Activity and interaction of students in an electronic learning environment for problem-based learning

Distance Education

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 11-22

  Ronteltap, Frans ^a   Eurelings, Anneke ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27144514698     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910220123955     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Artzt, A. F., and Armour-Thomas, E., 1992. Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2): 137–175.
2. Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., and Traum, D., 1999. “ The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks ”. In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, Edited by: Dillenbourg, P., 31–63. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
3. Barrows, H. S., and Tamblyn, R. M., 1980. Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education, New York: Springer.
4. Boos, M., Scharpf, U., and Fisch, R., 1991. Eine Methode zur Analyse von Interaktionsprozessen beim Problemlösen und Entscheiden in Sitzungen [A method for the analysis of interactive processes in problem solving and decision making in group sessions]. Zeitschrift fuer Arbeits und Organisationspsychologie, 35(3): 115–121.
5. Brown, A. L., and Palincsar, A. S., 1989. “ Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition ”. In Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, Edited by: Resnick, L. B., 393–451. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reinman, P., and Glaser, R., 1989. 'Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13: 145–182.
7. Dillenbourg, P., 1999. “ What do you mean by "collaborative learning"? ”. In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, Edited by: Dillenbourg, P., 1–19. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
8. Duffy, T. M., and Cunningham, D. J., 1996. “ Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction ”. In Educational communications and technology, Edited by: Jonassen, D. H., 170–199. London: Prentice Hall.
9. Fairclough, N., 1995. “ Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis ”. In Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language, Edited by: Fairclough, N., 183–213. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
10. Garrison, J. W., 1994. Realism, Deweyan pragmatism and educational research. Educational Researcher, 23: 5–14.
11. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., and Anderson, T., 1997. Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4): 397–431.
12. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Greer, K., and Mackenzie, M., 1995. Peer collaboration and conceptual growth in physics: Task influences on children's understanding of heating and cooling. Cognition and Instruction, 13(4): 483–503.
13. Koschmann, T., 1996. “ Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction ”. In CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm, Edited by: Koschmann, T., 1–23. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., and Barrows, H. S., 1993. Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3): 227–264.
15. Kumpulainen, K., and Mutanen, M., 1999. The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9(5): 449–473.
16. Newman, D. R., Webb, B., and Cochrane, C., 1995. A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning Retrieved May 16, 2000, from http://www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/1995/n2/newman.txt
17. Ronteltap, C. F. M., and Eurelings, A. M. C., 1996. User requirement analysis of POLARIS, Maastricht: University of Maastricht.
18. Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C., 1993. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3): 265–283.
19. Schmidt, H. G., 1993. Problem-based learning: An introduction. Instructional Science, 22(4): 247–250.
20. Shute, V. J., and Psotka, J., 1996. “ Intelligent tutoring systems: past, present and future ”. In Educational communications and technology, Edited by: Jonassen, D. H., 570–601. London: Prentice Hall.
21. Spivey, N. N., 1997. The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning, San Diego: Academic Press.
22. Wertsch, J. V., 1998. Mind as action, New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Williams, S. M., 1992. Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(4): 367–427.