Planning styles in conflict: The metropolitan transportation commission

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 177-188

  Innes, Judith E ^a   Gruber, Judith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANNING PRACTICE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

NORTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 21444461067     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360508976691     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alinsky, S., 1989. Rules for radicals:A practical primer for realistic radicals, New York:Vintage Books.
2. Allison, G. T., 1971. The essence of decision:Explaining the Cuban missile crisis, Boston:Little Brown.
3. Bachrach, P., and Baratz, M. S., 1970. Power and poverty:Theory and practice, New York:Oxford University Press.
4. Banfield, E. C., 1961. Political influence:A new theory of urban politics, New York:Free Press.
5. Banfield, E, and Wilson, J. Q., 1961. City politics, New York:Vintage Books.
6. Banks, J. H., 1977. Political influence in transportation planning:The San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission Regional Transportation Plan, University of California. BerkeleyUnpublished doctoral dissertation
7. Benveniste, G., 1977. The politics of expertise, San Francisco:Boyd and Fraser.
8. Benveniste, G., 1989. Mastering the politics of planning, San Francisco:Jossey Bass.
9. Booher, D. E, and Innes, J. E., 2002. Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21 (3):221–236.
10. Braybrooke, D., and Lindblom, C. E., 1963. A strategy of decision:Policy evaluation as a social process, New York:Free Press.
11. Castells, M., 1985. The city and grassroots, Berkeley:University of California Press.
12. Chisholm, D., 1989. Coordination without hierarchy:Informal structures in multiorganisational systems, Berkeley:University of California Press.
13. Christensen, K. S., 1985. Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 51:63–73.
14. Connick, S., 2003. The use of collaborative processes in the making of California water policy, Berkeley:University of California. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
15. Connick, S., and Innes, J., 2003. Outcomes of collaborative water policy making:Applying complexity theory to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46 (2):177–197.
16. Dahl, R. 1961. Who governs:Democracy and power in an American city, New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
17. Davidoff, P., 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31:103–115.
18. Dempsey, P. S., Goetz, A., and Larson, C., March 2000. Metropolitan planning organizations:An assessment of the planning process, March, Denver, CO:University of Denver Intermodal Transportation Institute & National Center for Intermodal Transportation. Report to Congress
19. Flyvbjerg, B., 1998. Rationality and power:Democracy in practice, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
20. Friedmann, J., 1987. Planning in the public domain:From knowledge to action, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
21. Geertz, C., 1973. Interpretation of cultures, New York:Basic Books.
22. Glaser, B. G., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory:Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago:Aldine.
23. Harvey, D., 2000. Spaces of hope, Berkeley:University of California Press.
24. Hoch, C., 1994. What planners do:Power, politics & persuasion, Chicago:APA Planners Press.
25. Howe, E., 1994. Acting on ethics in city planning, New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
26. Innes, J. E., 1998. Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64:52–63.
27. Innes, J. E., 2004. Consensus building:Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3 (1) March:5–20.
28. Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E., 1999a. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems:A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65:412–23.
29. Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E., 1999b. Consensus building as role playing and bricolage:Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65:9–26.
30. Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E., 2000. “ Planning institutions in the network society:Theory for collaborative planning ”. In Revival of strategic spatial planning, Edited by:Salet, W., and Faludi, A., 175–189. Amsterdam:Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences.
31. Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E., 2003. “ Collaborative policymaking:Governance through dialogue ”. In Deliberative policy analysis:Understanding governance in the network society, Edited by:M. A., Hajer, and H., Wagenaar. 33–59. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
32. Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E., 2004. Reframing public participation:Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5 (4):419–436.
33. Innes, J. E., and Gruber, J., 2001. Bay Area transportation decision making in the wake of ISTEA:Planning styles in conflict at the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Berkeley:University of California Transportation Center. http://www.uctc.net/papers/papersalpha.html#IAlso available at Monograph
34. Innes, J. E., Gruber, J., Neuman, M., and Thompson, R. 1994. Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus building, Berkeley:University of California. www.ucop.edu/cprc/pubsarch2.html#growthCalifornia Policy Seminar. Available on-line at, (CPS Report:A Policy Research Program Report)
35. Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, F. P., 1997. Joining together:Group theory and group skills, 6th ed., Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
36. Lewis, P., and Sprague, M., 1997. Federal transportation policy and the role of the metropolitan planning organizations, San Francisco:Public Policy Institute of California.
37. Lewis, S. L., 1998. Land use and transportation:Envisioning regional sustainability. Transport Policy, 5:147–161.
38. Lindblom, C. E., 1990. Inquiry and change:The troubled attempt to understand and shape society, New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
39. Metropolitan Transportation Commission. 1995. Citizens' guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission:Basics on the Bay Area s transportation planning, financing and coordinating agency, 2nd ed., Oakland, CA:Author.
40. Metropolitan Transportation Commission. 1999. ipp8 regional transportation plan for the San Francisco Bay Area, Oakland, CA:Author.
41. Metropolitan Transportation Commission. June 2000. Bay Area transportation blueprint for the 21st century:Evaluation report, June, Oakland, CA:Author.
42. Peattie, L., 1987. Planning:Rethinking Ciudad Guayana, Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press.
43. Perelman, M., 1985. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Berkeley:Institute for Governmental Studies, University of California.
44. Robinson, I. M., ed. 1972. Decision making in urban planning:An introduction to new methodologies, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
45. Schlosberg, D., 1999. Environmental justice and the new pluralism:The challenge of difference for environmentalism, Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
46. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., and Thomas-Larmer, J., eds. 1999. The consensus building handbook:A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
47. Yankelovich, D., 1991. Coming to public judgment, Syracuse, NY:Syracuse University Press.
48. Yankelovich, D., 1999. The magic of dialogue:Transforming conflict into cooperation, New York:Simon and Schuster.
49. Younger, K. E, and Murray, D. G., 1992. Developing a method of multimodal priority setting for transportation projects in the San Francisco Bay Area in response to the opportunities in the ISTEA Oakland, CA Unpublished manuscript