Summative assessment by teachers

International Encyclopedia of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 384-391

  Daugherty, R ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Coursework; Criteria; Evaluation; Moderation; Performance assessment; Portfolio; Quality assurance; Quality control; Reliability; Standards; Summative; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860668896     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00363-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. The Role of Teachers in the Assessment of Learning 2006, Assessment Reform Group, University Institute of Education, London.
2. Black P., Wiliam D. Large-scale assessment systems: Design principles drawn from international comparisons. Measurement 2007, 5(1):1-53.
3. Broadfoot P. Performance assessment in perspective: International trends and current English experience. Evaluating Authentic Assessment 1995, 9-43. Open University Press, Buckingham. H. Torrance (Ed.).
4. Crooks T., Kane M., Cohen A. Threats to the valid use of assessments. Assessment in Education 1996, 3(3):265-285.
5. Cumming J., Maxwell G. Assessment in Australian schools: Current practice and trends. Assessment in Education 2004, 11(1):89-108.
6. Daugherty R. National curriculum assessment in Wales: Adaptations and divergence. Educational Research 2009, 51(2):247-250.
7. Gilmore A. Large-scale assessment and teachers' assessment capacity: Learning opportunities for teachers in the national education monitoring project in New Zealand. Assessment in Education 2002, 9(3):343-361.
8. Harlen W. A systematic review of the reliability and validity of assessment by teachers used for summative purposes. Research Evidence in Education, Issue 1 2004, Institute of Education EPPI Centre, London.
9. Harlen W. Assessment of Learning 2007, Sage, London.
10. Hutchinson C., Hayward L. The journey so far: Assessment for learning in Scotland. Curriculum Journal 2005, 16(2):225-248.
11. Koretz D. Large-scale portfolio assessments in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education 1998, 5(3):309-334.
12. Madaus G., Kellaghan T. The British experience of 'authentic' testing. Phi Delta Kappan 1993, 74:458-469.
13. Resnick L., Resnick D. Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction 1992, 39-75. Kluwer, Boston, MA. B.R. Gifford, M.C. O'Connor (Eds.).
14. Sadler R. Indeterminacy in the use of pre-set criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2009, 34(2):159-179.
15. Shepard L. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher 2000, 29(7):4-14.
16. Tsuneyoshi R. The new Japanese educational reforms and the achievement 'crisis' debate. Educational Policy 2004, 18(2):364-394.
17. Whetton C. A brief history of a testing time: National curriculum assessment in England 1989-2008. Educational Research 2009, 51(2):137-159.
18. Wilmut J. Experience of Summative Teacher Assessment in the UK: A Review 2004, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London.