Impact of IRB requirements on a multicenter survey of prophylactic mastectomy outcomes

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 275-278

  Greene, Sarah M ^a   Geiger, Ann M ^b   Harris, Emily L ^c   Altschuler, Andrea ^d   Nekhlyudov, Larissa ^e   Barton, Mary B ^e   Rolnick, Sharon J ^f   Elmore, Joann G ^g   Fletcher, Suzanne ^e  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^d DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^e HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE   (United States)

^f HEALTHPARTNERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics Committees; Multicenter Study; Survey Methodology

Indexed keywords

CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RESEARCH; COST; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MASTECTOMY; POSTAL MAIL; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33644950822     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. T.O. Stair, C.R. Reed, M.S. Radeos, G. Koski, C.A. Camargo, and MARC Investigators Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial Acad Emerg Med 8 2001 636 641
2. R. McWilliams, J. Hoover-Fong, A. Hamosh, S. Beck, T. Beaty, and G. Cutting Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study JAMA 290 2003 360 366
3. J.M. Hirshon, S.D. Krugman, M.D. Witting, J.P. Furuno, M.R. Limcangco, A.R. Perisse, and E.K. Rasch Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research Acad Emerg Med 9 2002 1417 1420
4. K.M. MacQueen, and J.W. Buehler Ethics, Practice, and Research in Public Health Am J Public Health 94 2004 928 931
5. E.C. Schneider, A.M. Epstein, J.L. Malin, K.L. Kahn, and E.J. Emanuel Developing a system to assess the quality of cancer care: ASCO's national initiative on cancer care quality J Clin Oncol 2004 Aug 1;22:2985-2991
6. A.H. Church Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: a meta-analysis Public Opin Q 57 1993 62 79
7. M.C. Christian, J.L. Goldberg, J. Killen, J.S. Abrams, M.S. McCabe, J.K. Mauer, and R.E. Wittes A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials N Engl J Med 346 2002 1405 1408
8. M.D. Thornquist, C. Edelstein, G.E. Goodman, and G.S. Omenn Streamlining IRB review in multisite trials through single-study IRB cooperative agreements: Experience of the Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) Control Clin Trials 23 2002 80 86
9. K. Jamrozik The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects J Med Ethics 26 2000 334 339
10. G.J. Annas Medical privacy and medical research - Judging the new federal regulations N Engl J Med 346 2002 216 220