A comparative analysis of bench-top performance assessment of distal protection filters in transient flow conditions

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 249-260

  Siewiorek, Gail M ^a   Wholey, Mark H ^b   Finol, Ender A ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c The University of Texas at San Antonio   (United States)

Author keywords

Distal protection; Embolic protection filter; Flow model; In vitro experiment; Internal carotid artery; Pulsatile flow; Stent; Vascular impedance

Indexed keywords

MICROSPHERE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BLOOD FILTRATION; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD SAMPLING; BODY TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTAL PROTECTION FILTER; FILTER; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLOW RATE; HEATING; IN VITRO STUDY; INJECTION; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; PARTICLE SIZE; PHANTOM; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 84860719490     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: 15451550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/11-3720.1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Tan WA, Bates MC, Wholey MH. Cerebral protection systems for distal emboli during carotid artery interventions. J Interv Cardiol. 2001;14:465-474. (Pubitemid 32846465)
2. Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49:126-170. (Pubitemid 46061419)
3. Barbato JE, Dillavou E, Horowitz MB, et al. A randomized trial of carotid artery stenting with and without cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:760-765.
4. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:11-23.
5. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarak N, Wholey MH. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;60:259-266. (Pubitemid 37204008)
6. Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, et al. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke. 2003;34:813-819. (Pubitemid 36307419)
7. Charalambous N, Jahnke T, Bolte H, et al. Reduction of cerebral embolization in carotid angioplasty: an in-vitro experiment comparing 2 cerebral protection devices. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:161-167.
8. Müller-Hülsbeck S, Grimm J, Liess C, et al. Comparison and modification of two cerebral protection devices used for carotid angioplasty: in vitro experiment. Radiology. 2002;225: 289-294.
9. Müller-Hülsbeck S, Husler EJ, Schaffner SR, et al. An in vitro analysis of a carotid artery stent with a protective membrane. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1295-1305. (Pubitemid 39487861)
10. Müller-Hülsbeck S, Jahnke T, Liess C, et al. Comparison of various cerebral protection devices used for carotid artery stent placement: an in vitro experiment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:613-620. (Pubitemid 36618028)
11. Müller-Hülsbeck S, Jahnke T, Liess C, et al. In vitro comparison of four cerebral protection filters for preventing human plaque embolization during carotid interventions. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:793-802. (Pubitemid 36228024)
12. Ohki T, Roubin GS, Veith FJ, et al. Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: an ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:1034-1044.
13. Casserly IP, Abou-Chebl A, Fathi RB, et al. Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1466-1472. (Pubitemid 41446180)
14. Hendriks JM, Zindler JD, van der Lugt A, et al. Embolic protection filters for carotid stenting: differences in flow obstruction depending on filter construction. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:47-50. (Pubitemid 43271482)
15. Roffi M, Greutmann M, Schwarz U, et al. Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:103-109. (Pubitemid 351252238)
16. Finol EA, Siewiorek GM, Scotti CM, et al. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:177-186.
17. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MH, Finol EA. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:712-724. (Pubitemid 47598199)
18. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MH, Finol EA. Vascular resistance in the carotid artery: an in vitro investigation of embolic protection filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:1467-1476.
19. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MH, Finol EA. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection filters: pulsatile flow conditions. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:735-743.
20. Holdsworth DW, Norley CJ, Frayne R, et al. Characterization of common carotid artery blood-flow waveforms in normal human subjects. Physiol Meas. 1999;20:219-240. (Pubitemid 29399835)
21. Weinberg CE, Hertzberg JR, Ivy DD, et al. Extraction of pulmonary vascular compliance, pulmonary vascular resistance, and right ventricular work from single-pressure and Doppler flow measurements in children with pulmonary hypertension: a new method for evaluating reactivity: in vitro and clinical studies. Circulation. 2004;110:2609-2617. (Pubitemid 39453010)
22. Castellani L, Causin F, Danieli D, et al. Carotid stenting with filter protection. Correlation of ACT values with angiographic and histopathologic findings. J Neuroradiol. 2003;30:103-108. (Pubitemid 36383487)
23. Zhu YS, Tseng BY, Shibata S, et al. Increases in cerebrovascular impedance in older adults. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:376-381.
24. Siewiorek GM, Eskandari MK, Finol EA. The Angioguard embolic protection device. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5:287-296.
25. Order BM, Glass C, Liess C, et al. Comparison of 4 cerebral protection filters for carotid angioplasty: an in vitro experiment focusing on carotid anatomy. J Endovasc Ther. 2004; 11:211-218. (Pubitemid 38481076)
26. Shah AR, Lipsitz EC, Scher L, et al. The effect of tortuosity on five different cerebral protection devices in an ex-vivo model. Presented at the Eastern Vascular Society; September 24-26, 2009; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
27. Quan VH, Huynh R, Seifert PA, et al. Morphometric analysis of particulate debris extracted by four different embolic protection devices from coronary arteries, aortocoronary saphenous vein conduits, and carotid arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1415-1419. (Pubitemid 40824759)
28. Siewiorek GM, Krafty RT, Wholey MH, et al. The association of clinical variables and filter design with carotid artery stenting thirty-day outcome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42: 282-291.
29. Gray WA. The Gore EMBOLDEN clinical study. Presented at Vascular Interventional Advances (VIVA); October 19-22, 2010; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
30. White CJ, Iyer SS, Hopkins LN, et al. Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:503-512.
31. Hopkins LN, Myla S, Grube E, et al. Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the FilterWire EX/EZ: 1-year results in the CABERNET trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;7:950-960. (Pubitemid 351951320)
32. Chaturvedi S, Gray WA, Matsumura J. Safety outcomes from the PROTECT Carotid Artery Stenting Multicenter Study. Presented at the International Stroke Conference; February 17-20, 2009; San Diego, California, USA.
33. Katzen BT, Criado FJ, Ramee SR, et al. Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007; 70:316-323. (Pubitemid 47206049)
34. Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44: 258-268. (Pubitemid 44142925)
35. Fairman R, Gray WA, Scicli AP, et al. The CAPTURE registry: analysis of strokes resulting from carotid artery stenting in the post approval setting: timing, location, severity, and type. Ann Surg. 2007;246:551-558.
36. Gray WA, Chaturvedi S, Verta P, et al. Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:159-166.
37. Safian RD, Bresnahan JF, Jaff MR, et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2384-2389. (Pubitemid 43866375)