Successful promotion or segregation from partnership? An examination of the "post-senior manager" position in public accounting and the implications for women's careers

Accounting Forum

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 122-133

  Almer, Elizabeth Dreike ^a   Lightbody, Margaret G ^c   Single, Louise E ^b  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Career progression; Gender; Partner; Upward mobility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861195859     PISSN: 01559982     EISSN: 14676303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Almer E., Cohen J., Single L. Factors affecting the choice to participate in flexible work arrangements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 2003, 22(1):69-91.
2. Almer E., Kaplan S. The effects of flexible work arrangements on stressors, burnout and behavioral job outcomes. Behavioral Research in Accounting 2002, 14:1-14.
3. Almer E., Lightbody M., Single L.E., Vigilante B. New leadership tracks in accounting firms: An alternative to the partnership. Current Issues in Auditing 2011, 5(1):A39-A53.
4. Alter J. Retaining women CPAs. Journal of Accountancy 1991, May, 50-52. 55.
5. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Survey on women's status and work/family issues in public accounting 1994, AICPA, New York, NY.
6. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Survey on women's status and work/family issues in public accounting 1997, AICPA, New York, NY.
7. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Women's summit conference: Staffing Survey Group B Firms 2005.
8. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) AICPA Work/Life and Women's Initiatives 2004 Research: A decade of changes in the accounting profession: Workforce trends and human capital practices 2006, AICPA, New York, NY.
9. Anderson-Gough F., Grey C., Robson K. "Helping them to forget...": The organizational embedding of gender relations in public audit firms. Accounting Organizations and Society 2005, 30:469-490.
10. Broadbent J., Kirkham L. Glass ceilings, glass cliffs or new worlds? Revisiting gender and accounting. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 2008, 21(4):465-473.
11. Burke S., Collins K.M. Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills. Women in Management Review 2001, 16(5):244-256.
12. Chen V. What women want: Partnership details 2010, Download at. http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2010/02/what-women-want.html.
13. Cohen J., Single L. An examination of the perceived impact of flexible work arrangements on professional opportunities in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 2001, 32:317-328.
14. Connor M., Hooks K., McGuire T. Gaining legitimacy for flexible work arrangements and career paths: The business case for public accounting and professional services firms. Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world 1997, Quorum, Westport, CN. S. Parasuraman, J. Greenhaus (Eds.).
15. Coolidge L., D'Angelo D. Family issues to shape the profession's future. The CPA Journal 1994, May, 16-21.
16. Crompton R. Gender and accountancy: A response to Tinker and Neimark. Accounting Organizations and Society 1987, 12(1):103-110.
17. CroweHorwath Crowe group announces new partners and directors 2007, Download at. https://www.crowehorwath.com/Crowe/News/detail.cfm?id=85.
18. Curriden M. No tears for two tiers... more and more firms are sure non-equity partner slots benefit everyone. Of Counsel 2001, April, 18-20.
19. Dalton D., Hill J., Ramsay R.J. Women as managers and partners: Context specific predictors of turnover in international public accounting firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 1997, 16(1):29-50.
20. Dambrin C., Lambert C. Mothering or auditing? The case of two Big Four in France. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 2008, 21(4):474-475.
21. Deloitte Deloitte announced historical milestone, tops 1,000 women partners, principals and directors 2009, Download at. http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/press/Press-Releases/press-release/d3e3cf6d88912210VgnVCM100000ba42f00aRCRD.htm.
22. Dillman D. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method 2000, Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
23. Dwyer P., Roberts R. The contemporary gender agenda of the US public accounting profession: Embracing feminism or maintaining empire?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2004, 15:159-177.
24. Evans D.M. Non-equity partnership: A flawed solution to the disproportionate advancement of women in private law firms. Women's Rights Law Reporter 2007, 28:93-106.
25. Gammie E., Gammie B., Matson M., Duncan F. Women of ICAS reaching the top: The demise of the glass ceiling 2007, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh.
26. Gammie E., Herbohn K., Whiting R. Women in accountancy: Prospects for partnership. CA Magazine 2010, December, 47-49.
