메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 156, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 728-735

How variability in the institutional review board review process affects minimal-risk multisite health services research

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COST; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; INTERNAL VALIDITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; RURAL AREA; URBAN AREA;

EID: 84861112351     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00011     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (46)

References (29)
  • 2
    • 13644266883 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Variations among institutional review board reviews in a multisite health services research study
    • Dziak K, Anderson R, Sevick MA, Weisman CS, Levine DW, Scholle SH. Variations among institutional review board reviews in a multisite health services research study. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:279-90.
    • (2005) Health Serv Res , vol.40 , pp. 279-290
    • Dziak, K.1    Anderson, R.2    Sevick, M.A.3    Weisman, C.S.4    Levine, D.W.5    Scholle, S.H.6
  • 3
    • 33644928770 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research
    • Green LA, Lowery JC, Kowalski CP, Wyszewianski L. Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research. Health Serv Res. 2006;41:214-30.
    • (2006) Health Serv Res , vol.41 , pp. 214-230
    • Green, L.A.1    Lowery, J.C.2    Kowalski, C.P.3    Wyszewianski, L.4
  • 4
    • 77649186879 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial
    • Stark AR, Tyson JE, Hibberd PL. Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial. J Perinatol. 2010;30:163-9.
    • (2010) J Perinatol , vol.30 , pp. 163-169
    • Stark, A.R.1    Tyson, J.E.2    Hibberd, P.L.3
  • 5
    • 0035116519 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial
    • Silverman H, Hull SC, Sugarman J. Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29:235-41.
    • (2001) Crit Care Med , vol.29 , pp. 235-241
    • Silverman, H.1    Hull, S.C.2    Sugarman, J.3
  • 6
    • 0034988768 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • MARC Investigators. Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial
    • Stair TO, Reed CR, Radeos MS, Koski G, Camargo CA; MARC Investigators. Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:636-41.
    • (2001) Acad Emerg Med , vol.8 , pp. 636-641
    • Stair, T.O.1    Reed, C.R.2    Radeos, M.S.3    Koski, G.4    Camargo, C.A.5
  • 7
    • 67349264564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • MIST Investigators. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter randomized, controlled surgical trial
    • Helfand BT, Mongiu AK, Roehrborn CG, Donnell RF, Bruskewitz R, Kaplan SA, et al; MIST Investigators. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter randomized, controlled surgical trial. J Urol. 2009;181:2674-9.
    • (2009) J Urol , vol.181 , pp. 2674-2679
    • Helfand, B.T.1    Mongiu, A.K.2    Roehrborn, C.G.3    Donnell, R.F.4    Bruskewitz, R.5    Kaplan, S.A.6
  • 8
    • 26844473083 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Variation in institutional review processes for a multisite observational study
    • Vick CC, Finan KR, Kiefe C, Neumayer L, Hawn MT. Variation in institutional review processes for a multisite observational study. Am J Surg. 2005; 190:805-9.
    • (2005) Am J Surg , vol.190 , pp. 805-809
    • Vick, C.C.1    Finan, K.R.2    Kiefe, C.3    Neumayer, L.4    Hawn, M.T.5
  • 10
    • 39549105385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Harming through protection?
    • Baily MA. Harming through protection? N Engl J Med. 2008;358:768-9.
    • (2008) N Engl J Med , vol.358 , pp. 768-769
    • Baily, M.A.1
  • 11
    • 84555178455 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: The state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform
    • Silberman G, Kahn KL. Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. Milbank Q. 2011;89:599-627.
    • (2011) Milbank Q , vol.89 , pp. 599-627
    • Silberman, G.1    Kahn, K.L.2
  • 12
    • 80052847587 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reforming the regulations governing research with human subjects
    • Emanuel EJ, Menikoff J. Reforming the regulations governing research with human subjects. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1145-50.
    • (2011) N Engl J Med , vol.365 , pp. 1145-1150
    • Emanuel, E.J.1    Menikoff, J.2
  • 14
    • 0038460302 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report
    • Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-72.
    • (2003) JAMA , vol.289 , pp. 2560-2572
    • Chobanian, A.V.1    Bakris, G.L.2    Black, H.R.3    Cushman, W.C.4    Green, L.A.5    Izzo Jr., J.L.6
  • 15
    • 80053435358 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trial of pay for performance for hypertension treatment: Study protocol
    • Petersen LA, Urech T, Simpson K, Pietz K, Hysong SJ, Profit J, et al. Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trial of pay for performance for hypertension treatment: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6:114.
