Donor-host mitochondrial compatibility improves efficiency of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer

BMC Developmental Biology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Yan, Zhong Hai ^a   Zhou, Yi Ye ^a   Fu, Jing ^a   Jiao, Fei ^a   Zhao, Lei Wen ^a   Guan, Peng Fei ^a   Huang, Shu Zhen ^a   Zeng, Yi Tao ^a   Zeng, Fanyi ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOS; BOVINAE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CATTLE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; GENETICS; HISTONE CODE; METABOLISM; MITOCHONDRION; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREGNANCY; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CATTLE; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HISTONE CODE; MITOCHONDRIA; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; PREGNANCY;

EID: 77951534158     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471213X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-31     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Cloning: eight years after Dolly. KH Campbell, et al. Reprod Domest Anim 2005 40 4 256 68 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00591.x 16008756
2. Abnormal gene expression in cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell and cumulus cell nuclei. D Humpherys, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99 20 12889 94 10.1073/pnas.192433399 12235366
3. Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome. WM Rideout III K Eggan R Jaenisch, Science 2001 293 5532 1093 8 10.1126/science.1063206 11498580 (Pubitemid 32758082)
4. The many faces of histone lysine methylation. M Lachner T Jenuwein, Curr Opin Cell Biol 2002 14 3 286 98 10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00335-6 12067650 (Pubitemid 34626966)
5. G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis. M Tachibana, et al. Genes Dev 2002 16 14 1779 91 10.1101/gad.989402 12130538 (Pubitemid 34803894)
6. Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos. F Santos, et al. Curr Biol 2003 13 13 1116 21 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00419-6 12842010 (Pubitemid 36815259)
7. Bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer using recipient oocytes recovered by ovum pick-up: effect of maternal lineage of oocyte donors. K Bruggerhoff, et al. Biol Reprod 2002 66 2 367 73 10.1095/biolreprod66.2.367 11804950 (Pubitemid 34101832)
8. Evidence of oocyte donor cow effect over oocyte production and embryo development in vitro. M Tamassia, et al. Reproduction 2003 126 5 629 37 10.1530/rep.0.1260629 14611636 (Pubitemid 37540623)
9. In vitro embryo production efficiency in cattle and its association with oocyte adenosine triphosphate content, quantity of mitochondrial DNA, and mitochondrial DNA haplogroup. M Tamassia, et al. Biol Reprod 2004 71 2 697 704 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026104 15084486 (Pubitemid 38970549)
10. Effects of culture medium and protein supplementation on mRNA expression of in vitro produced bovine embryos. MN Purpera AM Giraldo CB Ballard D Hylan RA Godke KR Bondioli, Mol Reprod Dev 2009 76 8 783 93 10.1002/mrd.21028 19288542
11. The dynamics of gene products fluctuation during bovine pre-hatching development. I Gilbert S Scantland EL Sylvestre C Gravel I Laflamme MA Sirard C Robert, Mol Reprod Dev 2009 76 8 762 72 10.1002/mrd.21030 19343787
12. Epigenetic reprogramming throughout preimplantation development and consequences for assisted reproductive technologies. C Wrenzycki D Herrmann A Lucas-Hahn C Gebert K Korsawe E Lemme JW Carnwath H Niemann, Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2005 75 1 1 9 10.1002/bdrc.20035 15838918 (Pubitemid 40604930)
13. Improved efficiency of bovine cloning by autologous somatic cell nuclear transfer. XY Yang, et al. Reproduction 2006 132 5 733 9 10.1530/rep.1.01118 17071774
14. Nuclear transplantation, embryonic stem cells, and the potential for cell therapy. K Hochedlinger R Jaenisch, N Engl J Med 2003 349 3 275 86 10.1056/NEJMra035397 12867612 (Pubitemid 36859480)
15. Somatic cell nuclear transfer. I Wilmut, et al. Nature 2002 419 6907 583 6 10.1038/nature01079 12374931 (Pubitemid 38166359)
