Effects of Salinity and Soil-Drying on Radiation Use Efficiency, Water Productivity and Yield of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)

Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Volumn 198, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 173-184

  Razzaghi, F ^a   Ahmadi, S H ^b   Jacobsen, S E ^c   Jensen, C R ^c   Andersen, M N ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Chenopodium quinoa; Radiation use efficiency; Salt stress; Soil drying stress; Water productivity; Yield components

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATION; AGRONOMY; CROP PRODUCTION; CROP YIELD; DROUGHT; DRY MATTER; HERB; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; LYSIMETER; SALINITY;

CHENOPODIUM QUINOA;

EID: 84860657729     PISSN: 09312250     EISSN: 1439037X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00496.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ali, M., C. R. Jensen, V. O. Mogensen, M. N. Andersen, and I. E. Henson, 1999: Root signaling and osmotic adjustment during the intermittent soil drying sustain grain yield of field grown wheat. Field Crops Res. 62, 35-52.
2. Andersen, M. N., C. R. Jensen, and R. Lösch, 1992: The interaction effects of potassium and drought in field-grown barley. I. Yield, water-use efficiency and growth. Acta Agric. Scand., B 42, 34-44.
3. Andersen, M. N., T. Heidmann, and F. Plauborg, 1996: The effects of drought and nitrogen on light interception, growth and yield of winter oilseed rape. Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci. 46, 55-67.
4. Andersen, M. N., F. Asch, Y. Wu, C. R. Jensen, H. Næsted, V. O. Mogensen, and K. E. Koch, 2002: Soluble invertase expression is an early target of drought stress during the critical, abortion-sensitive phase of young ovary development in maize. Plant Physiol. 130, 591-604.
5. Ayers, R. S., and D. W. Westcot, 1985: Water Quality for Agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 rev. 1. FAO, Rome, 174 p.
6. Bertero, H. D., and R. A. Ruiz, 2008: Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 28, 186-194.
7. Bertero, D., D. Medan, and A. J. Hall, 1996: Changes in apical morphology during floral initiation and reproductive development in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Ann. Bot. 78, 317-324.
8. Boscaiu, M., E. Estrelles, P. Soriano, and O. Vicente, 2005: Effects of salt stress on the reproductive biology of the halophyte Plantago crassifolia. Biol. Plant. 49, 141-143.
9. Bosque Sanchez, H., R. Lemeur, P. Van Damme, and S.-E. Jacobsen, 2003: Ecophysiological analysis of drought and salinity stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Rev. Int. 19, 111-119.
10. Boyer, J. S., 1996: Advances in drought tolerance in plants. Adv. Agron. 56, 187-218.
11. Christensen, S., and J. Goudriaan, 1993: Deriving light interception and biomass from spectral reflectance ratio. Remote Sens. Environ. 43, 87-95.
12. Davidonis, G. H., A. Johnson, and J. A. Landivar, 2000: Cotton mote frequency under rainfed and irrigated condition. J. Cotton Sci. 4, 1-9.
13. Debez, A., K. B. Hamed, C. Grignon, and C. Abdelly, 2004: Salinity effects on germination, growth, and seed production of the halophyte Cakile maritime. Plant Soil 262, 179-189.
14. Dixit, P. N., and D. Chen, 2010: Impact of spatially variable soil salinity on crop physiological properties, soil water content and yield of wheat in a semi arid environment. Aust. J. Agric. Eng. 1, 93-100.
15. Doorenbos, J., and A. H. Kassam, 1979: Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 33. FAO, Rome, 193 p.
16. Garcia, M., D. Raes, and S.-E. Jacobsen, 2003: Evapotranspiration analysis and irrigation requirements of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) in the Bolivian highlands. Agr. Water Manage. 60, 119-134.
