Vascular Resistance in the Carotid Artery: An In Vitro Investigation of Embolic Protection Filters

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1467-1476

  Siewiorek, Gail M ^a   Wholey, Mark H ^c   Finol, Ender A ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ARTICLE; BLOOD FILTER; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; PHANTOM; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CAROTID ARTERIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMBOLISM; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; ULTRAFILTRATION; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 52149117617     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. NASCET Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325 (1991) 445-453
2. CAVATAS Investigators. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 357 (2001) 1729-1737
3. Wholey M.H., Al-Mubarek N., and Wholey M.H. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 60 (2003) 259-266
4. Eskandari M.K. Design and development of mechanical embolic protection devices. Expert Rev Med Devices 3 (2006) 387-393
5. Smith R.F., Rutt B.K., Fox A.J., Rankin R.N., and Holdsworth D.W. Geometric characterization of stenosed human carotid arteries. Acad Radiol 3 (1996) 898-911
6. Holdsworth D.W., Norley C.J., Frayne R., Steinman D.A., and Rutt B.K. Characterization of common carotid artery blood-flow waveforms in normal human subjects. Physiol Meas 20 (1999) 219-240
7. Kasirajan K., Schneider P.A., and Kent K.C. Filter devices for cerebral protection during carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Endovasc Ther 10 (2003) 1039-1045
8. Siewiorek G.M., Wholey M.H., and Finol E.A. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther 14 (2007) 712-724
9. Nichols W.W., and O'Rourke M.F. Vascular impedance. McDonald's blood flow in arteries: theoretic, experimental and clinical principles. 3rd ed. (1990), Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 283-324
10. Müller-Hülsbeck S., Jahnke T., Liess C., Glass C., Grimm J., and Heller M. Comparison of various cerebral protection devices used for carotid artery stent placement: An in vitro experiment. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 (2003) 613-620
11. Müller-Hülsbeck S., Jahnke T., Liess C., et al. In vitro comparison of four cerebral protection filters for preventing human plaque embolization during carotid interventions. J Endovasc Ther 9 (2002) 793-802
12. Order B.M., Glass C., Liess C., Heller M., and Müller-Hülsbeck S. Comparison of 4 cerebral protection filters for carotid angioplasty: an in vitro experiment focusing on carotid anatomy. J Endovasc Ther 11 (2004) 211-218
13. Ohki T., Roubin G.S., Veith F.J., Iyer S.S., and Brady E. Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: an ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Surg 30 (1999) 1034-1044
14. Finol E.A., Scotti C.M., Verdinelli I., Amon C.H., and Wholey M.H. Performance assessment of embolic protection filters for carotid artery stenting. Model Med Biol 8 (2005) 133-142
15. Finol E.A., Siewiorek G.M., Scotti C.M., Wholey M.H., and Wholey M.H. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther 15 (2008) 177-186
16. Gaspard S., Siewiorek G.M., and Finol E.A. Performance assessment of a cerebral protection device by in vitro testing and computational fluid dynamics (2006) Presented at the ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference; June 21-25, Amelia Island, Florida
17. Hendriks J.M., Zindler J.D., van der Lugt A., et al. Embolic protection filters for carotid stenting: differences in flow obstruction depending on filter construction. J Endovasc Ther 13 (2006) 47-50
18. Casserly I.P., Abou-Chebl A., Fathi R.B., et al. Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 1466-1472
19. Crawley F., Clifton A., Buckenham T., Loosemore T., Taylor R.S., and Brown M.M. Comparison of hemodynamic cerebral ischemia and microembolic signals detected during carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty. Stroke 28 (1997) 2460-2464
20. Hayashi K., Kitagawa N., and Morikawa M. Observing the carotid debris aspirated during carotid stenting: technical note. Neurol Res 27 (2005) 22-26
21. Quan V.H., Huynh R., Seifert P.A., et al. Morphometric analysis of particulate debris extracted by four different embolic protection devices from coronary arteries, aortocoronary saphenous vein conduits, and carotid arteries. Am J Cardiol 95 (2005) 1415-1419
22. Chen C.I., Iguchi Y., Garami Z., et al. Analysis of emboli during carotid stenting with distal protection device. Cerebrovasc Dis 21 (2006) 223-228
23. de Weert T.T., Ouhlous M., Zondervan P.E., et al. In vitro characterization of atherosclerotic carotid plaque with multidetector computed tomography and histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 15 (2005) 1906-1914
24. Golledge J., Greenhalgh R.M., and Davies A.H. The symptomatic carotid plaque. Stroke 31 (2000) 774-781
25. Rapp J.H., Pan X.M., Yu B., et al. Cerebral ischemia and infarction from atheroemboli <100 μm in size. Stroke 34 (2003) 1976-1980