The Angioguard™ embolic protection device

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 287-296

  Siewiorek, Gail M ^a   Eskandari, Mark K ^b   Finol, Ender A ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral protection; Design of medical devices; Embolic protection device; Flow modeling; Pressure gradient; Stenosis; Stenting

Indexed keywords

ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; BALLOON OCCLUSION; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISTAL FILTER DEVICE; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE; EX VIVO STUDY; FLOW RATE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PARTICLE SIZE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; POROSITY; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; PROXIMAL BALLOON OCCLUSION; STENT; CAROTID ARTERY; ECONOMICS; EMBOLISM; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW;

CAROTID ARTERIES; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; EMBOLISM; HUMANS; POROSITY; PROTECTIVE DEVICES;

EID: 48649085319     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.5.3.287     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 113(6), e85-e151 (2006).
2. Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE Jr et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force-on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49(1), 126-170 (2007).
3. McCormick DJ, Vlad T, Fasseas P. Carotid artery stenting will replace carotid enclarterectomy. Perspect. Vasc. Surg. Endovasc. Ther. 19(3), 223-227 (2007).
4. Patel S, Hermiller J. Embolic protection: the FilterWire EZ™ Embolic Protection System. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 5(1), 19-24 (2008).
5. Collaborators NASCET. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl. J. Med. 325(7), 445-453 (1991).
6. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 60(2), 259-266 (2003).
7. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 351(5), 1493-1501 (2004).
8. Eskandari MK. Design and development of mechanical embolic protection devices. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 3(3), 387-393 (2006).
9. Kasirajan K, Schneider PA, Kent KC. Filter devices for cerebral protection during carotid angioplasty and stenting. J. Endovasc. Ther. 10(6), 1039-1045 (2003).
10. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Grimm J, Liess C, Hedderich J, Bergmeyer M, Heiler M. Comparison and modification of two cerebral protection devices used for carotid angioplasty: in vitro experiment. Radiology 225(1), 289-294 (2002).
11. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Husler EJ, Schaffner S R et al. An in vitro analysis of a carotid artery stent with a protective porous membrane. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 15(11), 1295-1305 (2004).
12. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Jahnke T, Liess C Glass C, Grimm J, Heller M. Comparison of various cerebral protection devices used for carotid artery stent placement: an in vitro experiment. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 14(5), 613-620 (2003).
13. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Jahnke T, Liess C et al. In vitro comparison of four cerebral protection filters for preventing human plaque embolization during carotid interventions. J Endovasc. Ther. 9(6), 793-802 (2002).
14. Order BM, Glass C, Liess C, Heller M, Muller-Hulsbeck S. Comparison of 4 cerebral protection filters for carotid angioplasty: an in vitro experiment focusing on carotid anatomy. J. Endovasc. Ther. 11(2), 211-218 (2004).
15. Hendriks JM, Zindler JD, van der Lugt A et al. Embolic protection filters for carotid stenting: differences in now obstruction depending on filter construction. J Endovasc. Ther. 13(1), 47-50 (2006).
16. Finol EA, Scotti CM, Verdinelli I, Amon CH, Wholey MH. Performance assessment ofembolic protection filters for carotid artery stenting. Model, Med. Biol. VI. 8, 133-142 (2005).
17. Finol EA, Siewiorek GM, Scotti CM, Wholey MH, Wholey MH. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison ofdistal protection filters. J. Endovasc. Ther. 15(2), 177-186 (2008).
18. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MP, Finol EA. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J. Endovasc. Ther. 14(5), 712-724 (2007).