    • (2011) Implement Sci , vol.6 , pp. 114
    • Petersen, L.A.1    Urech, T.2    Simpson, K.3    Pietz, K.4    Hysong, S.J.5    Profit, J.6
  • 16
    • 62449200223 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Method to develop health care peer groups for quality and financial comparisons across hospitals
    • Byrne MM, Daw CN, Nelson HA, Urech TH, Pietz K, Petersen LA. Method to develop health care peer groups for quality and financial comparisons across hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:577-92.
    • (2009) Health Serv Res , vol.44 , pp. 577-592
    • Byrne, M.M.1    Daw, C.N.2    Nelson, H.A.3    Urech, T.H.4    Pietz, K.5    Petersen, L.A.6
  • 17
    • 33646000796 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Genetics. No longer de-identified
    • McGuire AL, Gibbs RA. Genetics. No longer de-identified. Science. 2006; 312:370-1.
    • (2006) Science , vol.312 , pp. 370-371
    • McGuire, A.L.1    Gibbs, R.A.2
  • 18
    • 33745662181 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve institutional review board approval
    • Greene SM, Geiger AM. A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve institutional review board approval. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:784-90.
    • (2006) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.59 , pp. 784-790
    • Greene, S.M.1    Geiger, A.M.2
  • 21
    • 1642453693 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The cost of institutional review board procedures in multicenter observational research [Letter]
    • Humphreys K, Trafton J, Wagner TH. The cost of institutional review board procedures in multicenter observational research [Letter]. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:77.
    • (2003) Ann Intern Med , vol.139 , pp. 77
    • Humphreys, K.1    Trafton, J.2    Wagner, T.H.3
  • 22
    • 79151474125 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Health service research: The square peg in human subjects protection regulations
    • Gittner LS, Roach MJ, Kikano G, Grey S, Dawson NV. Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations. J Med Ethics. 2011;37:118-22.
    • (2011) J Med Ethics , vol.37 , pp. 118-122
    • Gittner, L.S.1    Roach, M.J.2    Kikano, G.3    Grey, S.4    Dawson, N.V.5
  • 23
    • 65649154002 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The neglected purpose of comparative-effectiveness research
    • Naik AD, Petersen LA. The neglected purpose of comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1929-31.
    • (2009) N Engl J Med , vol.360 , pp. 1929-1931
    • Naik, A.D.1    Petersen, L.A.2
  • 24
    • 77949418691 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Local institutional review board (IRB) review of a multicenter trial: Local costs without local context
    • Ravina B, Deuel L, Siderowf A, Dorsey ER. Local institutional review board (IRB) review of a multicenter trial: local costs without local context. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:258-60.
    • (2010) Ann Neurol , vol.67 , pp. 258-260
    • Ravina, B.1    Deuel, L.2    Siderowf, A.3    Dorsey, E.R.4
  • 25
    • 58149121176 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: The ethics/scientific quality boundary examined
    • Angell EL, Bryman A, Ashcroft RE, Dixon-Woods M. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:131-6.
    • (2008) Qual Saf Health Care , vol.17 , pp. 131-136
    • Angell, E.L.1    Bryman, A.2    Ashcroft, R.E.3    Dixon-Woods, M.4
  • 27
    • 77954701958 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Changes in the institutional review board submission process for multicenter research over 6 years
    • Pogorzelska M, Stone PW, Cohn EG, Larson E. Changes in the institutional review board submission process for multicenter research over 6 years. Nurs Outlook. 2010;58:181-7.
    • (2010) Nurs Outlook , vol.58 , pp. 181-187
    • Pogorzelska, M.1    Stone, P.W.2    Cohn, E.G.3    Larson, E.4
  • 28
    • 77449109638 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Costs and benefits of the national cancer institute central institutional review board
    • Wagner TH, Murray C, Goldberg J, Adler JM, Abrams J. Costs and benefits of the national cancer institute central institutional review board. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:662-6.
    • (2010) J Clin Oncol , vol.28 , pp. 662-666
    • Wagner, T.H.1    Murray, C.2    Goldberg, J.3    Adler, J.M.4    Abrams, J.5
  • 29
    • 34347405502 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Notes from the field: Jumpstarting the IRB approval process in multicenter studies
    • Blustein J, Regenstein M, Siegel B, Billings J. Notes from the field: jumpstarting the IRB approval process in multicenter studies. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42:1773-82.
    • (2007) Health Serv Res , vol.42 , pp. 1773-1782
    • Blustein, J.1    Regenstein, M.2    Siegel, B.3    Billings, J.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.