16. Early and delayed aspects of nuclear reprogramming during cloning. KE Latham, Biol Cell 2005 97 2 119 32 10.1042/BC20040068 15656778
17. Transcript profiling during preimplantation mouse development. F Zeng DA Baldwin RM Schultz, Dev Biol 2004 272 2 483 96 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.05.018 15282163 (Pubitemid 38988270)
18. RNA transcript profiling during zygotic gene activation in the preimplantation mouse embryo. F Zeng RM Schultz, Dev Biol 2005 283 1 40 57 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.03.038 15975430 (Pubitemid 40828841)
19. Effect of oocyte mitochondrial DNA haplotype on bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency. F Jiao, et al. Mol Reprod Dev 2007 74 10 1278 86 10.1002/mrd.20698 17290429 (Pubitemid 350195112)
20. Animal mitochondrial biogenesis and function: a regulatory cross-talk between two genomes. R Garesse CG Vallejo, Gene 2001 263 1-2 1 16 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00582-5 11223238 (Pubitemid 32167049)
21. Role of the mitochondrial genome in preimplantation development and assisted reproductive technologies. LC Smith J Thundathil F Filion, Reprod Fertil Dev 2005 17 1-2 15 22 10.1071/RD04084 15745628 (Pubitemid 40103661)
22. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. A Bird, Genes Dev 2002 16 1 6 21 10.1101/gad.947102 11782440 (Pubitemid 34049633)
23. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. E Li, Nat Rev Genet 2002 3 9 662 73 10.1038/nrg887 12209141 (Pubitemid 34984255)
24. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. W Reik W Dean J Walter, Science 2001 293 5532 1089 93 10.1126/science.1063443 11498579 (Pubitemid 32758081)
25. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. W Dean, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 24 13734 8 10.1073/pnas.241522698 11717434 (Pubitemid 33115967)
26. Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. YK Kang, et al. Nat Genet 2001 28 2 173 7 10.1038/88903 11381267
27. Limited demethylation leaves mosaic-type methylation states in cloned bovine pre-implantation embryos. YK Kang, et al. EMBO J 2002 21 5 1092 100 10.1093/emboj/21.5.1092 11867537
28. Differential recruitment of methylated CpG binding domains by the orphan receptor GCNF initiates the repression and silencing of Oct4 expression. P Gu, et al. Mol Cell Biol 2006 26 24 9471 83 10.1128/MCB.00898-06 17030610 (Pubitemid 44904439)
29. G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis. N Feldman, et al. Nat Cell Biol 2006 8 2 188 94 10.1038/ncb1353 16415856
30. Improving in vitro development of cloned bovine embryos with hybrid (Holstein-Chinese Yellow) recipient oocytes recovered by ovum pick up. XY Yang, et al. Theriogenology 2005 64 6 1263 72 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.11.026 16139603
31. Molecular analysis of cytoplasmic genetic variation in Holstein cows. DR Brown, et al. J Anim Sci 1989 67 8 1926 32 2571604
32. Comparison of Two Different Schemes of Once-weekly Ovum Pick Up in Dairy Heifers. XY Yang, et al. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2005 18 3 314 9
33. A simplified method for the reconstruction of fully competent mouse zygotes from adult somatic donor nuclei. Q Zhou L Boulanger JP Renard, Cloning 2000 2 1 35 44 10.1089/15204550050145111 16218844
34. Porcine sperm factor supports activation and development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos. JG Knott, et al. Biol Reprod 2002 66 4 1095 103 10.1095/biolreprod66.4.1095 11906930
35. High developmental rates of vitrified bovine oocytes following parthenogenetic activation, in vitro fertilization, and somatic cell nuclear transfer. A Dinnyes, et al. Biol Reprod 2000 63 2 513 8 10.1095/biolreprod63.2. 513 10906058 (Pubitemid 30639940)
36. Analysis of CpG islands of trophoblast giant cells by restriction landmark genomic scanning. J Ohgane, et al. Dev Genet 1998 22 2 132 40 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1998)22:2<132::AID-DVG3>3.0.CO;2-7 9581285 (Pubitemid 28211378)
37. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. SJ Clark, et al. Nucleic Acids Res 1994 22 15 2990 7 10.1093/nar/22.15.2990 8065911