19. Casserly IP, Abou-Chebl A, Fathi RB et al. Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection deyices: predictors and clinical outcome. J. Am. Coll. Cardial., 46(8), 1466-1472(2005).
20. Roffi M, Greutmann M, Schwarz U, Luscher TF, Eberli FR, Amann-Vesti B. Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design. J. Endovasc. Ther. 15(1), 103-109 (2008).
21. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Stolzmann P, Liess C et al. Vessel wall damage caused by cerebral protection devices: ex vivo evaluation in porcine carotid arteries. Radiology 235(2), 454-460 (2005).
22. Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J. Vasc. Surg. 44(2), 258-268 (2006).
23. White CJ, Iyer SS, Hopkins LN, Katzen BT, Russell M E. Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 67(4), 103-512 (2006).
24. Hopkins LN. CABERNET; 30-day trial results from the use of a novel carotid stent and embolic protection system. Presented at: Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT). Washington, DC. USA, 27 September- 1 October 2004.
25. Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC, Hannegan C, Selby B. Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino) 47(2), 137-141 (2006).
26. Safian RD, Bresnahan JF. Jaff MR et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. J. Am. Coll Cardiol. 47(12), 2384-2389 (2006).
27. Whitlow PL. SECuRITY update. Presented at: Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT). Washington, DC, USA, 27 September- 1 October 2004.
28. Cosottini M, Michelassi MC, Puglioli M et al. Silent cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients treated with protected and unprotected carotid artery stenting. Stroke 36(11), 2389-2393 (2005).
29. Pinero P, Gonzalez A, Mayol A et al. Silent ischemia after neuroprotected percutaneous carotid stenting: a diffasion-weighted, MRI study. AJNR 27(6), 1338-1345 (2006).
30. Masuda J, Yutani C, Ogata J, Kuriyama Y, Yamaguchi T. Atheromatous embolism in the brain: a clinicopathologic analysis of 15 autopsy cases. Neurology 44(7), 1231-1237 (1994).
31. Rapp J H, Pan XM, Sharp FR et al. Atheroemboli to the brain: size threshold for causing acute nettronal cell death. J Vasc. Surg. 32(1), 68-76 (2000).
32. Rapp JH, Pan XM, Yu B et al. Cerebral ischemia and infarction from atheroemboli <100 microm in size. Stroke 34(8), 1976-1980 (2003).
33. Hauth EA, Jansen C, Drescher R et al. MR and clinical follow-up of diffusion-weighted cerebral lesions after carotid artery stenting. AJNR 26(9), 2336-2341 (2005).
34. Rapp JH, Wakil L, Sawliney R et al. Subclinical embolization after carotid artery stenting: new lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging occur postprocedure. J. Vasc. Surg. 45(5), 867-872 (2007).
35. Tedesco MM, Lee JT, Dalman RL et al. Postprocedural microembolic events following carotid surgery and carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc. Surg. 46(2), 244-250 (2007).
36. Bendszus M, Stoll G. Silent cerebral ischaemia: hidden fingerprints of invasive medical procedures. Lancet Neurol. 5(4), 364-372 (2006).
37. Grunwald IQ, Supprian T, Politi M et al. Cognitive changes after carotid artery stenting. Neuroradiology 48(5), 319-323 (2006).
38. Purandare N, Burns A, Daly KJ et al. Cerebral emboli as a potential cause of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia: case-control study. BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.) 332(7550), 1119-1124 (2006).
39. Cieri E, De Rango P, Maccaroni MR, Spaccatini A, Caso V, Cao P. Is haemodynamic depression during carotid stenting a predictor of peri-procedural complications? Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 35(4), 399-404 (2008).
40. Arrebola-Lopez M, Hernandez-Osma E, Gomez-Moya B et al. Carotid stenosis in high risk patients. The SAPPHIRE study versus a decision analysis. Which is the best therapeutic option?. Rev. Neurol. 40(8), 449-452 (2005).
41. Kilaru S, Korn P, Kasirajan K et al. Is carotid angioplasty and stenting more cost effective than carotid endarterectomy? J. Vasc. Surg. 37(2), 331-339 (2003).
42. Park B, Mavanur A, Dahn M, Menzoian J. Clinical outcomes and cost comparison of carotid artery angioplasty with stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. J. Vasc. Surg. 44(2), 270-276 (2006).
43. Pawaskar M, Satiani B, Balkrishnan R, Starr JE. Economic evaluation of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 205(3), 413-419 (2007).