The Role of the Planning Scholar: Research, Conflict, and Social Change

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 147-159

  Siemiatycki, Matti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

planning education; practice engagement; research ethics; research methods; role of the planner

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860667818     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X12440729     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Albrecht L.Changing roles and positions of planners.Urban Studies. 1991;28:123-37.
2. Baum H. S.Planners and public expectations. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman; 1983:.
3. Baum H. S.Fantasies and realities in university-community partnerships.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;20:234-46.
4. Beard V.Covert planning for social transformation in Indonesia.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2002;22:15-25.
5. Beard V.,Basolo V.Commentary: Moving beyond crisis, crossroads, and the abyss in the disciplinary formation of planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2009;29:233-42.
6. Breheny M. J.Chalkface to coalface: A review of the academic-practice interface.Environment and Planning B. 1989;16:451-68.
7. Calhoun C.Engaging contradictions: Theory, politics and method of activist scholarship. Hale C. R., ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2008:.
8. Canadian Institute of Planners. 2004. Code of practice. http://www.cip-icu.ca/web/la/en/pa/c59dde35f1184b5e89385e53506c19f8/template.asp.
9. Chatterton P.Demand the possible: Journeys in changing our world as a public activist-scholar.Antipode. 2008;40:421-28.
10. Checkoway B.Professionally related public service as applied scholarship: Guidelines for the evaluation of planning faculty.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1998;17 (4): 358-60.
11. ConwayJ.2004. On scholar activism. Africa-The next liberation struggle conference. York University, Toronto, September9. http://www.arts.yorku.ca/african_liberation/conference_papers/Conway_print.html.
12. Dalton L. C.Weaving the fabric of planning education.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2001;20:423-36.
13. Dalton L. C.Emerging knowledge about planning practice.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1989;9 (1): 29-44.
14. Davidoff P.Advocacy planning and pluralism.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1965;31 (4): 331-38.
15. DelacourtS.Campion-SmithB.2011. Tories accused of digging up dirt on "Liberal" profs. Toronto Star, February11. www.thestar.ca (accessed June 10, 2011).
16. Dorling D.,Shaw M.Geographies of the agenda: Public policy, the discipline and its (re)'turns'.Progress in Human Geography. 2002;26:611-28.
17. Eversley D.The planner in society. London: Faber and Faber; 1973:.
18. Fainstein S.The just city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2010:.
19. Flyvbjerg B.Making social science matter. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
20. Flyvbjerg B.Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Flyvbjerg B.Schram S.Landman T., ed. London: Cambridge University Press; 2012:133-71.
21. Flyvbjerg B.,Richardson T.Planning futures: New directions for planning theory. Allmendinger P.Tewdwr-Jones M., ed. London: Routledge; 2002:44-62.
22. Ford K.The trouble with city planning. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2010:.
23. Forester J.Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1989:.
24. Forester J.Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
25. Friedmann J.Retracking America. New York: Doubleday Anchor; 1973:.
26. Friedmann J.Planning in the public domain. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1987:.
27. Friedmann J.Insurgencies: Essays in planning theory. New York: Routledge; 2011:.
28. Gans H.A Handbook of Public Sociology. Jeffries I., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2009:123-34.
29. Gilbert A.Epilogue to Return of the Slum special feature.City. 2011;15 (6): 722-26.
30. Glenn N.A handbook of public sociology. Jeffries I., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2009:135-50.
31. Gold R. L.Roles in sociological field observations.Social Forces. 1958;36 (3): 217-23.
32. Goldstein H.,Maier G.The use and valuation of journals in planning scholarship: Peer assessment versus impact factors.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2010;30:66-75.
33. Hartman C.Uppity and out: A case study in the politics of faculty reappointments (and the limitations of grievance procedures). Trumpbour J., ed. Boston, MA: South End Press; 1989:287-302.
34. Hartman C.Between eminence & notoriety: Four decades of radical urban planning. New Brunswick, NJ: Centre for Urban Policy Research; 2002:.
35. Harvey D.What kind of geography for what kind of public policy.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 1974;63:18-24.
36. Healey P.Researching planning practice.The Town Planning Review. 1991;62 (4): 447-59.
37. Hoch CharlesWhat planners do: Power, politics and persuasion. Chicago: American Planning Association/Planners Press; 1994:.
38. Hoch C.,Cibulskis A.Planning threatened: A preliminary report of planners and political conflict.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1987;6:99-107.
39. Hopkins L. D.Planning as science: Engaging disagreement.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2001;20 (4): 399-406.
