A Review of the Environmental Impacts of Biobased Materials

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages

  Weiss, Martin ^a   Haufe, Juliane ^a   Carus, Michael ^a   Brandão, Miguel ^a   Bringezu, Stefan ^a   Hermann, Barbara ^a   Patel, Martin K ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biomass; Environmental impact assessment; Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; Industrial ecology; Life cycle assessment; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

BIO-BASED MATERIALS; CONVENTIONAL MATERIALS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; GROWING MARKETS; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL FEEDSTOCK; LAND USE IMPACT; LAND-USE CHANGE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); META-ANALYSIS; NITROUS OXIDE; PHOTOCHEMICAL OZONE; POLICY MAKERS; POTENTIAL LOSS; PRIMARY ENERGIES; SOIL CARBON; SOIL EROSION; STRATOSPHERIC OZONE DEPLETION;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEFORESTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ETHYLENE; EUTROPHICATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRY; LIFE CYCLE; NITROGEN OXIDES; OZONE; SULFUR; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

MATERIALS;

ACIDIFICATION; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIOGENIC MATERIAL; BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; DEFORESTATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EUTROPHICATION; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; LAND USE CHANGE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LITERATURE REVIEW; META-ANALYSIS; OZONE DEPLETION; SOIL CARBON; STRATOSPHERE;

EID: 84860535394     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00468.x     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Amlinger, F., S. Peyr, and C. Cuhls 2008. Greenhouse gas emissions from composting and mechanical biological treatment. Waste Management & Research 26(1): 47-60.
2. Arima, E. Y., P. Richards, R. Walker, and M. M. Caldas 2011. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 6: 1-7.
3. Boustead, I. 2005a. Eco-profiles of the European plastics industry - High density polyethylene (HDPE). Brussels, Belgium : PlasticsEurope.
4. Boustead, I. 2005b. Eco-profiles of the European plastics industry - Low density polyethylene (LDPE). Brussels, Belgium : Plastics-Europe.
5. Boustead, I. 2005c. Eco-profiles of the European plastics industry - Polyethylene terephthalate (PET, amorphous grade). Brussels, Belgium : PlasticsEurope.
6. Boustead, I. 2005d. Eco-profiles of the European plastics industry - Polypropylene (PP). Brussels, Belgium : PlasticsEurope.
7. Brandão M. and A. Levasseur 2011. Assessing temporary carbon storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting: Outcomes of an expert workshop. ISBN 978-92-79-20350-3. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union.
8. Bringezu, S., M. O'Brien, and H. Schütz 2012. Beyond biofuels: Assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass. A conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources. Land Use Policy 29(1): 24-232.
9. Bringezu, S. and R. Bleischwitz (eds.). 2009. Sustainable resource management: Global trends, visions and policies. Sheffield, UK : Greenleaf Publishing.
10. Bringezu, S., H. Schütz, M. O'Brien, L. Kauppi, R. W. Howarth, and J. McNeely 2009. Towards sustainable production and consumption of resources: Assessing biofuels. Geneva, Switzerland : United Nations Environment Programme.
11. Bruinsma, J. 2009. The resource outlook to 2050: By how much do land, water, and crop yields need to increase by 2050? Paper presented at the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) expert meeting, 24-26 June, Rome, Italy
12. Cherubini, F. and G. Jungmeier 2010. LCA of a biorefinery concept producing bioethanol, bioenergy, and chemicals from switchgrass. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(1): 53-66.
13. Corbière-Nicollier, T., B. Gfeller-Laban, L., Lundquist, J.-A. E. Leterrier, Y., Månson, and O. Jolliet 2001. Life cycle assessment of bio fibres replacing glass fibres as re-inforcement in plastics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 33(4): 267-287.
14. 2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 7(4): 11191-11205.
15. Deimling, S., M. Goymann, M. Baitz, and T. Rehl 2007. Auswertung von Studien zur ökologischen Betrachtung von nachwachsenden Rohstoffen bei einer stofflichen Nutzung [Analyzing studies on the ecological evaluation of biomass use for materials] FKZ 114-50.10.0236/06-E. Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany : PE International.
