Use of sequential-batch fermentations to characterize the impact of mild hypothermic temperatures on the anaerobic stoichiometry and kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 109, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1735-1744

  Cruz, A L B ^a,b   Verbon, A J ^a   Geurink, L J ^a   Verheijen, P J T ^a   Heijnen, J J ^a,b   van Gulik, W M ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b GE Amsterdam   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anaerobic growth; Ratkowsky model; Sequential batches; Temperature

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; APPROPRIATE MODELS; ARRHENIUS LAW; BATCH GROWTH; BEST ESTIMATES; DATA RECONCILIATION; HYPOTHERMIC; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SEQUENTIAL BATCH; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCIES; TEMPERATURE SHIFT;

BYPRODUCTS; CARBON DIOXIDE; ECOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STOICHIOMETRY; TEMPERATURE;

YEAST;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BATCH FERMENTATION; BIOMASS; FUNGUS GROWTH; GROWTH RATE; INOCULATION; KINETICS; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SEQUENTIAL BATCH FERMENTATION; STOICHIOMETRY; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; CARBON DIOXIDE; FERMENTATION; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TEMPERATURE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84861184158     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24454     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abbott DA, Suir E, Duong G-H, de Hulster E, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. 2009. Catalase overexpression reduces lactic acid-induced oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Appl Environ Microbiol 75(8): 2320- 2325.
2. Bernaerts K, Servaes RD, Kooyman S, Versyck KJ, Van Impe JF. 2002. Optimal temperature input design for estimation of the square root model parameters: Parameter accuracy and model validity restrictions. Int J Food Microbiol 73: 145- 157.
3. Boulton R. 1980. The prediction of fermentation behavior by a kinetic model. Am J Enol Vitic 31(1): 40- 45.
4. Cipollina C, ten Pierick A, Canelas AB, Seifar RM, van Maris AJA, van Dam JC, Heijnen JJ. 2009. A comprehensive method for the quantification of the non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by GC-IDMS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 877(27): 3231- 3236.
5. Coleman MC, Fish R, Block DE. 2007. Temperature-dependent kinetic model for nitrogen-limited wine fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(18): 5875- 5884.
6. den Besten HM, Ingham CJ, van HV, Beerthuyzen MM, Zwietering MH, Abee T. 2007. Quantitative analysis of population heterogeneity of the adaptive salt stress response and growth capacity of Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(15): 4797- 4804.
7. Entian K-D, Kötter P. 2007. Yeast genetic strain and plasmid collections. In: Stansfield I, Stark MJR, editors. Yeast gene analysis. San Diego: Academic Press Ltd. p 629- 666.
8. Kovarova K, Zehnder AJ, Egli T. 1996. Temperature-dependent growth kinetics of Escherichia coli ML 30 in glucose-limited continuous culture. J Bacteriol 178(15): 4530- 4539.
9. Larsson C, Nilsson A, Blomberg A, Gustafsson L. 1997. Glycolytic flux is conditionally correlated with ATP concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A chemostat study under carbon- or nitrogen-limiting conditions. J Bacteriol 179(23): 7243- 7250.
10. Maier A, Völker B, Boles E, Fuhrmann G. 2002. Characterisation of glucose transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with plasma membrane vesicles (counter transport) and intact cells (initial uptake) with single Hxt1, Hxt2, Hxt3, Hxt4, Hxt6, Hxt7 or Gal2 transporters. FEMS Yeast Res 2(4): 539- 550.
11. Mashego MR, van Gulik WM, Vinke JL, Heijnen JJ. 2003. Critical evaluation of sampling techniques for residual glucose determination in carbon-limited chemostat culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Biotechnol Bioeng 83: 395- 399.
12. Ng H, Ingraham JL, Marr AG. 1962. Damage and derepression in Escherichia coli resulting from growth at low temperatures. J Bacteriol 84: 331- 339.
13. Panadero J, Pallotti C, Rodriguez-Vargas S, Randez-Gil F, Prieto JA. 2006. A downshift in temperature activates the high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway, which determines freeze tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J Biol Chem 281(8): 4638- 4645.
14. Phisalaphong M, Srirattana N, Tanthapanichakoon W. 2006. Mathematical modeling to investigate temperature effect on kinetic parameters of ethanol fermentation. Biochem Eng J 28(1): 36- 43.
15. Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. 1989. Kinetics of growth and glucose transport in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 8066. Yeast 5: 159- 165.
16. Postmus J, Canelas AB, Bouwman J, Bakker BM, van Gulik W, de Mattos MJT, Brul S, Smits GJ. 2008. Quantitative analysis of the high temperature-induced glycolytic flux increase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals dominant metabolic regulation. J Biol Chem 283(35): 23524- 23532.
17. Ratkowsky DA, Olley J, McMeekin TA, Ball A. 1982. Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. J Bacteriol 149(1): 1- 5.
18. Sauer U. 2001. Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 73: 129- 169.
19. Shaw MK. 1967. Effect of abrupt temperature shift on the growth of mesophilic and psychrophilic yeasts. J Bacteriol 93(4): 1332- 1336.
20. Tai SL, Daran-Lapujade P, Luttik MAH, Walsh MC, Diderich JA, Krijger GC, van Gulik WM, Pronk JT, Daran JM. 2007. Control of the glycolytic flux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown at low temperature: A multi-level analysis in anaerobic chemostat cultures. J Biol Chem 282(14): 10243- 10251.
21. van den Brink J, Canelas AB, van Gulik WM, Pronk JT, Heijnen JJ, de Winde JH, Daran-Lapujade P. 2008. Dynamics of glycolytic regulation during adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to fermentative metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(18): 5710- 5723.
22. van Derlinden E, Bernaerts K, Van Impe JF. 2008. Dynamics of Escherichia coli at elevated temperatures: Effect of temperature history and medium. J Appl Microbiol 104(2): 438- 453.
23. Verheijen PJT. 2003. Model selection: An overview of practices in chemical engineering. In: Asprey SP, Macchietto S, editors. Dynamic model development, methods, theory and applications, series: Computer-aided chemical engineering, 16. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 85- 104.
24. Wilderer PA, Irvine RL, Goronszy MC, Robert LI, Mervyn CG. 2001. General overview of SBR applications. In: Wilderer PA, Irvine RL, Goronszy MC, editors. Sequencing batch reactor technology. London: IWA Publishing. p 17- 26.