Comparative proteomic analysis of liver mitochondrial proteins derived from cloned adult pigs reconstructed with meishan pig fibroblast cells and european pig enucleated oocytes

Journal of Reproduction and Development

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 248-253

  Takeda, Kumiko ^a   Tasai, Mariko ^a   Iwamoto, Masaki ^b   Oe, Mika ^a   Chikuni, Koichi ^a   Nakamura, Yoshiaki ^a,c   Tagami, Takahiro ^a   Nirasawa, Keijiro ^a   Hanada, Hirofumi ^d   Pinkert, Carl A ^e   Onishi, Akira ^f  

^a NARO Food Research Institute   (Japan)

^b Prime Tech Ltd   (Japan)

^c SHINSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Japan)

^e AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

2 D DIGE; Liver; Mitochondrial protein; Pig; Somatic cell nuclear transfer

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; INBRED STRAIN; LIVER MITOCHONDRION; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OOCYTE; PROTEIN DATABASE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SWINE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL; TWO DIMENSIONAL DIFFERENCE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; ANIMALS, INBRED STRAINS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; DATABASES, PROTEIN; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MITOCHONDRIA, LIVER; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; OOCYTES; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SUS SCROFA; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TWO-DIMENSIONAL DIFFERENCE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

EID: 84861210356     PISSN: 09168818     EISSN: 13484400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.11-074A     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Wakayama T. Production of cloned mice and ES cells from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer: how to improve cloning efficiency? JReprod Dev 2007; 53: 13-26.
2. Niemann H, Tian XC, King WA, Lee RS. Epigenetic reprogramming in embryonic and foetal development upon somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning. Reproduction 2008; 135: 151-163.
3. Dinnyes A, Tian XC, Yang X. Epigenetic regulation of foetal development in nuclear transfer animal models. Reprod Domest Anim 2008; 43(Suppl 2): 302-309.
4. Hiendleder S, Zakhartchenko V, Wolf E. Mitochondria and the success of somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning: from nuclear-mitochondrial interactions to mitochondrial complementation and mitochondrial DNA recombination. Reprod Fertil Dev 2005; 17: 69-83.
5. Bowles EJ, Campbell KH, St John JC. Nuclear transfer: preservation of a nuclear genomc at the expense of its associated mtDNA genome(s). Curr Top Dev Biol 2007; 77: 251-290.
6. Takeda K, Tasai M, Akagi S, Matsukawa K, Takahashi S, Iwamoto M, Srirat-tana K, Onishi A, Tagami T, Nirasawa K, Hanada H, Pinkert CA. Microinjection of serum-starved mitochondria derived from somatic cells affects parthenogenetic development of bovine and murine oocytes. Mitochondrion 2010; 10: 137-142.
7. Wallace DC. Mitochondrial diseases in man and mouse. Science 1999; 283: 1482-1488.
8. Pinkert CA, Trouoce IA. Production of transmitochondrial mice. Methods 2002; 26: 348-357.
9. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H. Perry AC. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 2000; 289: 1188-1190.
10. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KH. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 2000; 407: 86-90.
11. St John JC, Facucho-Oliveira J, Jiang Y, Kelly R, Salah R. Mitochondrial DNA transmission, replication and inheritance: a journey from the gamete through the embryo and into offspring and embryonic stem cells. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 488-509.
12. Hiendleder S, Prelle K, Bruggerhoff K, Reichenbach HD, Wenigerkind H, Beb-bere D, Stojkovic M, Muller S, Brem G, Zakhartchenko V, Wolf E. Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions affect in utero developmental capacity, phenotype, and cellular metabolism of bovine nuclear transfer fetuses. Biol Reprod 2004; 70: 1196-1205.
13. Jiao F, Yan JB, Yang X., Li H, Wang Q, Huang SZ, Zeng F, Zeng YT. Effect of oocyte mitochondrial DNA haplotype on bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency. MolReprod Dev 2007; 74: 1278-1286.
14. Yan ZH, Zhou YY, Fu J, Jiao F, Zhao LW, Guan PF, Huang SZ, Zeng Y., Zeng F. Donor-host mitochondrial compatibility improves efficiency of bovine somatic cell nucleartransfer. BMCDevBiol 2010; 10: 31.
15. Gómez MC, Pope CE, Ricks DM, Lyons J, Dumas C, Dresser BL. Cloning endangered felids using heterospecific donor oocytes and interspecies embryo transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev 2009; 21: 76-82.
