Under Construction: The Field of Online Deliberation Research

Journal of Information Technology and Politics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-15

  Coleman, Stephen ^a   Moss, Giles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861000240     PISSN: 19331681     EISSN: 1933169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2011.635957     Document Type: Editorial

References (80)

1. Albrecht, S. 2006. Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(1): 62-82.
2. Aldrich, J. 1993. Rational choice and turnout. American Political Science Review, 37(1): 246-278.
3. Astrom, J. and Gronlund, A. in press. "Online consultations in local government: What works, when and how". In Connecting democracy: Online consultation and the flow of political communication, Edited by: Coleman, S. and Shane, P. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bang, H. P. and Esmark, A. 2009. Good governance in network society: Reconfiguring the political from politics to policy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31(1): 7-37.
5. Barabas, J. 2004. How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review, 98: 687-701.
6. Barnett, C. 2003. Culture and democracy: Media, space and representation, Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
7. Berger, P. and Neuhaus, R. 1977. To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
8. Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2003). Dicing with deception: People with disabilities' strategies for managing safety and identity online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue2/bowker.html.
9. Buckingham-Shum, S. 2006. Sensemaking on the pragmatic web: A hypermedia discourse perspective. September2006. Stuttgart, Germany: Presented at the first International Pragmatic Web Conference.
10. Button, M. and Mattson, K. 1999. Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity, 31(4): 609-637.
11. Chadwick, A. 2009. Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1): 9-42.
12. Coleman, S. 2004. Connecting Parliament to the public via the Internet: Two case studies of online consultations. Information, Communication & Society, 7(1): 1-22.
13. Coleman, S. and Blumler, J. 2009. The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice, and policy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Coleman, S. and Blumler, J. G. 2010. The wisdom of which crowd? On the pathology of a listening government. Political Quarterly, 82(3): 355-364.
15. Coleman, S. and Gotze, J. 2001. Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation, London: Hansard Society.
16. Coleman, S. and Ross, K. 2010. The media and the public: "Them" and "us" in media discourse, Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
17. Conover, P. J. and Searing, D. D. 1994. "Democracy, citizenship, and the study of political socialization". In Developing democracy: Comparative research in honour of J. F. P. Blondel, Edited by: Budge, I. and McKay, D. 24-55. London: Sage.
18. Cruikshank, B. 1999. The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and its critics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Dahlberg, L. 2001. The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4): 615-633.
21. Dahlgren, P. 2005. The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 2(22): 147-162.
22. Davis, R. 1999. The Web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system, New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24. Delborne, J., Anderson, A., Kleinman, D., Mathilde, C. and Powell, M. 2011. Virtual deliberation? Prospects and challenges for integrating the Internet in consensus' conferences. Public Understanding of Science, 20(3): 367-384.
25. Easton, D. and Dennis, J. 1967. The child's acquisition of regime norms: Political efficacy. The American Political Science Review, 61(1): 25-38.
26. Edwards, A. R. 2002. The moderator as an emerging democratic intermediary: The role of the moderator in Internet discussions about public issues. Information Polity, 7(1): 3-20.
27. Elster, J. 1998. "Deliberation and constitution making". In Deliberative democracy, Edited by: Elster, J. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fraser, N. 1990. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26: 56-80.
29. Freeden, M. 2004. Essential contestability and effective contestability. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(1): 3-11.
30. Friedman, B., Khan, P. H. Jr. and Howe, D. C. 2000. Trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43(12): 34-40.
31. Gastil, J. and Black, L. 2008. Public deliberation as the organizing principle of political communication research. Journal of Deliberation, 4(1): 1-47.
32. Gonzales-Bailon, S., Kaltenbrunner, A. and Banchs, R. E. 2010. The structure of political discussion networks: A model for the analysis of online deliberation. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2): 230-243.
33. Graham, T. and Witschge, T. 2003. In search of online deliberation: Towards a new method for examining the quality of online discussions. Communications, 28(2): 173-204.
34. Habermas, J. 1989. The theory of communicative action, Boston: Beacon Press.
35. Habermas, J. 1991. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Hall, S. 1980. "Encoding/decoding". In Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79, Edited by: Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A. and Willis, P. 128-139. Abingdon, England: Hutchinson.
37. Hay, C. 2006. "Political ontology". In The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis, Edited by: Goodin, R. and Tilly, C. 78-97. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Hill, K. A. and Hughes, J. E. 1998. Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
39. Hoffmann, M. H. G. 2008. "Requirements for reflective argument visualization tools: A case for using validity as a normative standard". In Computational models of argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, Edited by: Besnard, P., Doutre, S. and Hunter, A. 196-203. Amsterdam: IOS.
