The Effect of Sonority on Word Segmentation: Evidence for the Use of a Phonological Universal

Cognitive Science

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 655-673

  Ettlinger, Marc ^a   Finn, Amy S ^b   Hudson Kam, Carla L ^c  

^a Northern California Health Care System   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Language universals; Phonology; Sonority; Sonority sequencing principle; Word segmentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 84860578283     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01211.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9(4), 321-324.
2. Bartlett, S., Kondrak, G., & Cherry, C. (2009). On the syllabification of phonemes. Paper presented at the Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Boulder, CO.
3. Beckman, J. N. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology, 14, 1-46.
4. Berent, I., Lennertz, T., Jun, J., Moreno, M. A., & Smolensky, P. (2008). Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(14), 5321-5325.
5. Berent, I., Steriade, D., Lennertz, T., & Vaknin, V. (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition, 104(3), 591-630.
6. Blanchard, D., Heinz, J., & Golinkoff, R. (2010). Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 487-511.
7. Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81(2), B33-B44.
8. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
9. Church, K. W. (1987). Phonological parsing in speech recognition. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 1: Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 283-333). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Clements, G. N. (2006). Does sonority have a phonetic basis? In E. Raimy & C. E. Cairns (Eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory (pp. 165-176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Daland, R., Hayes, B., Garellek, M., White, J., Davis, A., & Norrmann, I. (2011). Explaining sonority projection effects. Phonology, 28(2), 197-234.
13. Davidson, L. (2006). Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 104-137.
14. Davis, M. (2004). Connectionist modelling of lexical segmentation and vocabulary acquisition. In P. Quinlan (Ed.), Connectionist models of development: Developmental processes in real and artificial neural networks (pp. 151-188). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
15. Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Science, 32(5), 429-448. discussion 448-494.
16. Finn, A. S., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2008). The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners' use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition, 108(2), 477-499.
17. Frank, M. C., Goldwater, S., Mansinghka, V., Griffiths, T., & Tenenbaum, J. (2007). Modeling human performance on statistical word segmentation tasks. In D. S. McNamara & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 281-286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Gierut, J. A. (1999). Syllable onsets: Clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(3), 708-726.
19. Gomez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431-436.
20. Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hyman, L. M. (2008). Universals in phonology. Linguistic Review, 25(1-2), 83-137.
22. Jakobson, R. (1962). Selected writings I: Phonological studies. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
23. Johnson, E. K., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 548-567.
24. Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1-23.
26. Jusczyk, P. W., Hohne, E. A., & Bauman, A. (1999). Infants' sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(8), 1465-1476.
27. Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in english-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3-4), 159-207.
28. Katz, J. (2005). SoftVoice. Los Angeles, CA: SoftVoice, Inc.
29. Levitt, A., Jusczyk, P. W., Murray, J., & Carden, G. (1988). Context effects in two-month-old infants' perception of labiodental/interdental fricative contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 361-368.
30. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6), 431-461.
31. MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (2000). On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science, 288(5465), 527-531.
32. Mattys, S. L., Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology, 38(4), 465-494.
33. Mattys, S. L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2007). Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(1), 554-567.
34. Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Words in puddles of sound: Modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 545-564.
35. Ohala, J. (1990). Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In M. Ziolkowski, M. Noske, & K. Deaton (Eds.), CLS 26: Volume 2: The Parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology (Vol. 26, pp. 319-338). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
36. Ohala, D. (1996). Cluster reduction and constraints in acquisition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.
37. Parker, S. (2008). Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 55-90.
38. Peperkamp, S. (2007). Do we have innate knowledge about phonological markedness? Comments on Berent, Steriade, Lennertz, and Vaknin. Cognition, 104(3), 631-637. discussion 638-643.
39. Redford, M. A. (2008). Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics. Cognition, 107(3), 785-816.
40. Rytting, C. A., Brew, C., & Fosler-Lussier, E. (2010). Segmenting words from natural speech: Subsegmental variation in segmental cues. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 513-543.
41. Saffran, J. R. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 172-196.
42. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928.
43. Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606-621.
44. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
45. Steriade, D. (1999). Alternatives to syllable-based accounts of consonantal phonotactics. In O. Fujimura, B. Joseph, & B. Palek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 linguistics and phonetics conference (pp. 205-242). Prague: Karolinum Press.
46. Swingley, D. (2005). Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary. Cognitive Psychology, 50(1), 86-132.
47. Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 706-716.
48. Tyler, M. D., & Cutler, A. (2009). Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(1), 367-376.
49. Vaux, B., & Wolfe, A. (2009). The appendix. In E. Raimy & C. E. Cairns (Eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology (pp. 101-143). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2004). Tuned to the signal: The privileged status of speech for young infants. Developmental Science, 7(3), 270-276.
51. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1992). The organization and reorganization of human speech perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 377-402.