17. Garcia, M., D. Raes, S.-E. Jacobsen, and T. Michel, 2007: Agroclimatic constraints for rainfed agriculture in the Bolivian Altiplano. J. Arid Environ. 71, 109-121.
18. Glenn, E. P., and J. J. Brown, 1998: Effects of soil salt levels on the growth and water use efficiency of Atriplex Canescene (Chenopodiaceae) varieties in drying soil. Am. J. Bot. 85, 10-16.
19. Glenn, E., J. J. Brown, and E. Blumwald, 1999: Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18, 227-255.
20. Gómez-Pando, L. R., R. Álvarez-Castro, and A. Eguiluz-de Ia Barra, 2010: Effect of salt stress on Peruvian germplasm of Chenopodium quinoa Willd.: a promising crop. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 196, 391-396.
21. Hansen, B., 1989: Determination of nitrogen as elementary N, and alternative to Kjeldahl. Acta Agric. Scand. 39, 113-118.
22. Hariadi, Y., K. Marandon, Y. Tian, S.-E. Jacobsen, and S. Shabala, 2010: Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants grown at various salinity levels. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 185-193.
23. Jacobsen, S.-E., and A. Mujica, 2003: Quinoa: an alternative crop for saline soils. J. Exp. Bot. 54(Suppl. 1), i25.
24. Jacobsen, S.-E., H. Quispe, and A. Mujica, 2001: An alternative crop for saline soils in the Andes. In: Scientist and Farmer-Partners in Research for the 21st Century. CIP Program Report 1999-2000, pp. 403-408.
25. Jacobsen, S.-E., A. Mujica, and C. R. Jensen, 2003a: Resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. J. Exp. Bot. 54(Suppl. 1), i21.
26. Jacobsen, S.-E., A. Mujica, and C. R. Jensen, 2003b: The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Rev. Int. 19, 99-109.
27. Jacobsen, S.-E., C. Monteros, J. L. Christiansen, L. A. Bravo, L. J. Corcuera, and A. Mujica, 2005: Plant responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to frost at various phenological stages. Eur. J. Agron. 22, 131-139.
28. Jacobsen, S.-E., C. Monteros, L. J. Corcuera, L. A. Bravo, J. L. Christiansen, and A. Mujica, 2007: Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Eur. J. Agron. 26, 471-475.
29. Jacobsen, S.-E., F. Liu, and C. R. Jensen, 2009: Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Sci. Hortic. 122, 281-287.
30. Jamieson, P. D., R. J. Martin, G. S. Francis, and D. R. Wilson, 1995: Drought effects on biomass production and radiation use efficiency in barley. Field Crops Res. 43, 77-86.
31. Katerji, N., M. Mastrorilli, J. W. Van Hoorn, F. Z. Lahmer, A. Hamdy, and T. Oweis, 2009: Durum wheat and barley productivity in saline-drought environments. Eur. J. Agron. 31, 1-9.
32. Legg, B. J., W. Day, D. W. Lawlor, and K. J. Parkinson, 1979: The effects of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. J. Agric. Sci. 92, 703-716.
33. Lodhi, A., M. Arshad, F. Azam, and M. H. Sajjad, 2009: Changes in mineral and mineralizable N of soil incubated at varying salinity, moisture and temperature regimes. Pak. J. Bot. 41, 967-980.
34. McCree, K., 1986: Whole-plant carbon balance during osmotic adjustment to drought and salinity stress. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 43-44.
35. Mogensen, V. O., 1985: Growth rate of grains and grain yield of wheat in relation to drought. Acta Agric. Scand. 35, 353-360.
36. Monteith, J. L., 1977: Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 281, 277-294.
37. Monteith, J. L., 1989: Steps in crop climatology. In: P. W. Unger, W. R. Jordan, T. V. Sneed, and R. W. Jensen, eds. Proc. Int. Conf. Dryland FarmingAmarillo/Bushland, TX, pp. 273-282. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
38. Monteith, J. L., 1994: Validity of the correlation between intercepted radiation and biomass. Agric. For. Meteorol. 68, 213-220.
39. Monteith, J. L., and M. H. Unsworth, 1990: Principles of Environmental Physics. Edward Arnold, London, 291 p.
