. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009; 378: 503-506.
37. Sundari CS, Balasubramanian D. Hydrophobic surfaces in saccharide chains. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 1997; 67: 183-216.
38. Janado M, Yano Y. The nature of the co-solvent effects on the aqueous solubilities of hydrocarbons. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985; 58: 1913-1917.
39. Rini JM, Hardman KD, Einspahr H, Suddath FL, Carver JP. X-ray crystal structure of a pea lectin-trimannoside complex at 2.6 Å resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 10126-10132.
40. Ryu J, Lee E, Lim Y, Lee M. Carbohydrate-coated supramolecular structures: transformation of nanofibers into spherical micelles triggered by guest encapsulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 4808-4814.
41. Osaki F, Kanamori T, Sando S, Sera T, Aoyama Y. A quantum dot conjugated sugar ball and its cellular uptake. On the size effects of endocytosis in the subviral region. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 6520-6521.
42. Gestwicki JE, Kiessling LL. Inter-receptor communication through arrays of bacterial chemoreceptors. Nature 2002; 415: 81-84.
43. Lundquist JJ, Toone EJ. The cluster glycoside effect. Chem. Rev. 2002; 102: 555-578.
44. Espuelas S, Haller P, Schuber F, Frisch B. Synthesis of an amphiphilic tetraantennary mannosyl conjugate and incorporation into liposome carriers. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003; 13: 2557-2560.
45. Wolfenden M, Cloninger M. Carbohydrate-functionalized dendrimers to investigate the predictable tunability of multivalent interactions. Bioconj. Chem. 2006; 17: 958-966.
46. Rillahan CD, Paulson JC. Glycan microarrays for decoding the glycome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011; 80: 797-823.
47. Smith DF, Song X, Cummings RD. Use of glycan microarrays to explore specificity of glycan-binding proteins. Methods Enzymol. 2010; 480: 417-444.
48. Jayaraman N. Multivalent ligand presentation as a central concept to study intricate carbohydrate-protein interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009; 38: 3463-3483.
49. 24 molecular spheres that form aggregates by multi-interaction with proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 3816-3817.
50. Fujimoto T Shimizu C, Hayashida O, Aoyama Y. Ternary complexation involving protein. Molecular transport to saccharide-binding proteins using macrocyclic saccharide cluster as specific transporter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 601-602.
51. Zanini D, Roy R. Synthesis of new R-thiosialodendrimers and their binding properties to the sialic acid specific lectin from Limax flavus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 2088-2095.
52. Aoi K, Itoh K, Okada M. Globular carbohydrate macromolecule "Sugar Balls". 1. Synthesis of novel sugar-persubstituted poly (amido amine) dendrimers. Macromolecules 1995; 28: 5391-5393.
53. Gour N, Verma S. Synthesis and AFM studies of lectin-carbohydrate self-assemblies. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 7331-7337.
54. Laurent N, Voglmeir J, Flitsch SL. Glycoarrays-tools for determining protein-carbohydrate interactions and glycoenzyme specificity. Chem. Commun. 2008; 4400-4412.
55. Park S, Lee M-R, Shin I. Carbohydrate microarrays as powerful tools in studies of carbohydrate-mediated biological processes. Chem. Commun. 2008; 4389-4399.
56. Kim BS, Yang WY, Ryu JH, Yoo YS, Lee M. Carbohydrate-coated nanocapsules from amphiphilic rod-coil molecule: binding to bacterial type 1 pili. Chem. Commun. 2005; 2035-2037.