16. Iwamoto M, Kikuchi T, Fuchimoto D, Suzuki S, Nagai T, Hashimoto M, Yazaki S, Hanada H, Onishi A. Improvements in efficiency of cloning pigs from somatic cells. Jpn JSwine Sci 2003; 41: 185-192.
17. Park MR, Cho SK, Lee SY, Choi YJ, Park JY, Kwon DN, Son WJ, Paik SS, Kim T, Han YM, Kim JH. A rare and often unrecognized cerebromeningitis and hemodynamic disorder: a major cause of sudden death in somatic cell cloned piglets. Proteomics 2005; 5: 1928-1939.
18. Lee SY, Park JY, Choi YJ, Cho SK, Ahn JD, Kwon DN, Hwang KC, Kang SJ, Paik SS, Seo HG, Lee HT, Kim JH. Comparative proteomic analysis associated with term placental insufficiency in cloned pig. Proteomics 2007; 7: 1303-1315.
19. Chae JI, Cho YK, Cho SK, Kim JH, Han YM, Koo DB, Lee KK. Proteomic analysis of pancreas derived from adult cloned pig. Biochem Biophys Res Commmmun 2008; 366: 379-387.
20. Park JY, Kim JH, Choi YJ, Hwang KC, Cho SK, Park HH, Paik SS, Kim T, Park C, Lee HT, Seo HG, Park SB, Hhwang S. Comparative proteomic analysis of malformed umbilical cords from somatic cell nuclear transfer-derived piglets: implications for early postnatal death. BMC Genomics 2009; 10: 511.
21. Unlü M, Morgan ME, Minden JS. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 1997; 18: 2071-2077.
22. Marouga R, David S, Hawkins E. The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology. Anal Bioanal Chem 2005; 382: 669-678.
23. Hagner-McWhirter A, Winkvist M, Bourin S, Marouga R. Selective labelling of cell-surface proteins using CyDye DIGE Fluor minimal dyes. J Vis Exp 2008; 21: 945.
24. Iwamoto M, Kikuchi T, Akita T, Takeda K, Hlanada H, Hashimoto M, Suzuki S, Fuchimoto D, Nagai T, Onishi A. Live cloned pigs generated from nuclear transferred embryos encapsulated with sodium alginate. In: Proceedings of the Annual conference of the International Embryo Transfer Society. 2003: Auckland, New Zealand. 261.
25. Takeda K, Tasai M, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Tagami T, Nirasawa K, Hanada H, Onishi A. Transmission of mitochondrial DNA in pigs and progeny derived from nuclear transfer of Meishan pig fibroblast cells. Mol Reprod Dev 2006; 73: 306-312.
26. Takeda K, Tasai M, Akagi S, Watanabe S, Oe M, Chikuni K, Ohnishi-Kameya-ma M, Hanada H, Nakamura Y, Tagami T, Nirasawa K. Comparison of liver mitochondrial proteins derived from newborn cloned calves and from cloned adult cattle by two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis. Mol Reprod Dev 2011; 78: 263-273.
27. Chang J, Cornell JE, Van Remmen H, Hakala K, Ward WF, Richardson A. Effect of aging and caloric restriction on the mitochondrial proteome. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007; 62: 223-234.
28. Mi J, Garcia-Arcos I, Alvarez R, Cristobal S. Age-related subproteomic analysis of mouse liver and kidney peroxisomes. Proteome Sci 2007; 5: 19.
29. Pinkert CA, Smith LC, Trounce IA. Transgenic animals: Mitochondrial genome modification. in: Ullrey DE, Baer CK, Pond WG (eds.), Encyclopedia of Animal Science, 2nd ed. New York: Dekkar, Taylor & Francis; 2010: 1044-1046.
30. Mastromonaco GF, King WA. Cloning in companion animal, non-domestic and endangered species: can the technology become a practical reality? Reprod Fertil Dev 2007; 19: 748-761.
31. Loi P, Galli C, Ptak G. Cloning of endangered mammalian species: any progress? Trends Biotechnol 2007; 25: 195-200.
32. Tamassia M, Nuttinck F, May-Panloup P, Reynier P, Heyman Y, Charpigny G, Stojkovic M, Hiendleder S, Renard JP, Chastant-Maillard S. In vitro embryo production efficiency in cattle and its association with oocyte adenosine triphosphate content, quantity of mitochondrial DNA, and mitochondrial DNA haplogroup. Biol Reprod 2004; 71: 697-704.
33. Yan H, Yan Z, Ma Q, Jiao F, Huang S, Zeng F, Zeng Y. Association between mitochondrial DNA haplotype compatibility and increased efficiency of bovine intersubspecies cloning. J Genet Genomics 2011; 38: 21-28.
34. Schatten H, Prather RS, Sun QY. The significance of mitochondria for embryo development in cloned farm animals. Mitochondrion 2005; 5: 303-321.
35. Kim HR, Kang JK, Yoon JT, Seong HH, Jung JK, Lee HM, Sik Park C, Jin DI. Protein profiles of bovine placenta derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Proteomics 2005: 5: 4264-4273.
36. Adams SH, Alho CS, Asins G, Hegardt FG, Marrero PF. Gene expression of mitochondrial 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase in a poorly ketogenic mammal: effect of starvation during the neonatal period of the piglet. Biochem J 1997; 324(Pt 1): 65-73.