|
Volumn 360, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 1929-1931
|
The neglected purpose of comparative-effectiveness research
a,c a,b,c |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIFIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;
ACUTE HEART INFARCTION;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DECISION MAKING;
FUNDING;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SHORT SURVEY;
ARTICLE;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ECONOMICS;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MANAGEMENT;
MASS COMMUNICATION;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION;
FINANCING, GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH POLICY;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
HUMANS;
POLICY MAKING;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
|
EID: 65649154002
PISSN: 00284793
EISSN: 15334406
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0902195 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (62)
|
References (5)
|