State of the art on the Systems of Innovation research: A bibliometrics study up to 2009

Scientometrics

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 977-996

  Uriona Maldonado, Mauricio ^a,c   dos Santos, Raimundo N M ^b   Varvakis, Gregorio ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Innovation Systems; Systems of Innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860546677     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0653-5     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1995). The globalization of technology-A new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 121-140.
2. Arundel, A., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B. Ã., & Valeyre, A. (2007). How Europe's economies learn: A comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6), 1175-1210.
3. Bellis, N. d. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Maryland: Scarecrow Press.
4. Bowonder, B., & Miyake, T. (1992). A model of corporate innovation management-some recent high tech innovations in japan. R & D Management, 22(4), 319-335.
5. Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (1998). Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world. London: University College London Press.
6. Brooks, H. (1975). Military innovation system and qualitative arms-race. Daedalus, 104(3), 75-97.
7. Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93-118.
8. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233-245.
9. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations and Innovation), 128-152.
10. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems-competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365-382.
11. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491. doi: 10. 1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5.
12. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1563-1584.
13. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories-A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
14. Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R. R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. (Eds.). (1988). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers.
15. Edgington, D. W. (2008). The Japanese innovation system: University-industry linkages, small firms and regional technology clusters. Prometheus, 26(1), 1-19.
16. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter Publishers.
17. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
18. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.
19. Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national innovation system? In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330-348). London: Pinter Publishers.
20. Freeman, C. (1995). The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
21. Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems-Complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191-211.
22. Freeman, C. (2004). Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), 541-569. doi: 10. 1093/icc/dth022.
23. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38(4), 583-589. doi: 10. 1016/j. respol. 2009. 01. 018.
24. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933.
25. Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information Inc.
26. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.
27. Godin, B. (2009). National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective. Science Technology Human Values, 34(4), 476-501. doi: 10. 1177/0162243908329187.
28. Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C., & Sjoberg, N. (1992). External technology acquisition in large multitechnology corporations. R & D Management, 22(2), 111-133.
29. Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584-594. doi: 10. 1016/j. techfore. 2008. 04. 013.
30. Krupp, H. (1983). Overview of policy issues-panel report on the functions of non-university research institutes in national R-and-D and innovation systems and the contributions of universities. Technology in Society, 5(3-4), 251-256.
31. Lee, S. H., & Yoo, T. (2007). Government policy and trajectories of radical innovation in dirigiste states: A comparative analysis of national innovation systems in France and Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19, 451-470. doi: 10. 1080/09537320701403383.
32. Lundvall, B. A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process. From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349-369). London: Pinter Publishers.
33. Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
34. Lundvall, B. A. (1998). Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(4), 407-421.
35. Lundvall, B. A. (2004). Introduction to 'Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness' by Christopher Freeman. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), 531-539. doi: 10. 1093/icc/dth021.
36. Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213-231.
37. Macdowall, J. (1984). The technology innovation system in Japan. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1(3), 165-172.
38. Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264.
39. Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1999). Technological entry, exit and survival: An empirical analysis of patent data. Research Policy, 28(6), 643-660.
40. Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851.
41. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491-503.
42. Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1), 3-21.
43. Mowery, D. C. (1992). The U. S. national innovation system: Origins and prospects for change. Research Policy, 21(2), 125-144.
44. Nelson, R. R. (1988). Institutions supporting technical change in the United States. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 312-329). London: Pinter Publishers.
45. Nelson, R. R. (1992). National innovation systems: A retrospective on a study. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(2), 347-374. doi: 10. 1093/icc/1. 2. 347.
46. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Nelson, R. R. (2007). Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Globelics Working Paper Series (p. 25). Beijing: Globelics.
48. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
49. Niosi, J., & Tschang, F. T. (2009). The strategies of Chinese and Indian software multinationals: Implications for internationalization theory. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2), 269-294. doi: 10. 1093/icc/dtp005.
50. Niosi, J., Saviotti, P., Bellon, B., & Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovation: In search of a workable concept. Technology in Society, 15(2), 207-227.
51. OECD (Ed.). (1997). National innovation systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
52. OECD (Ed.). (2009a). Measuring China's innovation system-National specificities and international comparisons (Statistical Analysis of Science, Technology and Industry). Paris: OECD Publishing.
53. OECD (Ed.). (2009b). OECD reviews of innovation policy-Korea. Paris: OECD.
54. Okubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples. Paris: OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
55. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343-373.
56. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
57. Santos, R. N. M. (2003). Indicadores estratégicos em ciência e tecnologia: refletindo a sua prática como dispositivo de inclusão/exclusão social. TransInformação, 15(Edição Especial), 129-140.
58. Santos, R. N. M., & Kobashi, N. Y. (2009). Bibliometria, cientometria, infometria: conceitos e aplicações. Pesq. bras. Ci. Inf., 2(1), 155-172.
59. Shapiro, I. S. (1979). Does the judicial system stifle innovation? Judicature, 63(2), 57-58.
60. Sharif, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept. Research Policy, 35(5), 745-766.
61. Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature-New measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
62. Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: The Guilford Press.
63. Thornton, R. (1979). Patent issue-Effects of the patent system on innovation. Research Management, 22(2), 33-35.
64. van Leeuwen, T. N. (2006). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, 66(1), 133-154. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-006-0010-7.
65. van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257-280.
66. van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 12(1), 20-29.
67. Vanti, N. A. P. (2002). Da bibliometria à webometria: uma exploração conceitual dos mecanismos utilizados para medir o registro da informação e a difusão do conhecimento. Ci. Inf., 31(2), 152-162.