Managing port concessions: Evidence from Italy

Maritime Policy and Management

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-61

  Parola, Francesco ^a   Tei, Alessio ^b   Ferrari, Claudio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES PARTHENOPE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; PORT DEVELOPMENT; PORT OPERATION; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS;

ITALY;

EID: 84861116186     PISSN: 03088839     EISSN: 14645254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2011.642312     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. NOTTEBOOM, T. and VERHOEVEN, P., 2009, The awarding of seaport terminals to private operators: current practices and viewpoints in European ports. In Proceedings of IAME 2009 Conference, June 24-26, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2. VAN HOOYDONK, E., 2002, The regime of port authorities under European law including an analysis of the port services directive. In: European Seaports Law EU Law of Ports and Port Services and the Ports Package, edited by E. Van Hooydonk (Antwerpen/ Apeldoorn: Maklu), pp. 79-186.
3. PETSCHKE, M., 2008, Port services and Community law on public procurement and concessions. In Proceedings of ESPO 2008 Conference, Hamburg.
4. NOTTEBOOM, T., 2007, Concession agreements as port governance tool. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 437-455.
5. PALLIS, A., NOTTEBOOM, T. and DE LANGEN, P., 2008, Concession agreements, capabilities and market entry. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10, 209-228.
6. JUAN, C., OLMOS, F., CASASUS, T. and PEREREZ, J.C., 2005, Concession agreements in the shipping industry. Working paper, Instituto de Economia Internacional, University of Valencia.
7. VERHOEVEN, P., 2010, A review of port authority functions: Towards a renaissance? Maritime Policy and Management, 37, 247-270.
8. BICHOU, K. and BELL, M., 2007, Internalisation and consolidation of the container port industry: Assessment of channel structure and relationships. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9, 35-51.
9. BICHOU, K. and GRAY, R., 2005, A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 75-92.
10. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2004, Directive Proposal on Market Access to Port Services, COM(2004)654, Brussels.
11. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2001, Directive Proposal on Market Access to Port Services, COM(2001)35, Brussels.
12. MINISTERO DELLE INFRASTRUTTURE E DEI TRASPORTI, 2009, Relazione sull'attivita delle Autorita Portuali, Roma.
13. INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT AND MARITIME MANAGEMENT ANTWERP, 2008, The Awarding of Seaport Terminals in Europe: Results from ITMMA Survey Commissioned by ESPO, Antwerp.
14. RIGHETTI, G., 1987, Trattato di Diritto Marittimo (Milano: Giuffre Editore).
15. FERRARI, C. and MUSSO, E., 2011, Italian ports: Towards a new governance? Maritime Policy and Management, 38, 335-346.
16. THEYS, C. and NOTTEBOOM, T., 2009, The economics behind terminal concession duration in seaports. In Proceedings of IAME 2009 Conference, June 24-26, Copenhagen, Denmark.
17. MARCHESE, U., MUSSO, E. and FERRARI, C., 1998, The role for ports in intermodal transports and global competition: A survey of Italian container terminals. In: Transport Modes and System, Vol. 1, edited by H. Meersman, E. Van de Voorde and W. Winkelmans (Amsterdam: Pergamon), pp. 141-154.
18. FERRARI, C. and BASTA, M., 2009, Port concessions' fees based on the Price-Cap regulation: A DEA approach. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 11, 121-135.
19. HAEZENDONCK, E., VERBEKE, A. and COECK, C., 2006, Strategic positioning analysis for seaports. In: Research in Transportation Economics Port Economics, edited by K. Cullinane and W. K. Talley, Vol. 16 (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 141-169.
20. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 2004, Directive 2004/18/EC.
21. The two regulations have been introduced with almost 8 years of distance. The updating inflation of values determines 147 E/sqm for Genoa and 143 E/sqm for Livorno.