40. IMPACT Project. (2011). Project summary: Integrated method for policy making using argument modelling and computer assisted text analysis (European Framework 7 project: Grant Agreement No 247228). http://www.policy-impact.eu/project-summary.
41. Ivison, D. 1997. The self at liberty: Political argument and the arts of government, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42. Janssen, D. and Kies, R. 2005. Online forums and political deliberation. Acta Politica, 40(3): 313-317.
43. Kim, J. Y. 2006. The impact of internet use pattern on political engagement: A focus on on-line deliberation and virtual social capital. Information Polity, 11(1): 35-49.
44. Law, J. and Urry, J. 2004. Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3): 390-410.
45. Loveland, M. and Popescu, D. 2011. Democracy on the Web. Information, Communication & Society, 14(5): 684-703.
46. Luskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. and Iyengar, S. 2003. Considered opinions on U.S. foreign policy: Face-to-face versus online deliberative polling. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. August2003, Philadelphia, PA.
47. Macintosh, A., Coleman, S. and Schneeberger, A. 2009. e-Participation: The research gaps. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5694: 1-11.
48. Macintosh, A., Robson, A., Smith, E. and Whyte, A. 2003. Electronic democracy and young people. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2): 43-54.
49. Markham, T. and Couldry, N. 2007. Tracking the reflexivity of the (dis)engaged citizen. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5): 675-695.
50. Min, S. 2007. Online vs. face-to-face deliberation: Effects on civic engagement. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication, 12(4): 1369-1387.
51. Min, S. J. 2009. Deliberation, East meets West: Exploring the cultural dimension of citizen deliberation, Columbus, OH: Unpublished PhD thesis, The Graduate School of The Ohio State University.
52. Mol, A. 1998. Ontological politics: A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 46(2): 74-89.
53. Monnoyer-Smith, L. 2006. Citizen's deliberation on the Internet: An exploratory study. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(3): 58-74.
54. Mouffe, C. 2000. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?. Social Research, 66(3): 745-758.
55. Mueller, D. 2003. Public choice III, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
56. Muhlberger, P. 2000. Defining and measuring deliberative participation and potential: A theoretical analysis and operationalization. Paper presented at the International Society of Political Psychology Twenty-Third Annual Scientific Meeting. July2000, Seattle, WA.
57. Muhlberger, P., & Weber, L. (2006). Lessons from the Virtual Agora Project: The effects of agency, identity, information and deliberation on political knowledge, by Peter Muhlberger and Lori M. Weber. Journal of Deliberation, 2(1). http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol2/iss1/art13.
58. Neblo, M. 2005. Thinking through democracy: Between the theory and practice of deliberative politics. Acta Politica, 40: 169-181.
59. Olson, K. 2008. Constructing citizens. The Journal of Politics, 70(1): 40-53.
60. Osborne, T. and Rose, N. 1999. Do the social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research. British Journal of Sociology, 50(3): 367-396.
61. Parkinson, J. 2003. Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(1): 180-196.
62. Polat, R. and Pratchett, L. 2009. "E-citizenship: Reconstructing the public online". In Changing local governance, changing citizens, Edited by: Durose, C. and Richardson, L. 193-210. Bristol, England: The Policy Press.
63. Price, V. and Cappella, J. N. 2002. Online deliberation and its influence: The electronic dialogue project in campaign 2000. IT & Society, 1(1): 303-329.
64. Pykett, J., Saward, M. and Schaefer, A. 2010. Framing the good citizen. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 12(4): 523-538.
65. Renton, A. and Macintosh, A. 2007. Computer supported argument maps as a policy memory. The Information Society, 23(2): 125-133.
66. Ryfe, D. 2007. Toward a sociology of deliberation. Journal of Deliberation, 3(1): 1-27.
67. Sanders, L. M. 1997. Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3): 347-376.
68. Saward, M. 2003. Enacting democracy. Political Studies, 51(1): 161-179.
69. Schudson, M. 2000. Good citizens and bad history: Today's political ideals in historical perspective. The Communication Review, 4(1): 1-20.
70. Schumpeter, J. A. 1976. Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 5th, London: Allen & Unwin.
71. Shah, D., McLeod, J. and Lee, N. 2009. Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: Processes of socialization into citizenship. Political Communication, 26(1): 102-117.
72. Shane, P. 2004. Democracy online: The prospects for political renewal through the Internet, New York: Routledge.
73. Smith, G., John, P., Sturgis, P. and Nomura, H. 2009. Deliberation and internet engagement: initial findings from a randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of facilitated internet forums. Paper presented at the European Consortium of Political Research General Conference. June2009, Potsdam, Germany.
74. Torney-Purta, J. 2000. Comparative perspectives on political socialization and civic education. Comparative Education Review, 44(1): 88-95.
75. Wilhelm, A. G. 2000. Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace, New York: Routledge.
76. Woolgar, S. 1991. "Configuring the user: The case of usability trials". In A sociology of monsters essays on power technology and domination, Edited by: Law, J. 57-102. London: Routledge.
77. Wright, S. 2009. "The role of the moderator: Problems and possibilities for government-run online discussion forums". In Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice, Edited by: Davies, T. and Gangadharan, S. P. 233-242. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
78. Wright, S. and Street, J. 2007. Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums. New Media & Society, 9(5): 849-869.
79. Young, I. M. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5): 670-690.
80. Young, I. M. 2002. Inclusion and democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.