40. Munns, R., 2002: Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 239-250.
41. Munns, R., 2009: Strategies for crop improvement in saline soils. In: M. Ashraf, M. Ozturk, and H. R. Athar, eds. Salinity and Water Stress: Improving Crop Efficiency, pp. 99-110. Springer, The Netherlands.
42. Pessarakli, M., 1991: Dry matter yield, nitrogen-15 absorption, and water up take by green bean under sodium chloride stress. Crop Sci. 31, 1633-1640.
43. Plauborg, F. L., B. V. Iversen, and P. E. Lærke, 2005: In situ comparison of three dielectric soil moisture sensors in drip irrigated sandy soils. Vadose Zone J. 4, 1037-1047.
44. Razzaghi, F., S. H. Ahmadi, V. I. Adolf, C. R. Jensen, S.-E. Jacobsen, and M. N. Andersen, 2011: Water relations and transpiration of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under salinity and soil drying. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 197, 348-360.
45. Repo-Carrasco, R., C. Espinoza, and S.-E. Jacobsen, 2003: Nutritional value and use of the Andean crops quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Rev. Int. 19, 179-189.
46. Richards, R. A., 1992: Increasing salinity tolerance of grain crops: is it worthwhile? Plant Soil 146, 89-98.
47. Rosa, M., M. Hilal, J. A. Gonzalez, and F. E. Prado, 2009: Low-temperature effect on enzyme activities involved in sucrose-starch partitioning in salt-stressed and salt-acclimated cotyledons of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 47, 300-307.
48. Ruales, J. B., and M. Nair, 1992: Nutritional quality of the protein in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoaWilld.) seeds. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 42, 1-11.
49. Ruffino, A. M. C., M. Rosa, M. Hilal, J. A. Gonzalez, and F. E. Prado, 2010: The role of cotyledon metabolism in the establishment of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seedlings growing under salinity. Plant Soil 326, 213-224.
50. Ruiz, R. A., and H. D. Bertero, 2008: Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 29, 144-152.
51. SAS Institute Inc., 2007: SAS Procedure Guide, Version 9.2, Cary, NC, USA.
52. Schleiff, U., and G. Schaffer, 1983: The effect of decreasing soil osmotic and soil matric water potential in the rhizosphere of a loamy and a sandy soil on the water uptake rate of wheat roots. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 153, 373-384.
53. Shalhevet, J., 1993: Plants under water and salt stress. In: L. Fowden, T. Mansfield, and J. Stoddart, eds. Plant Adaptation to Environ-Mental Stress, pp. 133-154. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA.
54. Sharma, S. K., and I. C. Gupta, 1986: Saline Environment and Plant Growth. Agro Botanical Publishers, Bikaner, India, p 92.
55. Sinclair, T. R., and R. C. Muchow, 1999: Radiation use efficiency. Adv. Agron. 65, 215-265.
56. Slama, I., T. Ghnaya, A. Savouré, and C. Abdelly, 2008: Combined effects of long-term salinity and soil-drying on growth, water relations, nutrient status and proline accumulation of Sesuvium portulacastrum. Plant Biol. Pathol. 331, 442-451.
57. Vacher, J. J., 1998: Response of two main Andean crops, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and papa amarga (Solanum Juzepczukii Buk.) to drought on the Bolivian Altiplano: significance of local adaptation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 68, 99-108.
58. Vega-Gálvez, A., M. Miranda, J. Vergara, E. Uribe, L. Puente, and E. A. Martínez, 2010: Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 90, 2541-2547.
59. Wang, D., M. C. Shannon, and C. M. Grieve, 2001: Salinity reduces radiation absorption and use efficiency in soybean. Field Crops Res. 69, 267-277.
60. Yeo, A., and T. Flowers, 1986: Ion transport in Suaeda maritima: its relation to growth and implications for the pathway of radial transport of ions across the root. J. Exp. Bot. 37, 143-159.