40. Innes J.Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1995;14 (3): 183-89.
41. Innes J.,Gruber J.Planning styles in conflict: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2005;71 (2): 177-88.
42. Jeffries I.Handbook of public sociology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2009:.
43. Krumholz N.,Forester J.Making equity planning work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1990:.
44. Leavitt J.,Heffernan K.From the Studio to the Streets: Service Learning in Planning and Architecture. Hardin M. C., ed. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education; 2005:99-115.
45. Leavitt J.,Saegert S.From abandonment to hope: Community households in Harlem. New York: Columbia University Press; 1990:.
46. Martin R. L.Geography and public policy: The case of the missing agenda.Progress in Human Geography. 2001;25:189-210.
47. Mason D. R.,Beard V. A.Community-based planning and poverty alleviation in Oaxaca, Mexico.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2008;27:245-60.
48. Mead L. M.Scholasticism in political science.Perspectives on Politics. 2010;8 (2): 453-64.
49. Miraftab F.Public-private partnerships: The Trojan horse of neoliberal development?.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2004;24:89-101.
50. Miraftab F.Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the Global South.Planning Theory. 2009;8 (1): 32-50.
51. Myers D.,Banerjee T.Toward greater heights for planning: Reconciling the differences between profession, practice and academic field.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2005;71 (2): 121-29.
52. Nelson M.,Wolf-Powers L.Chains and ladders: Exploring the opportunities for workforce development and poverty reduction in the hospital sector.Economic Development Quarterly. 2010;24 (1): 33-44.
53. Neuman J.,Korenstein D.,Ross J.,Keyhani S.Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional study.British Medical Association Journal. 2011;343:d5621.
54. Nyden P.,Wiewel W.Collaborative research: Harnessing the tensions between researcher and practitioner.The American Sociologist. 1992;23 (4): 43-55.
55. Oliver M.Changing the social relations of research production.Disability, Handicap & Society. 1992;7 (2): 101-14.
56. Pal L. A.Consulting critics: A new role for academic policy analysts.Policy Sciences. 1985;18:357-69.
57. Pickerill J.The surprising sense of hope.Antipode. 2008;40:482-87.
58. Piven F. F.Reflections on scholarship and activism.Antipode. 2010;42:806-10.
59. Prins E.Framing a conflict in a community-university partnership.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2005;25 (1): 57-74.
60. Reardon K. M.,Green R.,Bates L. K.,Kiely R. C.Overcoming the challenges of post-disaster planning in New Orleans: Lessons from the ACORN housing/university collaborative.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2009;28:391-400.
61. Reardon K.Enhancing the capacity of community-based organizations in East St. Louis.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1998;17 (4): 323-33.
62. Reardon K.Empowerment planning in East St. Louis, Illinois.City. 2005;9 (1): 85-100.
63. Reardon K.,Welsh J.,Kreiswirth B.,Forester J.The American Sociologist. Spring:; 1993:69-91.
64. Routledge P.Acting in the network: ANT and the politics of generating associations.Environment and Planning D. 2008;26 (2): 199-217.
65. Sager T.Responsibilities of theorists: The case of communicative planning theory.Progress in Planning. 2009;72:1-51.
66. Sandercock L.Towards cosmopolis. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1998:.
67. Sandercock L.Multimedia explorations in urban policy and planning: beyond the Flatlands. Sandercock L.Attili G., ed. New York: Springer; 2010a:317-27.
68. Sandercock L.Multimedia explorations in urban policy and planning: beyond the Flatlands. Sandercock L.Attili G., ed. New York: Springer; 2010b:57-83.
69. Sandercock L.,Attili G.Digital ethnography as planning praxis.Planning Theory & Practice. 2010;11 (1): 23-45.
70. Schon D.The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books; 1983:.
71. Schuman A. W.From the studio to the streets: Service learning in planning and architecture. Hardin M. C., ed. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education; 2005:1-17.
72. Sletto B.Educating reflective practitioners: Learning to embrace the unexpected through service learning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2010;29 (4): 403-15.
73. Soja E.Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2010:.
74. Stein A.Bureaucratic culture and escalating world problems: Advancing the Sociological imagination. Knottnerus J. D.Phillips B., ed. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers; 2009:156-71.
75. Ward K.Geography and public policy: A recent history of "policy relevance.".Progress in Human Geography. 2005;29 (3): 310-19.
76. Warner M. E.,Hefetz A.Privatization and reverse privatization in US local government service delivery, 2002-2007. Public Service International and the Council of Global Unions Conference; 2010Geneva, Switzerland; 2010.
77. Watson V.Do we learn from planning practice? The contribution of the practice movement to planning theory.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2002;22 (2): 178-87.
78. Winkler T.Prolonging the global age of gentrifications: Johannesburg's regeneration policies.Planning Theory. 2009;8 (4): 362-81.