Opinions of prospective teachers about utilizing the 5E instructional model

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 411-422

  Metin, Mustafa ^a   Coskun, Kerem ^a   Birisci, Salih ^a   Yilmaz, Gül Kaleli ^b  

^a ARTVIN CORUH UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BAYBURT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

5E model; Cognitive learning theory; Constructivist approach; Learning theories; Prospective teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861161854     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Moon JAA. Handbook of Reflective and Experiental Learning. Routledge Falmer, London, 2004.
2. Brown AL. The advancement of learning. Educ Res, 1994;23:4-12.
3. Illeris K. Towards a contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning. Int J Lifelong Educ 2003;4:396-406.
4. Oflaz, A. Language training strategies for language learning used by prospective teachers at german teaching department. J Int Soc Res 2008;3:278-300.
5. Basaran I. Educational Psychology. Ankara: Kadi{dotless}oglu Press, 1992 [in Turkish].
6. Knowles M. The Adult Learner: a neglected species (4th edit.) Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1990.
7. ndEd.), 2009.
8. Craig R. The Psychology of Learning in the Classroom, New York: The McMillan Company Press, 1968.
9. Cepni S, Ayas A, Akdeniz A. Ozmen H, Yigit N, Ayvaci{dotless}, H. Kuramdan uygulamaya Fen ve Teknoloji Ogretimi, Pegema Yayincilik 4. Baski, Ankara, 2005 [in Turkish].
10. Piaget J, Elkind D. Six Pschological Studies. John Wiley, New York, 1967.
11. Ozmen H. Fen Ogretiminde Ogrenme Teorileri ve Teknoloji Destekli Yapilandirmaci (Constructivist) Ogrenme. Turkish Online J Educ Technol TOJET 2004;3:14 [in Turkish].
12. Bodner GM. Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. J Chem Educ 1986;63:873-878.
13. Vermette P, Foote C. Constructivist philosophy and cooperative learning practice towards integration and reconciliation in secondary classrooms. Am Second Educ 2001;30:26-37.
14. Savery JR, Duffy TM. Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Model. Center For Research on Learning and Technology retrieved from www.googlescholar.com, 2001.
15. Airasian WP, Walsh ME. Constructivist cautions. Phi Delta Kappan 1997:78:444-449.
16. Simsek N. Constructivist learning and a critical approach to teaching. Educ Sci Pract 2004;3:115-139.
17. Horstman B, White WG. Best practice teaching in college success courses: i{dotless}ntegrating best practice teaching methods into college success courses. J Teach Learn 2002;6:6-15.
18. Atkin JM, Karlplus R. Discovery or Invention.? Science Teacher. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2002.
19. Bybee RW, Taylor AJ, Gardner A, Scotter PV, Powell JC, Westbrook A Landes N. The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness and applications. Retrieved from http://www.bscs.org/pdf/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf, 2006
20. Yenilmez K, Ersoy M. Opinions of mathemactics teacher candidates towards applying 7E instructional model on computer aided environment. Int J Instruct 2008;1:49-60.
21. Bybee RW (Ed.). Learning Science and the Science of Learning. Virginia: NSTA Press, 2002.
22. Seyhan H, Morgil I. The effect of 5E learning model on teaching of asid-base topic in chemistry education. J Sci Educ 2007;2:120-123.
23. Ozsevgec T, Cepni S, Ozsevgec L. 5E modelinin kavram yanilgilarini gidermedeki etkililigi: kuvvet-hareket ornegi, 7. Ulusal fen bilimleri ve matematik eǧitimi kongresi, Gazi Univ Egit Fak:, Ankara, 2006 [in Turkish].
24. Ergin I. An Example of 5E model on the academic success recognition level of students: "Projectile Motion". Mehmet Akif Univ Educ Fac J 2009;18:11-26.
25. Ergin I, Kanli U, Unsal Y. An example for the effect of 5E model on the academic success and attitude levels of students': "Inclined Projectile Motion. J Turkish Sci Educ 2008;5:48-59.
26. Ergin I, Unsal Y, Tan M. Effect of 5E on students' academic achievement and attitude level: Horizontal throwing. Ahi Evran Univ Educ Fac J 2006;2:1-15.
27. thcirculatory system topic. Asia-Pacific Forum Sci Learn Teach 2008;9:1-11.
28. Balkan F. Fen Ogretiminde Olusturmaci Ogretim Yaklasiminin Akademik Basarî ve Tutuma Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. Master Thesis, Sakarya Universitesi, Sakarya, 2001 [in Turkish].
29. Kor AS. Ilkogretim 5. si{dotless}ni{dotless}f ogrencilerinde yasami{dotless}mi{dotless}zdaki elektrik" unitesinde gorulen kavram yanilgilarinin giderilmesinde butunlestirici ogrenme kuramina dayali gelistirilen materyallerin etkisi. Master Thesis. KTU, Trabzon, 2006 [in Turkish].
30. Saka A, Akdeniz AR. Genetik konusunda bilgisayar destekli materyal gelistirilmesi ve 5E modeline gore uygulanmasi. Turkish Onl. J Educ Technol TOJET 2006;5:129-135 [in Turkish].
