A neural strategy for the inference of SH3 domain-peptide interaction specificity

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL.4, 2005, Pages

  Ferraro, Enrico ^a   Via, Allegra ^a   Ausiello, Gabriele ^a   Helmer Citterich, Manuela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT APPROACHES; NEURAL CLASSIFIERS; NEURAL NETWORK MODEL; PEPTIDE RECOGNITION; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; REGULAR EXPRESSIONS; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION;

BENCHMARKING; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); EXPERIMENTS; PATTERN MATCHING;

PEPTIDES;

PROTEIN SH3; LIGAND; PEPTIDE; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; POLYPROLINE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PREDICTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAIN;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS;

EID: 33947315301     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S4-S13     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kay BK, Williamson MP, SudoT M: The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J 2000, 14:231-241.
2. Musacchio A: How SH3 domains recognize proline. Adv Protein Chem 2002, 61:211-68.
3. Mayer BC: SH3 domains: complexity in moderation. J Cell Sci 2001, 114:1253-63.
4. Sudol M: From Src Homology domains to other signaPling modules: proposal of the 'protein recognition code'. Oncogene 1998, 17:1469-1474.
5. Feng S, Chen J, Yu H, Simmon J, Schreiber S: Two binding orientations for peptides to the Src SH3 domain: Development of a general model for SH3-ligand interactions. Science 1994, 266:1241-1247.
6. Lim WA, Richards FM, Fox RO: Structural determinants of peptide-binding orientation and of sequence specificity in SH3 domains. Nature 1994, 372(6504):375-9.
7. Landgraf C, Panni S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Castagnoli L, Schneider-Mergener J, Volkmer-Engert R, Cesareni G: Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLOS Biol 2004, 2:E14.
8. Cesareni G, Panni S, Nardelli G, Castagnoli L: Can we infer peptide recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains? FEBS Letters 2002, 513:38-44.
9. Sparks AB, Rider JE, Hoffman NG, Fowlkes DM, Quillam LA, Kay BK: Distinct ligand preferences of Src homology 3 domains from Src, Yes, Abl, Cortactin, p53bp2, PLCgamma, Crk, and Grb2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93(4):1540-4.
10. Tong AH, Drees B, Nardelli G, Bader GD, Brannetti B, Castagnoli L, Evangelista M, Ferracuti S, Nelson B, Paoluzi S, Quondam M, Zucconi A, Hogue CW, Fields S, Boone C, Cesareni G: A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 2002, 295(5553):321-4.
11. Brannetti B, Via A, Cestra G, Cesareni G, Helmer-citterich M: SH3-SPOT: and algorithm to predict preferred ligands to different members of the SH3 gene family. J Mol Biol 2000, 298(2):313-328.
12. Bock JR, Gough DA: Predicting protein-protein interactions from primary structure. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:455-460.
13. Martin S, Roe D, Faulon JL: Predicting protein-protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(2):218-226.
14. Baldi P, Brunak S: Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach MIT Press; 1998.
15. Wu CH: Artificial neural networks for molecular sequence analysis. Comput Chem 1997, 21(4):237-256.
16. Reiss DJ, Schwikowski B: Predicting protein-peptide interactions via a network-based motif sampler. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(Suppl 1):I274-I282.
17. The Saccaromyces Genome Database [http://www.yeastgenome.org/]
18. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG: Embedding strategies for effective use of information from multiple sequence alignments. Protein Sci 1997, 6(3):698-705.
19. EMBOSS [http://emboss.sourceforge.net/]