Disease ontogeny overshadows effects of climate and species interactions on population dynamics in a nonnative forest disease complex

Ecography

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 412-421

  Garnas, Jeffrey R ^a,b   Houston, David R ^c   Ayres, Matthew P ^a   Evans, Celia ^d  

^a Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

^c US Forest Service retired   (United States)

^d PAUL SMITH S COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRYING CAPACITY; CLIMATE EFFECT; COLONIZATION; DECIDUOUS FOREST; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; DISEASE SPREAD; FUNGUS; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; INSECT; ONTOGENY; POPULATION GROWTH; STAND DYNAMICS;

UNITED STATES;

CRYPTOCOCCUS FAGISUGA; FAGUS; FUNGI; HEMIPTERA; HEXAPODA; NEONECTRIA;

EID: 84860610239     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06938.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson D. R. 2008. Model based inference in the life sciences: a primer on evidence. - Springer.
2. Anderson R. M. and May R. M. 1979. Population biology of infectious-diseases. 1. - Nature 280: 361-367.
3. Avery T. E. and Burkhart H. E. 2002. Forest measurements. - McGraw-Hill.
4. Berryman A. A. et al. 1987. Natural regulation of herbivorous forest insect populations. - Oecologia 71: 174-184.
5. Berryman A. A. et al. 2002. Population regulation, emergent properties, and a requiem for density dependence. - Oikos 99: 600-606.
6. Bjørnstad O. N. 2009. Ncf: spatial nonparametric covariance functions. R package ver. 1.1-1.
7. Bleiker K. P. and Six D. L. 2007. Dietary benefits of fungal associates to an eruptive herbivore: potential implications of multiple associates on host population dynamics. - Environ. Entomol. 36: 1384-1396.
8. Brasier C. M. 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. - Mycopathologia 115: 151-161.
9. Burdon J. J. et al. 2006. The current and future dynamics of disease in plant communities. - Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 44: 19-39.
10. Castlebury L. A. et al. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of Neonectria/Cylindrocarpon on Fagus in North America. - Can. J. Bot. 84: 1417-1433.
11. Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 343-366.
12. Dean A. M. 1983. A simple model of mutualism. - Am. Nat. 121: 409-417.
13. Dukes J. S. et al. 2009. Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: what can we predict? - Can. J. For. Res. 39: 231-248.
14. Ehrlich J. 1934. The beech bark disease: a Nectria disease of Fagus, following Cryptococcus fagi (Baer.). - Can. J. Res. 10: 593-692.
15. Estay S. A. et al. 2009. Predicting insect pest status under climate change scenarios: combining experimental data and population dynamics modeling. - J. Appl. Entomol. 133: 491-499.
16. Garnas J. 2009. Organism interactions and forest structural change in a nonnative disease complex: beech bark disease in North America. - PhD thesis, Dartmouth college, Hanover, USA.
17. Garnas J. et al. 2011. Subcontinental impacts of an invasive tree disease on forest structure and dynamics. J. Ecol. 99: 532-541.
18. Giraudoux P. 2008. Pgirmess: data analysis in ecology. R package ver. 1.3.7.
19. Gove J. H. and Houston D. R. 1996. Monitoring the growth of American beech affected by beech bark disease in Maine using the Kalman filter. - Environ. Ecol. Stat. 3: 167-187.
20. Hofstetter R. W. et al. 2006. Antagonisms, mutualisms and commensalisms affect outbreak dynamics of the southern pine beetle. Oecologia 147: 679-691.
21. Holt R. D. and Lawton J. H. 1994. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 495-520.
22. Houston D. R. 1975. Beech bark disease aftermath forests are structured for a new outbreak. - J. For. 73: 660-663.
23. Houston D. R. 1994. Major new tree disease epidemics beech bark disease. - Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 32: 7587.
24. Houston D. R. and Valentine H. T. 1988. Beech bark disease the temporal pattern of cankering in aftermath forests of Maine. - Can. J. For. Res. 18: 38-42.