31. Cepni S, Kucuk M, Bacanak A. Butunlestirici Ogrenme Yaklasimina Uygun Bir Ogretmen Rehber Materyali Gelistirme Calismasi: Hareket ve Kuvvet. XII. Egitim Bilimleri Kongresi. Marmara Universitesi, Istanbul, 2004, 1701-1724 [in Turkish].
32. Cepni S, Akdeniz, AR, Keser OF. Fen Bilimleri Ogretiminde Butunlestirici Ogrenme Kuramina Uygun Ornek Rehber Materyallerin Gelistirilmesi. TFD. 19. Fizik Kongresi, Fi{dotless}rat Universitesi, 26-29 Eylul, Elazig, 2000 [in Turkish].
33. Bayar F. Ilkogretim 5. Sinif Fen Bilgisi Ogretim Programinda Yer Alan Isi ve Isinin Maddedeki Yolculugu Unitesi ile Ilgili Butunlestirici Ogrenme Kuramina Uygun Etkinliklerinin Gelistirilmesi. Master Thesis, KTU, Trabzon, 2005 [in Turkish].
34. Saglam M. Ses ve isikk unitesine yonelik 5E etkinliklerinin gelistirilmesi ve etkililiginin degerlendirilmesi. Master Thesis, KTU, Trabzon, 2005 [in Turkish].
35. Metin M, Ozmen H. Si{dotless}ni{dotless}f ogretmeni adaylarinin yapisalci yaklasimin 5e modeline uygun etkinlikleri tasarlarken ve uygularken karsilastiklari sorunlar. Necatibey Egit Fak Elek Fen Mat Egit Derg 2009;3:94-123 [in Turkish].
36. Baskan Z, Alev N, Atasoy S. Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin 5e modelinin uygulamalari hakkindaki gorusleri. EDU7 2007;2:38-59 [in Turkish].
37. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sega, 1985,
38. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research (snd. ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1998.
39. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, Sage Publicat., 1998.
40. Metin M. The examinations of teachers' attitude towards performance assessment with respect to the different variables. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:269-284.
41. Gokdere M, Kucuk M, Cepni S. Fen Bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin yapi{dotless}salci{dotless} ogrenme yaklasimini kavrama ve uygulama seviyeleri uzerine bir calisma, VI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, Marmara Universitesi, Istanbul 2004 [in Turkish].
42. Bozdogan AE. Altuncekic A. Fen Bilgisi Ogretmen Adaylarinin 5E Ogretim Modelinin Kullani{dotless}labilirligi Hakkindaki Gorusleri. Kastam Egit Fak Derg 2007;15:579-590 [in Turkish].
43. Bogdan RC, Biklen SK. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1998.
44. Creswell JW. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, Merrill Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 2002.
45. Van Maanen J. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Univ. of Chicago Press, USA, 1988.
46. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd Edition). Calif.: SAGE Publications, 1994.
47. Sezen G, Birinci Konur K, Cimer A. Evaluation of Practices In Science And Technology Based On 5E Teaching Model In View Of Elementary ProspectiveTeachers. The First International Congress of Educational Research, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, 2009.
48. Er Nas S, Coruhlu Senel T, Cepni S. 5E modelinin derinlesme asamasina iliskin fen ve teknoloji ogretmenlerinin gorusleri: Trabzon Ili ornegi. Kastamonu Egit Derg 2009;17:967-982 [in Turkish]
49. Demircioǧlu G, Özmen H, Demircioǧlu H. Butunlestirici ogrenme kuramina dayali olarak gelistirilen etkinliklerin uygulanmasinin etkililiginin araştirilmasi. Turk Fen Egit Derg 2004;1:21-34 [in Turkish].
50. Horstman, B., White, W. G. Best Practice Teaching in College Success Courses: Integrating Best Practice Teaching Methods into College Success Courses. J Teach Learn 2002;6:6-15.
51. Richardson V. Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings, 3-14. London: The Falmer Press, 1997.
52. Saidur R, Lai YK. Nanotechnology in vehicle's weight reduction and associated energy savings. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part A 2011;26:87-101.
53. Inan HZ. Teaching science process skills in kindergarten. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:47-64.
54. Witrock M. Learning as a generative process. Educ Psycholog 1974:11:87-95.
55. Hand B, Treagust DF. Student achievement and science curriculum development using A constructivist framework. School Sci Math 1991;91:172-176.
56. Duffy TM, Jonassen DH. Constructivism: and the Teachnology of Instruction. New Jersey:Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
57. Tok H. Classroom instructional responsibilities and learner autonomy:A case study in Turkey. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:211-220.
58. Sahin C, Calik M, Cepni S. Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5E model: A sample teaching of liquid pressure. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:115-125.
59. Calik M. How did creating a constructivist learning environment influence my graduate students' views? Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:1-13.