Examining the hypothesis based learning approach

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 497-502

  Semerci, Cetin ^a  

^a FIRAT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Constructivism; Hypothesis based learning approach; Problem based learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861118782     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kaptan S. Bilimsel arastirma ve istatistik teknikler. Ankara: Teki{dotless}şi{dotless}k Web Ofset tesisleri, 1998[in Turkish].
2. Buyukozturk S, Cakmak EK, Akgun OE, Karadeniz S, Demirel F. Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayinlari, 2009[in Turkish].
3. Parsons R. Statistical analysis: A decision-making approach, Second edition, London, New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1998.
4. Kubiatko M, Vaculová I. Project-based learning: characteristic and the experiences with application in the science subjects. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:65-74.
5. Erden M. Egitim Bilimine Giris, Ankara: Arkadas Publication, 2007 [in Turkish].
6. Rios J. Using POE centers. Science scope 2002;25:26-29.
7. TDK. Buyuk Turkce Sozluk. 2009 Available from: http://www.tdkterim.gov.tr [in Turkish].
8. VanDorn K, Mavita M, Montes L, Ackerson BJ, Rockley M. Hypothesis-besed learning. Science Scope, 2004;27:24-25.
9. VanDorn K. Hypothesis-besed learning, Science Scope. 2005;29:57-58.
10. Hastly CE. Assessing the effectiveness of the HBL pedagogy. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma, 2005.
11. Hackmann DG. Constructivism and block scheduling: Making the connection. Phi Delta Kappan 2004;85:697-703.
12. Gibbons BA. Supporting elementary science education for English learners: A consructivist evaluation instrument. J Educ Res 2003;96:371-380.
13. Windschitl M. The challenges of sustaining a constructivist classroom culture. In K.M. Cauley, F. Linder, J.H. McMillan (Eds.), Educational Psychology (ss. 121-126). Dushkin: McGraw Hill, 2000.
14. Johnstone KM, Biggs SF. Problem-based learning: Introduction, analysis, and accounting curricula implications. J Account Educ 1998;16,407-427.
15. Ronteltap F, Eurelings A. Activity and interaction of students in an electronic learning environment for problem-based learning. Distance Educ 2002;23:11-22.
16. Elcin M. Ti{dotless}p eǧitiminde durum, sistemler ve yönelimler. Hacettepe Tip Derg 2000;31:370-372.
17. Peterson F, Eaguest D. Learning to teach primary science through problem based learning. Science Educ 1998;82:215-237.
18. Chin C, Chia L. Problem-Based Learning: Using Students' Questions to Drive Knowledge Construction. Sci Educ 2004;88:707-727.
19. Calik M. How did creating a constructivist learning environment influence my graduate students' views? Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:1-13.
20. Koral O. The effectiveness of problem-based learning supported with computer simulations on academic performance about buoyancy. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:293-304.
21. Saban A. Ogrenme Ogretme Sureci. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim, 2000 [in Turkish].
22. Sisman M. Ogretmenlige Giris. Pegem A Yayincilik 1999 [in Turkish].
23. Semerci N. Problem temelli öǧrenme ve öǧretmen yetiştirme. Milli Egitim 2005;33:248-256.
24. Driver R, Oldham V. A constructivist approach to curriculum development. Stud Sci Educ 1986;13:105-122.
25. Boddy, N., Watson, K., Aubusson, P. A trial of the five Es: A referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Res Sci Educ 2003;33:27-42.
26. Widodo A, Duit R., Müller C. Constructivist views of teaching and learning in practice: Teachers' views and classroom behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), New Orleans, 2002.
27. Saidur R, Lai YK. Nanotechnology in vehicle's weight reduction and associated energy savings. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part A 2011;26:87-101.
28. Bray MH. Leading in learning: An analysis of teachers' interactions with their colleagues as they implement a constructivist approach to learning. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 1998.
29. Dangel JR, Guyton E, McIntyre CB. Constructivist pedagogy in primary classrooms: Learning from teachers and their classrooms. J Ear Child Teac Educ 2003;24:237-245
30. Haney JJ, McArthur J. Four case studies of prospective science teachers' beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Sci Educ 2002;86:783-802.
31. Naylor S, Keogh B. Constructivism in classroom: Theory into practice. J Sci Teac Educ 1999;10:93-106