16. Dinkel, F., C. Pohl, M. Ros, and B. Waldeck 1996. Ökobilanz stärkehaltiger Kunststoffe [Life cycle assessment of starch-based polymers] Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 271/I-II. Bern, Switzerland : Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL).
17. Dornburg, V., I. Lewandowski, and M. K. Patel 2003. Comparing the land requirements, energy savings, and greenhouse gas emissions reduction of bio-based polymers and bioenergy. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 7(3-4): 93-116.
18. Dreyer, L. C., A. L. Niemann, M. Z. Hauschild 2003. Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99. Does it matter which one you choose. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8(4): 191-200.
19. Edelmann, W. and K. Schleiss 2001. Ökologischer, energetischer und ökonomischer Vergleich von Vergärung, Kompostierung und Verbrennung fester biogener Abfallstoffe [Ecological, energetic, and economic comparison of fermentation, composting, and incineration of solid biogenic waste] Bern, Switzerland : Bundesamt für Energie (BFE) and Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL).
20. EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2011. International energy outlook 2011. DOE/EIA-0484. Washington, DC, USA : EIA.
21. Geyer, R., J. P. Lindner, D. M. Stoms, F. W. Davis, and B. Wittstock 2010a. Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use; Part 1: Inventory modeling. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(5): 454-467.
22. Geyer, R., J. P. Lindner, D. M. Stoms, F. W. Davis, and B. Wittstock 2010b. Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use; Part 2: Impact assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(7): 692-703.
23. Gironi, F. and V. Piemonte 2011. Bioplastics and petroleum-based plastics: Strengths and weaknesses. Energy Sources, Part A 33: 1949-1959.
24. Guinée, J. B. (ed.). 2001. LCA - An operational guide to the ISO standards, Part 1, 2, 3. Leiden, the Netherlands : Institute of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University.
25. Guinée, J. B., R. Heijungs, and E. van der Voet 2009. A greenhouse gas indicator for bioenergy: some theoretical issues with practical implications. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(4): 328-339.
26. Guo, M., A. P. Trzcinski, D. C. Stuckey, and R. J. Murphy 2011. Anaerobic digestion of starch-polyvinyl alcohol biopolymer packaging: Biodegradability and environmental impact assessment. Bioresource Technology 102(24): 11137-11146.
27. Harding, K. G., J. S. Dennis, H. von Blottnitz, and S. T. L. Harrison 2007. Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: Comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis. Journal of Biotechnology 130(1): 57-66.
28. Haufe, J. 2010. Energie- und Treibhausgas-Einsparungen durch die Nutzung nachwachsender Rohstoffe (Langfassung) [Energy and greenhouse gas emission savings from biomass use]. In Entwicklung von Förderinstrumenten für die stoffliche Nutzung von Nachwachsenden Rohstoffen in Deutschland - Volumen, Struktur, Substitutionspotenziale, Konkurrenzsituation und Besonderheiten der stofflichen Nutzung sowie Entwicklung von Förderinstrumenten [The development of instruments to support the material use of renewable raw materials in Germany], edited by M. Carus, A. Raschka, and S. Piotrowski Report-FKZ: 22003908. Hürth, Germany : Nova-Institut.
29. Heijungs, R., J. B. Guinée, G. Huppes, R. M. Lankreijer, H. A. Udo de Haes, A. Wegener, A. Sleeswijk, A. M. M. Ansems, P. G. Eggels, R. van Duin, H. P. de Goede 1992. Environmental life cycle assessment of products - background and guide. NL-2300 RA. Leiden, the Netherlands : Centre of Environmental Science (CML).
30. Hermann, B. G., K. Blok, and M. K. Patel 2010. Twisting bio-based materials around your little finger: Environmental impacts of bio-based wrappings. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(4) 346-458.
31. Hermann, B. G., L. Debeer, B. de Wilde, K. Blok, and M. K. Patel 2011. To compost or not to compost: LCA of biodegradable materials' waste treatment. Polymer Degradation and Stability 96(6): 1159-1171.
32. Hoefnagels, R., E. M. W. Smeets, and A. Faaij 2010. Greenhouse gas footprints of different production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(7): 1661-1694.
