More discussions for granger causality and new causality measures

Cognitive Neurodynamics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 33-42

  Hu, Sanqing ^a   Cao, Yu ^b   Zhang, Jianhai ^a   Kong, Wanzeng ^a   Yang, Kun ^a   Zhang, Yanbin ^a   Li, Xun ^a  

^a HANGZHOU DIANZI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Graduate School of Computational Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Granger causality; Linear regression model; New causality; Prediction

Indexed keywords

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NEUROSCIENCE; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 84860840164     PISSN: 18714080     EISSN: 18714099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-011-9175-8     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Atmanspacher H, Rotter S (2008) Interpreting neurodynamics: concepts and facts. Cogn Neurodyn 2:297-318
2. Baccal LA, Sameshima K (2001) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 84 (6): 463-474 (Pubitemid 33605196)
3. Bressler SL, Anil KS (2010) Wiener-Granger causality: a well established methodology. NeuroImage (in press)
4. Cadotte AJ, Mareci TH, DeMarse TB et al (2009) Temporal lobe epilepsy: anatomical and effective connectivity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 17 (3):214-223
5. Ding M, Chen Y, Bressler SL Granger causality: basic theory and applications to neuroscience. In: Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Timmer J (eds) Handbook of time series analysis. pp 437-460 Wiley, Weinheim, (2006)
6. Freiwald WA, Valdes P, Bosch J et al (1999) Testing non-linearity and directedness of interactions between neural groups in the macaque inferotemporal cortex. J Neurosci Methods 94 (1): 105-119
7. Geweke J (1982) Measurement of linear-dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc 77 (378):304-313
8. Geweke J (1984) Measures of conditional linear dependence andfeedback between time series. J Am Stat Assoc 79 (388):907-915
9. Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37 (4):424-438
10. Gow DW, Segawa JA, Alfhors S et al (2008) Lexical influences on speech perception: a Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates. Neuroimage 43 (3):614-623
11. Gow DW, Keller CJ, Eskandar E et al (2009) Parallel versus serial processing dependencies in the perisylvian speech network: a Granger analysis of intracranial EEG data. Brain Lang 110 (1):43-48
12. Hesse W, Oller M, Arnold M et al (2003) The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J Neurosci Methods 124 (1):27-44 (Pubitemid 36315806)
13. Hu S, Dai G, Worrell GA et al (2011) Causality analysis of neural connectivity: critical examination of existing methods and advances of new methods. IEEE Trans on Neural Netw 22 (6):829-844
14. Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo-Filho W et al (2001) Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybern 85:145-157 (Pubitemid 33605209)
15. Oya H, Poon PWF, Brugge JF et al (2007) Functional connectionsbetween auditory cortical fields in humans revealed by Granger causality analysis of intra-cranial evoked potentials to sounds:comparison of two methods. Biosystems 89:198-207 (Pubitemid 46679120)
16. Rajagovindan R, Ding M (2008) Decomposing neural synchrony:toward an explanation for near-zero phase-lag in cortical oscillatory networks. Plos one 3 (11):e3649
17. Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R (2005) Mapping directedinfluence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 25 (1):230-242 (Pubitemid 40289151)
18. Seth AK (2008) Causal networks in simulated neural systems. Cogn Neurodyn 2:49-64 (Pubitemid 351191296)
19. Wiener N The theory of prediction. In: Beckenbach EF (eds) Modern mathematics for engineers, Chap. 8.. McGraw-Hill, New York (1956)
20. Wang X, Chen Y, Ding M (2008) Estimating Granger causality after stimulus onset: a cautionary note. Neuroimage 41 (3):767-776
21. Wang X, Chen Y, Bressler SL et al (2007) Granger causality between multiple interdependent neurobiological time series: blockwise versus pairwise methods. Int J Neural Syst 17 (2):71-78 (Pubitemid 46906232)
22. Zhang L, Zhong G, Wu Y et al (2010) Using granger-geweke causality model to evaluate the effective connectivity of primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area and cerebellum. J Biomed Sci Eng 3:848-860
23. Yamashita O, Sadato N, Okada T et al (2005) Evaluating frequencywise directed connectivity of BOLD signals applying relative power contribution with the linear multivariate time-series models. Neuroimage 25 (2):478-490 (Pubitemid 40387330)