Has fertility declined in recent decades?

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 119-126

  Yoldemir, Tevfik ^a   Oral, Engin ^b  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

demography; fertility; fertility decline; pregnancy; total fertility rate

Indexed keywords

BIRTH RATE; CHILDBIRTH; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; EUROPE; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE FERTILITY; FERTILITY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; MALE FERTILITY; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UNITED NATIONS;

BIRTH RATE; CULTURAL EVOLUTION; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FERTILITY; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84861099155     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: 1473656X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835213f1     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Lutz W, Skirbekk V, Testa MR. The low fertility trap hypothesis: forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography; 2006. pp. 167-192.
2. Myrskylä M, Kohler HP, Billari FC. Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 2009;460:741-743.
3. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Female contraception over 40. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:599-612.
4. Gauthier A. The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialised countries: a review of the literature. Popul Res Policy Rev 2007;26:323-346.
5. Rychtarikova J. EU demographics: living more and reproducing less. In: Valverde JE, editor. 2050: a changing Europe. Demographic crisis and baby friend policies. Pharmaceuticals policy and law. Vol. 9. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2007. pp. 41-50, 1-2.
6. Bjorklund A. Does family policy affect fertility? Lessons from Sweden. J Popul Econ 2006;19:3-24.
7. Hoorens S, Gallo F, Cave J A K, Grant JC. Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? An assessment of the demographic and economic impact of ART in Denmark and UK. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2471-2475.
8. Atoh M. Review of population and social policy. 2001;10:1-21.
9. Hakim C. A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory. Popul Dev Rev 2010;29:349-377.
10. Vikat A. Women's labor force attachment and childbearing in Finland. Demographic Res 2004; SC3:1-38.
11. Englehart H, Kogel T, Prskawetz A. Fertility and women's employment reconsidered: a macro-level time-series analysis for developed countries, 1960-2000. Popul Stud 2004;58:109-120.
12. Duvander AZ, Lappegard T, Andersson G. Family policy and fertility: fathers' and mothers' use of parental leave and continued childbearing in Norway and Sweden. J Eur Soc Policy 2010;20:45-57.
13. Vitali A, Billari FC, Prskawetz A, Testa MR. Preference theory and low fertility: a comparative perspective. Eur J Popul 2009;25:413-438.
14. Billari FC, Liefbroer AC, Philipov D. The postponement of childbearing in Europe: driving forces and implications. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography; 2006; pp. 1-18.
15. Coleman D. The road to low fertility. Ageing Horizons 2007;7:7-15.
16. Lutz W. The future of human reproduction: will birth rates recover or continue to fall? Ageing Horizons 2007;7:15-21.
17. McDonald P. Low fertility and policy. Ageing Horizons 2002;7:22-27.
18. Testa MR. Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography; 2007. pp. 357-379.
19. Berrington A. Perpetual postponers? Women's, men's and couple's fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Popul Trends 2004;117:9-19.
20. Keizer R, Dykstra PA, Jansen MD. Pathways into childlessness: evidence of gendered life course dynamics. J Biosoc Sci 2008;40:863-878.
21. Smallwood S, Jefferies J. Family building intentions in England and Wales: trends, outcomes and interpretations. Popul Trends 2003;112:15-28.
22. Proudfoot S, Wellings K, Glasier A. Analysis why nulliparous women over age 33 wish to use contraception. Contraception 2009;79:98-104.
23. Virtala A, Kunttu K, Huttunen T, Virjo I. Childbearing and the desire to have children among university students in Finland. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:312-316.
24. Goldstein J, Lutz W, Testa MA. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Popul Res Policy Rev 2003;22:479-496.
25. Sobotka T, Testa MR. Childlessness intentions in Europe: a comparison of Belgium (Flanders), Germany, Italy, Poland. In: Höhn D, Avramovand I, Kotowska, editor. People, population change and policies: lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study. Berlin: Springer; 2008. pp. P177-P214.
26. Esping-Andersen G. A new gender contract. In: Esping-Andersen G, Hemerijck A, editor. Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. pp. 68-90.
27. Simpson R. Delayed childbearing and childlessness in Britain. Analyses of the 1958 and 1970 British Cohort Studies. Fertility, living arrangements, care and mobility. Understanding population trends and processes. Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007.
28. Blossfeld H. The new role of women: family formation in modern societies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1995.
29. Philipov D. Fertility intentions and outcomes: the role of policies to close the gap. Eur J Popul 2004;25:355-361.
30. Broekmans FJ, Soules MR, Fauser BC. Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev 2009;30:465-493.
31. Buckles K. Women, finances, and children understanding the returns to delayed childbearing for working women. Am Econ Rev Papers Proc 2008;98:403-407.
32. Frejka T, Sobotka T. Fertility in Europe: diverse, delayed and below replacement. Demogr Res 2008;19:15-45.
33. Blossfeld H-P, Huinink J. Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affect the process of family formation. Am J Sociol 1991;97:143-168.
34. Joffe M. Time trends in biological fertility in Britain. Lancet 2000;355:1961-1965.
35. Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Rowland AS. Reporting errors in time to-pregnancy data collected with a short questionnaire. Impact on power and estimation of fecundability ratios. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133:1282-1290.
36. Zielhuis GA, Hulscher ME, Florack EI. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on fecundability. Int J Epidemiol 1992;21:1151-1156.
37. Joffe M, Key J, Best N, et al. Studying time to pregnancy by use of a retrospective design. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:115-124.
38. Jensen TK, Joffe M, Scheike T, et al. Time trends in waiting time to pregnancy among Danish twins. Hum Reprod 2005;20:955-964.
39. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Declining estimates of infertility in the United States: 1982-2002. Fertil Steril 2006;86:516-523.
40. Scheike TH, Rylander L, Carstensen L, et al. Time trends in human fecundability in Sweden. Epidemiology 2008;19:191-196.
41. Goldstein J, Sobotka T, Jasilioniene A. The end of lowest-low fertility? Popul Dev Rev 2009;35:663-699. In this article the authors provide a demographic analysis of the apparent reversal in lowest-low fertility and explore factors that help explain the observed changes.
42. Myrskylä M, Kohler H-P, Billari FC. Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 2009;460:741-743. The article reported the reversal of fertility decline as a result of continued economic and social development has the potential to slow the rates of population ageing, thereby ameliorating the social and economic problems that have been associated with the emergence and persistence of very low fertility.
43. Dyson T. Population and development: The demographic transition. London, UK: Zed Books Ltd; 2010. p. 72. The chapter on world population and the transition focusses on population trends and characteristics at both the world and world regional levels. The growth of the human population over the past two or three centuries has been a direct consequence of the demographic transition. Moreover, current demographic variation between different parts of the world can only really be understood within the context of the transition. The chapter uses population estimates and projections made by the United Nations.