33. Hubert, B., M. Rosegrant, M. A. J. S. van Boekel, and R. Ortiz 2010. The future of food: Scenarios for 2050. Crop Science 50(2): 33-50.
34. IAI (International Aluminium Institute). 2010. Historic IAI statistics. London, UK : IAI. Accessed 3 August 2010.
35. IEA (International Energy Agency). 2009. Energy balances of non-OECD countries. Paris, France : IEA, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
36. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 4, Chapter 11. Geneva, Switzerland . Accessed 4 November 2010.
37. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006a. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. ISO 14040. Geneva, Switzerland : ISO.
38. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006b. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines. ISO/FDIS 14044. Geneva, Switzerland : ISO.
39. Kaenzig, J., G. Houillon, M. Rocher, H. Bewa, L. Bodineau, M. Orphelin, E. Poitrat, and O. Jolliet 2004. Comparison of the environmental impacts of bio-based products. Proceedings of the 2nd world conference and technology exhibition on biomass for energy, industry and climate protection, 10-14 May, Rome, Italy
40. Karpenstein-Machan, M. 2001. Sustainable cultivation concepts for domestic energy production from biomass. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 20(1): 1-14.
41. Kim, S., and B. E. Dale 2008. Energy and greenhouse gas profiles of polyhydroxybutyrates derived from corn grain: A life cycle perspective. Environmental Science & Technology 42(20): 7690-7695.
42. Khoo, H. H., R. B. H. Tan, and K. W. L. Chng 2010. Environmental impacts of conventional plastic and bio-based carrier bags - Part 1: Life cycle production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(3): 284-293.
43. Komatsuzaki, M. and H. Ohta 2007. Soil management practices for sustainable agro-ecosystems. Sustainability Science 2(1): 103-120.
44. Lapola, D. M., R. Schaldach, J. Alcamo, A. Bondeau, J. Kocha, K. Koelking, and J. A. Priess 2010. Indirect land use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(49): 3388-3393.
45. Larson, E. D. 2006. A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector. Energy for Sustainable Development 10(2): 109-126.
46. Lasserre, P. 2008. Global strategic management - The global cement industry. Accessed 3 August 2010.
47. Le Duigou, A., J.-M. Deux, P. Davies, and C. Baley 2011. PLLA/flax mat/balsa bio-sandwich - environmental impact and simplified life cycle analysis. Applied Composite Materials 18: 421-438.
48. Madival, S., R. Auras, S. P. Singh, and R. Narayan 2009. Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 1183-1194.
49. Miller, S. A., A. E. Landis, T. L. Theis, and R. A. Reich 2007. A comparative life cycle assessment of petroleum and soybean-based lubricants. Environmental Science and Technology 41(11): 4143-4149.
50. Müller-Sämann, K. M., G. A. Reinhardt, R. Vetter, and S. O. Gärtner 2002. Nachwachsende Rohstoffe in Baden-Württemberg. Identifizierung vorteilhafter Produktlinien zur stofflichen Nutzung unter Berücksichtigung umweltgerechter Anbauverfahren [Biomass resources in Baden-Württemberg: Identifying environmentally favorable bio-based products] Report FZKA-BWPLUS, BWA 20002. Mühlheim, Germany : Institut für umweltgerechte Landbewirtschaftung (IfuL) and Heidelberg: Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH (IFEU).
51. Nebel, B., B. Zimmer, and G. Wegener 2006. Life cycle assessment of wood floor coverings: A representative study for the German flooring industry. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(3): 172-182.
52. Nellemann, C., M. MacDevette, T. Manders, B. Eickhout, B. Svihus, A. Gerdien-Prins, and B. P. Kaltenborn 2009. The environmental food crisis: The environment's role in averting future food crises - A UNEP rapid response assessment. Nairobi, Kenya : United Nations Environment Programme.
53. OGJ. 2007. 2007 Worldwide refinery survey. Oil and Gas Journal. Tulsa : PennWell Corporation.
54. Ogle, S. M., S. J. Del Grosso, P. R. Adler and W. J. Parton 2008. Soil nitrous oxide emissions with crop production for biofuel: Implications for greenhouse gas mitigation. Oak Brook, IL, USA : Farm Foundation. Accessed 15 September 2011.