25. Houston D. R. et al. 1979. Beech bark disease patterns of spread and development of the initiating agent Cryptococcus fagisuga. - Can. J. For. Res. 9: 336-344.
26. Houston D. R. et al. 2005. Spatial and temporal development of beech bark disease in the northeastern United States. In: Evans C. A. et al. (eds), Beech bark disease. Proceedings of the Beech Bark Disease Symposium, US. Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, pp. 43-47.
27. Klepzig K. D. and Six D. L. 2004. Bark beetle fungal symbiosis: context dependency in complex associations. - Symbiosis 37: 189-205.
28. Klepzig K. D. et al. 2009. Symbioses: a key driver of insect physiological processes, ecological interactions, evolutionary diversification, and impacts on humans. - Environ. Entomol. 38: 67-77.
29. Liebhold A. M. et al. 1995. Invasion by exotic forest pests a threat to forest ecosystems. - For. Sci. 41: 1-49.
30. Lombardero M. J. et al. 2003. Strong indirect interactions of Tarsonemus mites (Acarina: Tarsonemidae) and Dendroctonus frontalis. - Oikos 104: 208.
31. May R. M. 1976. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. - Nature 261: 459-467.
32. May R. M. 1982. Mutualistic interactions among species. - Nature 296: 803-804.
33. Moran P. A. P. 1953. The statistical analysis of the Canadian lynx cycle. 2. Synchronization and meteorology. - Aust. J. Zool. 1: 291-298.
34. Morin R. S. et al. 2007. Spread of beech bark disease in the eastern United States and its relationship to regional forest composition. - Can. J. For. Res. 37: 726-736.
35. Paillet F. 2002. Chestnut: history and ecology of a transformed species. - J. Biogeogr. 29: 1517-1530.
36. Parker I. M. and Gilbert G. S. 2004. The evolutionary ecology of novel plant pathogen interactions. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35: 675-700.
37. Peltonen M. et al. 2002. Spatial synchrony in forest insect outbreaks: roles of regional stochasticity and dispersal. - Ecology 83: 3120-3129.
38. Pollard E. et al. 1987. The detection of density-dependence from a series of annual censuses. - Ecology 68: 2046-2055.
39. Post E. 2005. Large-scale spatial gradients in herbivore population dynamics. - Ecology 86: 2320-2328.
40. Royama T. 1992. Analytical population dynamics. - Chapman and Hall.
41. Seppälä R. et al. (eds) 2009. Adaptation of forests and people to climate change: a global assessment report. - United Nations Forum on Forests (UNFF), International Union of Forest Research Organizations.
42. Shigo A. L. 1964. Organism interactions in beech bark disease. Phytopathology 54: 263-269.
43. Six D. L. and Klepzig K. D. 2004. Dendroctonus bark beetles as model systems for studies on symbiosis. - Symbiosis 37: 207-232.
44. Storer A. J. et al. 1997. Pitch canker disease of pines current and future impacts. - J. For. 95: 21-26.
45. Tobin P. C. and Bjørnstad O. N. 2003. Spatial dynamics and cross-correlation in a transient predator prey system. - J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 460-467.
46. Tran J. et al. 2007. Impact of minimum winter temperatures on the population dynamics of Dendroctonus frontalis. - Ecol. Appl. 17: 882-899.
47. Turchin P. 2003. Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. - Princeton Univ. Press.
48. Ungerer M. J. et al. 1999. Climate and the northern distribution limits of Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). - J. Biogeogr. 26: 1133-1145.
49. Wainhouse D. 1980. Dispersal of 1st instar larvae of the felted beech scale, Cryptococcus fagisuga. - J. Appl. Ecol. 17: 523-532.
50. Williams D. W. and Liebhold A. M. 2000. Spatial synchrony of spruce budworm outbreaks in eastern North America. Ecology 81: 2753-2766.
51. Woiwod I. P. and Hanski I. 1992. Patterns of density dependence in moths and aphids. - J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 619-629.
52. Ylioja T. et al. 1999. Host-driven population dynamics in an herbivorous insect. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96: 10735-10740.