Aspects of lexical sophistication in advanced learners-oral production

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 269-290

  Bardel, Camilla ^a   Gudmundson, Anna ^a   Lindqvist, Christina ^b  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861087057     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263112000058     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bardel, C., & Lindqvist, C. (2011). Developing a lexical profi ler for spoken French and Italian L2: The role of frequency, cognates and thematic vocabulary. In L. Roberts, G. Pallotti, & C. Bettoni (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 11 (pp. 75-93). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Bartning, I., & Schlyter, S. (2004). Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2 [Acquisitional sequences and developmental stages in L2 French]. Journal of French Language Studies, 14, 1-19.
3. Campione, E., Véronis, J., & Deulofeu, J. (2005). The French corpus. In E. Cresti & M. Moneglia (Eds.), C-ORAL-ROM, Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages (111-133). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Cobb, T., & Horst, M. (2004). Is there room for an academic word list in French? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 15-38). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. Council of Europe. (2001). The common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Daller, H., Van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24, 197-222. (Pubitemid 36561843)
7. De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M., & Voghera, M. (1993). Lessico di frequenza dell'italiano parlato [Frequency lists of spoken Italian]. Milano: Etaslibri.
8. Gougenheim, G. (1959). Le français fondamental 1er degree [Basic French 1st degree]. Ministère de l'Éducation Nationale. Paris: Institut National de Recherche et de Docu-mentation Pédagogiques.
9. Horst, M., & Collins, L. (2006). From faible to strong: How does their vocabulary grow? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 83-106.
10. Hyltenstam, K. (1988). Lexical characteristics of near-native second-language learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 67-84.
11. Laufer, B. (1995). Beyond 2000: A measure of productive lexicon in a second language. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage: Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp. 265-272). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
12. Laufer, B. (1997). What's in a word that makes it hard or easy? Intralexical factors affecting the diffi culty of vocabulary acquisition. In M. McCarthy & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Vocabulary description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 140-155). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307-322.
14. Lindqvist, C. (2010). La richesse lexicale dans la production orale de l'apprenant avancé de français [Lexical richness in the oral production of the advanced learner of French]. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 393-420.
15. Lindqvist, C., Bardel, C., & Gudmundson, A. (2011). Lexical richness in the advanced learner's oral production of French and Italian L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching, 49, 221-240.
16. Milton, J. (2007). Lexical profi les, learning styles and the construct validity of lexical size tests. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocab-ulary knowledge (pp. 47-58). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18. Ovtcharov, V., Cobb, T., & Halter, R. (2006). La richesse lexicale des productions orales: Mesure fi able du niveau de compétence langagière [Lexical richness of oral productions: A reliable measure of profi ciency levels]. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 107-125.
19. Pallaud, B., & Henry, S. (2004). Amorces de mots et répétitions: Des hésitations plus que des erreurs en français parlé [Beginnings of words and repetitions: Hesitations rather than errors in spoken French]. In G. Purnelle, C. Fairon, & A. Dister (Eds.), Le poids des mots: Actes des 7es Journées internationales d'Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles (pp. 848-858). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
20. Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Rule, S., Myles, F., Mitchell, R., David, A., & dos Santos, C. (2010). The development of re-ceptive lexical knowledge of instructed young learners of L2 French. Paper presented at the 20th Eurosla Conference, Reggio Emilia, September 1-4, 2010.
22. Tidball, F., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2008). Analysing lexical richness in French learner language: What frequency lists and teacher judgement can tell us about basic and advanced words. Journal of French Language Studies, 18, 299-313.
23. van Ek, J. A., & Trim, J. L. M. (1991). Threshold level 1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217-234.
25. Vermeer, A. (2004). The relation between lexical richness and vocabulary size in Dutch L1 and L2 children. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 173-189). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
26. Véronis, J. (2000). Fréquence des mots en français parlé. Retrieved June 17, 2011, from http://sites. univ-provence. fr/veronis/data/freq-oral. txt.
27. Willis, M., & Ohashi, Y. (2010). Modelling L2 vocabulary acquisition. Paper presented at the 20th Eurosla Conference, Reggio Emilia, September 1-4, 2010.