55. Oertel, D. 2007. Industrielle stoffliche Nutzung nachwachsender Rohstoffe. Sachstandsbericht zum Monitoring ''Nachwachsende Rohstoffe'' [The industrial use of biomass. Report on the monitoring of biogenic resources] Berlin, Germany : Arbeitsbericht. Accessed 13 April 2010.
56. Patel, M. K., C. Bastioli, L. Marini, and E. Würdinger 2003. Life-cycle assessment of bio-based polymers and natural fiber composites. In General aspects and special applications. Biopolymers, vol. 10, edited by A. Steinbüchel Weinheim, Germany : Wiley-VCH.
57. Patel, M. K., M. Crank, V. Dornburg, B. G. Hermann, L. Roes, B. Hüsing, L. Overbeek, F. Teraggni, and E. Recchia 2006. Medium- and long-term opportunities and risks of the biotechnological production of bulk chemicals from renewable resources - The potential of white biotechnology. The BREW Project - Final Report. Utrecht, the Netherlands : Utrecht University.
58. PlasticsEurope. 2007. Business data and charts 2006. Brussels, Belgium : PlasticsEurope Market Research Group (PEMRG).
59. Plevin, R. J., M. O'Hare, A. D. Jones, M. S. Torn, and H. K. Gibbs 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environmental Science and Technology 44(21): 8015-8021.
60. Piemonte, V. and F. Gironi 2011. Land use change emissions: How green are the bioplastics? Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 30(4): 685-691.
61. 2-neutral pathways towards future mobility: The current situation of biofuels] Heidelberg, Germany : Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH (IFEU). Accessed 2 May 2010.
62. 2O): The dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 326(5949): 123-125.
63. Reinhardt, G. A., R. Herbener, and S. O. Gärtner 2001. Life-cycle analysis of lubricants from rape seed oil in comparison to conventional lubricants. Heidelberg, Germany : Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg (IFEU). Accessed 2 May 2010.
64. Reinhardt, G. A., A. Patyk, J. Calzoni, N. Caspersen, N. Dercas, G. Gaillard, G. Gosse, M. Hanegraaf, L. Heinzer, N. Jungk, A. Kool, G. Korsuize, M. Lechner, B. Leviel, R. Neumayr, A. M. Nielsen, P. H. Nielsen, A. Nikolaou, C. Panoutsou, A. Panvini, J. Rathbauer, G. Riva, E. Smedile, C. Stettler, B. Pedersen Weidema, M. Wrgetter, H. van Zeijts 2000. Bioenergy for Europe: Which one fits best?- A comparative analysis for the community. Final Report FAIR V CT 98 3832. Heidelberg, Germany : Institut für Energie und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH.
65. Rothermel, J. 2008. Raw material change in the chemical industry - The general picture. HLG Chemicals - Working Group Feedstock, Energy & Logistics. Presentation given on 7 February 2008 in Brussels, Belgium, for the German Chemical Industry Association (VCI).
66. Saygin, D. and M. K. Patel 2010. Renewables for industry: An overview of the opportunities for biomass use. Prepared for the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Energy and Climate Change Branch. Utrecht, the Netherlands : Utrecht University.
67. Scheer, C., R. Wassmann, K. Kienzler, N. Ibragimov, and R. Eschanov 2008.Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized, irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in the Aral Sea Basin, Uzbekistan: Influence of nitrogen applications and irrigation practices. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40(2): 290-301.
68. Schmitz, N., J. Henke, and G. Klepper 2009. Biokraftstoffe - Eine vergleichende Analyse [Biofuels - A comparative analysis] Gülzow, Germany : Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe.
69. Searchinger, T., R. Heimlich, R. A. Houghton, F. Dong, A. Elobeid, J. Fabiosa, S. Tokgoz, D. Hayes, and T.-H. Yu 2010. Use of U.S. cropland for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science 319(5867): 1238-1240.
70. Sehy, U., R. Ruser, and J. C. Munch 2003. Nitrous oxide fluxes from maize fields: Relationship to yield, site-specific fertilization, and soil conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 99(1-3): 97-111.