27. Greenhouse S. Flex time flourishes in accounting industry. The New York Times 2011, Download at. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/08/business/08perks.html.
28. Grey C. On being a professional in a "Big Six" firm. Accounting Organizations and Society 1998, 23(5/6):569-587.
29. Henderson W.D. An empirical study of single-tier versus two-tier partnerships in the Am Law 200. North Carolina Law Review 2006, 84:1706-1709.
30. Hill K. Here's one way to reveal your firm's non-equity partners 2010, Download at. http://abovethelaw.com/2010/03/heres-one-way-to-reveal-your-firms-non-equity-partners/.
31. Hooks K.L. Gender effects and labor supply in public accounting: An agenda of research issues. Accounting Organizations and Society 1992, 17(3/4):343-366.
32. Hooks K.L., Cheramy S.J. Facts and myths about women CPAs: What firms don't know could hurt them. Journal of Accountancy 1994, October, 79-82. 84-86.
33. Hooks K.L., Thomas P.B., Stout W.D. Retention of women in public accounting: Directions for future research. Advances in Accounting 1997, 15:17-48.
34. Hopman H.A., Lord B.R. The glass ceiling and women in accounting: New Zealand experiences and perceptions. Paper presented at the interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting conference 2009.
35. Illinois CPA Society (ICPAS) Why hasn't anything significantly changed for women in public accounting leadership roles? 2009, Accessed on 28.01.10. http://www.icpas.org/hc-insight.aspx?id=8664&LangType=1033.
36. Inside Public Accounting (IPA) Non-equity partnerships increase as tiered systems become retention tools. Inside Public Accounting 2005, December, Accessed on 25.01.10. http://www.allbusiness.com/human-resources/compensation-bonuses/1061527-1.html.
37. Johnson E.N., Lowe D.J., Reckers P.M.J. Alternative work arrangements and perceived career success: Current evidence from the big four firms in the US. Accounting Organizations and Society 2008, 33:48-72.
38. Kirkham L., Loft A. Gender and the construction of the professional accountant. Accounting Organizations and Society 1993, 18(6):507-558.
39. Kornberger M., Carter C., Ross-Smith A. Changing gender domination in a Big Four accounting firm: Flexibility, performance and client service in practice. Accounting Organizations and Society 2010, 35(8):775-791.
40. Kumra S., Vinnicombe S. A study of the promotion to partner process in a professional services firm: How women are disadvantaged. British Journal of Management 2008, 19:S65-S74.
41. Lehman C.R. "Herstory" in accounting: The first eighty years. Accounting Organizations and Society 1992, 17(3/4):261-285.
42. Lightbody M. Turnover decisions of women accountants: Using personal histories to understood the relative influence of domestic obligations. Accounting History 2009, 14:55-78.
43. MacEwen B. The great de-leveraging 2009, Adam Smith, Esq, Accessed on 25.01.10. http://www.adamsmithesq.com/archives/2009/03/the_great_de-leveraging.html.
44. Maupin R. Why are there so few women accounting partners? Male and female accountants disagree. Managerial Auditing Journal 1993, 8(5):10-18.
45. Neuman W.L. Survey research. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches 2003, 263-307. Pearson Education, Boston, MA, (Chapter 10). 5th ed. W.L. Neuman (Ed.).
46. NAWL 2006 report: NAWL's first national survey on retention and promotion of women in law firms. Women Lawyers Journal 2006, 92(1):14-18. 40.
47. NAWL Report of the fourth annual national survey on retention and promotion of women in law firms 2009, The NAWL Foundation, Chicago, IL.
48. Note Why law firms cannot afford to maintain the mommy track. Harvard Law Review 1996, 109:1375-1392.
49. Ribstein L. Law firm leverage and non-equity partners 2009, Ideoblog (accessed on 25/01/10). http://busmovie.typepad.com/ideoblog/2009/03/law-firm-leverage-and-nonequity-partners.html.
50. Roberts J., Coutts J.A. Feminization and professionalization: A review of an emerging literature on the development of accounting in the United Kingdom. Accounting Organizations and Society 1992, 17(3/4):379-395.
51. Rogers M.E. Good business sense. Practical Accountant 2000, 33:64.
52. Satava D. The ABC's of becoming partner in a national firm. The New Accountant 2009, 733:20-24. 30.
53. Schwartz F.N. The competitive advantage. Journal of Accountancy 1996, February, 39-41.
54. Trapp M.W., Hermanson R.H., Turner D.H. Current perceptions of issues related to women employed in public accounting. Accounting Horizons 1989, 3(1):71-85.
55. Wallace P. Reasons women chartered accountants leave public accounting firms prior to achieving partnership status: A qualitiative analysis. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 2009, 26:179-196.
56. Weiss D.C. Are jobs of nonequity partners at risk? 2010, Accessed on 05.02.10. http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/are_jobs_of_nonequity_partners_at_risk/.