The institutional turn in election law scholarship

Race, Reform, and Regulation of the Electoral Process: Recurring Puzzles in American Democracy

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 86-100

  Gerken, Heather K ^a   Kang, Michael S ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860634698     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511976612.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Bennett, Robert W. 2003. Talking It Through: Puzzles of American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2. Cain, Bruce. 1999. “Garrett’s Temptation.” Virginia Law Review 85: 1589.
3. Charles, Guy. 2002. “Constitutional Pluralism and Democratic Politics.” North Carolina Law Review 80: 1103.
4. Cox, Gary and Jonathan Katz. 2002. Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Elmendorf, Christopher. 2005. “Representation Reinforcement through Advisory Commissions: The Case of Election Law.” New York University Law Review 80: 1366.
6. Elmendorf, Christopher and Heather Gerken. 2004. “Next Time, Start with the People.” Balkinization (Nov. 10).
7. Foley, Edward. 2008. “Let’s Not Repeat 2000.” Legal Times XXXI.62 (April 21).
8. Garrett, Elizabeth. 2002. “Is the Party Over? Courts and the Political Process.” Supreme Court Review 2002: 95–152.
9. Gerken, Heather. 2004. “Lost in the Political Thicket.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153: 503.
10. Gerken, Heather. 2005. “Citizens Must Drive Electoral Reform.” Roll Call (Nov. 15).
11. Gerken, Heather. 2006. “A Third Way for the Voting Rights Act: Section 5 and the Opt-In Approach.” Columbia Law Review 106: 708.
12. Gerken, Heather. 2007. “The Double-Edged Sword of Independence.” Election Law Journal 6: 184.
13. Gerken, Heather. 2008. “Out of the Shadows: Private Redistricting Can Help Overcome Lawmakers’ Partisanship.” Legal Times XXXI.18 (May 5).
14. Gerken, Heather. 2009a. The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Gerken, Heather. 2009b. “Getting from Here to There in Election Reform: A Trio of Ideas.” Election Reform Agenda Conference. University of Iowa.
16. Gerken, Heather. 2010. “Keynote Address: Getting from Here to There in Redistricting Reform.” Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Policy 5: 1–15.
17. Gersen, Jacob and Adrian Vermeule. 2007. “Chevron as a Voting Rule.” Yale Law Review 115: 676.
18. Hasen, Richard. 1997. “Entrenching Duopoly.” Supreme Court Review 1997: 331.
19. Hasen, Richard. 1999. “Introduction: Election Law at Puberty: Optimism and Words of Caution.” Loyola LA Law Review 32: 1095.
20. Hirsch, Sam. 2002. “Unpacking Page v. Bartels: A Fresh Redistricting Paradigm Emerges in New Jersey.” Election Law Journal 1: 7.
21. Issacharoff, Samuel. 2004. “Gerrymandering and Political Cartels.” Harvard Law Review 116: 593.
22. Issacharoff, Samuel. 2004. “Is Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act a Victim of Its Own Success.” Columbia Law Review 104: 1710.
23. Pamela Karlan. 1999. “The Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Reform.” Texas Law Review 77: 1705.
24. Richard Pildes. 1998. “Politics as Markets.” Stanford Law Review 50: 643.
25. Kang, Michael. 2005. “The Hydraulics and Politics of Party Regulation.” Iowa Law Review 91: 131.
26. Kang, Michael. 2006. “De-Rigging Elections.” Washington University Law Review 84: 667.
27. Kang, Michael. 2007a. “To Here from Theory.” Texas Law Review 87: 787.
28. Kang, Michael. 2007b. “When Courts Won’t Make Law.” Ohio State Law Journal 68: 1097.
29. Kang, Michael. 2008. “Race and Democratic Contestation.” Yale Law Review 117: 734.
30. Kang, Michael. 2011. “Sore Loser Laws and Democratic Contestation.” Georgetown Law Journal forthcoming.
31. Karlan, Pamela. 1992. “Rights to Vote: Some Pessimism about Formalism.” Texas Law Review 71: 1705.
32. Karlan, Pamela. 2004. “Ashcroft and the Retrogression of Retrogression.” Election Law Journal 3(1): 21.
33. Lowenstein, Daniel Hays. 1993. “Associational Rights of Major Political Parties.” Texas Law Review 71: 1741.
34. Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 2008. The Powers to Lead. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Pildes, Richard. 2001. “Democracy and Disorder.” University of Chicago Law Review 68: 695.
36. Pildes, Richard. 2004a. “The Constitutionalization of Democratic Politics.” Harvard Law Review 118: 28.
37. Pildes, Richard. 2004b. “Competitive, Deliberative, and Rights-Oriented Democracy.” Election Law Journal 3: 685.
38. Pildes, Richard. 2007. Proposal for Tobin Project Working Group Meeting, “Getting from Here to There in Election Reform,” Tobin Project, Democratic Institutions Working Group, Cambridge MA (unpublished paper; on file with author).
39. Pitts, Michael J. 2007. “Defining ‘Partisan’ Law Enforcement.” Stanford Law and Policy Review 18: 324.
40. Tribe, Laurence. 1999. “The Supreme Court 1998 Term – Comment: Saenz Sans Prophesy: Does the Privileges or Immunities Revival Reveal the Future – Or Expose the Hidden Structure of the Present?” Harvard Law Review 113: 110.