Public awareness and perceptions of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS): Insights from surveys administered to representative samples in six European countries

Energy Procedia

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 6300-6306

  Pietzner, Katja ^a   Schumann, Diana ^b   Tvedt, Sturle D ^c,d   Torvatn, Hans Y ^c   Næss, Robert ^c,d   Reiner, David M ^e   Anghel, Sorin ⁱ   Cismaru, Diana ^j   Constantin, Carmencita ^g   Daamen, Dancker D L ^h   Dudu, Alexandra ⁱ   Esken, Andrea ^j   Gemeni, Vassiliki ^f   Ivan, Loredana ^j   Koukouzas, Nikolaos ^f   Kristiansen, Glenn ^e   Markos, Angelos ^k   Ter Mors, Emma ^h   Nihfidov, Oana C ^g   Papadimitriou, John ^f   Samoila, Irene R ^g   Sava, Constantin S ⁱ   Stephenson, Mike H ^l   Terwel, Bart W ^h   Tomescu, Claudia E ^g   Ziogou, Fotini ^f   more..

^a Institute for Ecological Economy Research   (Germany)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^c SINTEF   (Norway)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^f INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INSTITUTE   (Greece)

^g Institute for Studies and Power Engineering (ISPE)   (Romania)

^h LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

ⁱ NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEO ECOLOGY GEOECOMAR   (Romania)

^j National School of Political Studies and Public Administration   (Romania)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA   (Greece)

^l BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Capture and storage technologies; Ccs; Perception; Public awareness

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; GREENHOUSE GASES; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SURVEYS;

CAPTURE AND STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES; CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE; COMMUNICATION METHOD; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH; PUBLIC AWARENESS; PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING; REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE;

CARBON CAPTURE;

EID: 79955399537     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.645     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Ashworth P, Gardner J. Understanding and Incorporating Stakeholder Perspectives to Low Emission Technologies in New South Wales. Centre for Low Emission Technology. Kenmore, Australia; 2006.
2. 2 mitigation options. Results of a nationwide Information-Choice Questionnaire survey. Universiteit Leiden; 2008.
3. Fischedick M. et al.. Stakeholder acceptance of carbon capture and storage in Germany. Proceedings of the GHGT-9, Washington DC, USA; 16-20 November 2008, p. 4783-7.
4. Daamen, DDL et al.. Pseudo-opinions on CCS technologies. Paper presented at GHGT-8, Trondheim, Norway; 18-22 June 2006.
5. 2 capture and storage technologies: Well-informed and well-considered opinions versus uninformedpseudo-opinions of the Dutch public. Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; 2006.
6. Pietzner K. et al.. Scrutinizing the impact of CCS communication on the general and local public: Results of the representative national surveys of public awareness, knowledge and opinions concerning CCS. Research report. March 2010.
7. Terwel BW. et al.. Scrutinizing the impact of CCS communication on opinion quality: An experimental comparison between Focus Group Discussions versus Information-Choice Questionnaires (ICQs): Results from cross-national analyses. Research report. December 2009.