71. Shen, L., J. Haufe, and M. K. Patel 2009a. Product overview and market projection of emerging bio-based plastics. PRO-BIP 2009. Utrecht, the Netherlands : Utrecht University.
72. Shen, L. and M. K. Patel 2010. Life cycle assessment of man-made cellulose fibres. Lenzinger Berichte 88: 1-59.
73. Shen, L. and M. K. Patel 2008. Life cycle assessment of polysaccharide materials: A review. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 16(2): 154-167.
74. Shen, L., E. Worrell, and M. K. Patel 2009b. Present and future development in plastics from biomass. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining 4(1): 25-40.
75. Sleeswijk, A. W., L. F. C. M. van Oers, J. B. Guinée, J. Struijs, and M. A. J. Huijbregts 2008. Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: An LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. Science of the Total Environment 390(1): 227-240.
76. 2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first-generation biofuels. Global Change Biology 15(1): 1-23.
77. Turunen, L. and H. M. G. van der Werf 2006. Life cycle assessment of hemp textile yarn - Comparison of three hemp fiber processing scenarios and a flax scenario. Paris, France : Institut National de la Recherche Acronomique.
78. UBA (German Federal Environment Agency). 1995. Methodik der produktbezogenen Ökobilanzen - Wirkungsbilanz und Bewertung [Methods for life cycle assessment - impact assessment] UBA-Texte 23/95. Berlin, Germany : UBA.
79. UN (United Nations). 2008. Industry commodity production data 1950-2005. CD-ROM. New York, NY, USA : UN Statistics Division.
80. UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme). 2000. The Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Nairobi, Kenya : UNEP.
81. Vink, E. T. H., S. Davies, and J. J. Kolstad 2010. The eco-profile for current Ingeo® polylactide production. Industrial Biotechnology 6(4): 212-224.
82. Vink, E. T. H., D. A. Glassner, J. J. Kolstad, R. J. Wooley, and R. P. O'Connor 2007. The eco-profiles for current and near-future NatureWorks® polylactide (PLA) production. Industrial Biotechnology 3(1): 58-81.
83. von Blottnitz, H., and M. A. Curran 2007. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 15(7): 607-619.
84. WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung für Globale Umweltveränderungen). 2008. Welt im Wandel: Zukunftsfähige Bioenergie und nachhaltige Landnutzung [A changing world: Sustainable bioenergy and land use] Berlin, Germany : WBGU.
85. Weiss, M. and M. K. Patel 2007. On the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels, and materials: A comparative analysis of life cycle assessment studies. In Renewable resources and renewable energy: A global challenge, edited by M. Graziani and P. Fornasiero New York, NY, USA : Taylor & Francis.
86. Weiss, M., M. K. Patel, H. Heilmeier, and S. Bringezu 2007. Applying distance-to-target weighing methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels, and materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 50(3): 260-281.
87. Williams, P. R. D., D. Inman, A. Aden, and G. A. Heath 2009. Environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: What do we really know? Environmental Science and Technology 43(13): 4763-4775.
88. Wicke, B., V. Dornburg, H. M. Junginger, and A. Faaij 2008. Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(12): 1322-1337.
89. Wötzel, K., R. Wirth, and M. Flake 1999. Life cycle studies on hemp fiber reinforced components and ABS for automotive sections. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 272(1): 121-127.
90. Würdinger, E., U. Roth, A. Wegener, R. Peche, W. Rommel, S. Kreibe, A. Nikolakis, et al. 2002. Kunststoffe aus nachwachsenden Rohstoffen: Vergleichende Ökobilanz für Loose-fill-Packmittel aus Stärke bzw. Polystyrol [Polymers from starch: A comparative life cycle assessment for loose-fill packaging materials from starch and polystyrene] Projektgemeinschaft BIfA /IFEU /Flo-Pak. DBU-Az. 04763. Heidelberg, Germany : Institut für Energie und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH.
91. Zah, R., R. Hischier, A. L., Leão, and I. Braun 2007. Curauá fibers in the automobile industry - A sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 15(11-12): 1032-1040.