User performance in complex bi-manual haptic manipulation with 3 DOFs vs. 6 DOFs

Haptics Symposium 2012, HAPTICS 2012 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 315-322

  Weller, Rene ^a   Zachmann, Gabriel ^a  

^a CLAUSTHAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORCE FEEDBACK DEVICES; HAPTIC INTERACTIONS; HIGH FIDELITY; MULTI-USER INTERACTION; MULTIPLAYER GAMES; POLYGON COUNT; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; RIGID OBJECTS; TELE-OPERATIONS; USER PERCEPTIONS; USER PERFORMANCE; USER STUDY; VIRTUAL ASSEMBLY SIMULATIONS;

INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 84860827284     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HAPTIC.2012.6183808     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. F. T. Attar, R. V. Patel, and M. Moallem. Hived: A passive system for haptic interaction and visualization of elastic deformations. World Haptics Conference, 0:529-530, 2005.
2. C. Basdogan, C.-H. Ho, M. A. Srinivasan, and M. Slater. An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 7:443-460, December 2000.
3. D. F. Keefe, R. C. Zeleznik, and D. H. Laidlaw. Drawing on air: Input techniques for controlled 3D line illustration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(5):1067-1081, 2007.
4. W. R. Garner. The Processing of Information and Structure. Potomac, 1974.
5. M. Hutchins, D. Stevenson, M. Adcock, and P. Youngblood. Using collaborative haptics in remote surgical training. In in Proc.First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems(WHCŠ05, pages 481-482. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
6. R. J. K. Jacob, L. E. Sibert, D. C. McFarlane, and M. P. Mullen, Jr. Integrality and separability of input devices. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 1:3-26, March 1994.
7. Y. Jung, S.-C. Yeh, and J. Stewart. Tailoring virtual reality technology for stroke rehabilitation: a human factors design. In CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '06, pages 929-934, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
8. A. Leganchuk, S. Zhai, andW. Buxton. Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input: an experimental study. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 5:326-359, December 1998.
9. T.-Y. Li and J.-S. Chen. Incremental 3d collision detection with hierarchical data structures. In VRST '98: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, pages 139-144, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM.
10. A. C. M. Veit and D. Bechmann. Influence of degrees of freedom's manipulation on performances during orientation tasks in virtual reality environments. In VRST 2009: The 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality and Software Technology, Kyoto (Japan), November 2009.
11. A. Martinet, G. Casiez, and L. Grisoni. The effect of dof separation in 3d manipulation tasks with multi-touch displays. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST '10, pages 111-118, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
12. J. Murayama, L. Bougrila, Y. K. Akahane, S. Hasegawa, B. Hirsbrunner, and M. Sato. Spidar g&g: A two-handed haptic interface for bimanual vr interaction. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics 2004, pages 138-146, 2004.
13. N. Stylopoulos and D. Rattner. Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin North Am, 83(6):1321-1337, December 2003. (Pubitemid 37547961)
14. D. Swapp, V. Pawar, and C. Loscos. Interaction with co-located haptic feedback in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 10:24-30, 2006. 10.1007/s10055-006-0027-5. (Pubitemid 43750701)
15. D. Tsetserukou. Haptihug: A novel haptic display for communication of hug over a distance. In EuroHaptics (1), pages 340-347, 2010.
16. M. Veit, A. Capobianco, and D. Bechmann. Consequence of two-handed manipulation on speed, precision and perception on spatial input task in 3d modelling applications. Journal of Universal Computer Science (j-jucs), Special Issue on Human-Computer Interaction, 14(19):3174-3187, 2008.
17. L. N. Verner and A. M. Okamura. Force & torque feedback vs force only feedback. In WHC '09: Proceedings of the World Haptics 2009-Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pages 406-410, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
18. S.Wang and M. A. Srinivasan. The role of torque in haptic perception of object location in virtual environments. In HAPTICS '03: Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS'03), page 302, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
19. R. Weller and G. Zachmann. Kinetic separation lists for continuous collision detection of deformable objects. In Third Workshop in Virtual Reality Interactions and Physical Simulation (Vriphys), Madrid, Spain, 6-7 November 2006.
20. R.Weller and G. Zachmann. Inner sphere trees for proximity and penetration queries. In 2009 Robotics: Science and Systems Conference (RSS), Seattle, WA, USA, June/July 2009.
21. R. Weller and G. Zachmann. A unified approach for physically-based simulations and haptic rendering. In Sandbox 2009: ACM SIGGRAPH Video Game Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, USA, Aug. 2009. ACM Press.
22. R. Weller and G. Zachmann. 3-dof vs. 6-dof - playful evaluation of complex haptic interactions. In IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), 2011 Digest of Technical Papers. IEEE Computer Society, Jan. 2011.