Comparing the land requirements, energy savings, and greenhouse gas emissions reduction of biobased polymers and bioenergy: An analysis and system extension of life-cycle assessment studies

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 7, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 93-116

  Dornburg, Veronika ^a   Lewandowski, Iris ^a   Patel, Martin ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Biomass; Biopolymer; Land use; Plastics; Renewable fuels

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; BIOPOLYMERS; ECOLOGY; THERMOPLASTICS;

BIOBASED POLYMERS; ENERGY SAVING; GREENHOUSE GASES (GHG); LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA);

GREENHOUSES;

EID: 2342473916     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/108819803323059424     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. APME (Association of Polymers Manufacturers in Europe). 1999. Eco-profiles of polymers and related intermediates. 〈www.apme.org〉. Accessed June 2003.
2. Atherton, B. G., M. F. Ruth, J. L. Lechura, and K. N. Ibsen. 2002. Overall energy balance for the corn stover to ethanol process. Paper presented at the 24th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, 28 April-1 May, Gatlinburg, TN.
3. Corbière-Nicollier, T., B. Afeller Laban, L. Lundquist, Y. Leterrier, J.-A. E. Månson, and O. Jolliet. 2001. Life cycle assessment of biofibres replacing glass fibres as reinforcement in polymers. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling 33(4): 267-287.
4. Dale, B. E. 2002. Integrated biorefining systems: A sustainable future seen through a glass, darkly. Paper presented at 2002 Fall Annual Meeting, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 3-8 November, Indianapolis, IN.
5. Diener, J. and U. Siehler. 1999. Ökologischer Vergleich von NMT- und GMT-Bauteilen. [Ecological comparison of a natural fibre-reinforced poly(propylene) under-floor panel (NMT) of a passenger car with a glass-fibre reinforced panel (GMT).] Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 272: 1-4.
6. Dinkel, F., C. Pohl, M. Ros, and B. Waldeck. 1996. Ökobilanz stärkehaltiger Kunststoffe. [Life-cycle assessment of starch-containing polymers.] Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 271. Bern: BUWAL (Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft [Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests, and Landscape]).
7. EC (European Commission). 1999. Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. Official Journal L 182, 16/07/1999 P. Brussels: EC.
8. Estermann, R., B. Schwarzwälder, and B. Gysin. 2000. Life cycle assessment of Mater-Bi and EPS loose fills. Olten, Switzerland: Composto.
9. Faaij, A., C. Hamelinck, and M. Tijmensen. 2000. Long term perspectives for production of fuels from biomass: Integrated assessment and R&D priorities - Preliminary results. In Proceedings of the first world conference on biomass for energy and industry. Vol. 1. pp. 687-690. London: James and James.
10. Faaij, A., B. Meuleman, and R. van Ree. 1998. Long term perspectives of BIG/CC technology. Utrecht: Novem (Netherlands Agency for Energy and the Environment).
11. Gärtner, S. O., K. Müller-Sämann, G. A. Reinhardt, and R. Vetter. 2002. Corn to polymers: A comprehensive environmental assessment. In Proceedings of the 12th European biomass conference. Vol. 2; pp. 1324-1326. London: James and James.
12. Gerngross, T. U. and S. Slater. 2000. How green are green polymers? Scientific American 282(8): 37-41.
13. Goldemberg, J., ed. 2000. World energy assessment. New York: UNDP.
14. Gruber, P. R. 2003. Cargill Dow LLC. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(3-4): 209-213.
15. Heyde, M. 1998. Ecological considerations on the use and production of biosynthetic and synthetic biodegradable polymers. Polymer Degradation Stability 59: 3-6.
16. Hoogwijk, M., A. Faaij, R. van den Broek, G. Berndes, D. Gielen, and W. Turkenburg. 2003. Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass and Bioenergy 25: 119-133.
17. Hydro Agri Dülmen. 1993. Faustzahlen für Landwirtschaft und Gartenbau. [Standard figures for agriculture and horticulture.] Münster: Verlagsunion Agrar.
18. Kaltschmitt, M. and H. Hartmann. 2001. Energie aus Biomasse - Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren. [Energy from biomass - Fundamental principles, technology, and processes.] Berlin: Springer.
19. Kaltschmitt, M. and G. Reinhardt. 1997. Nachwachsende Energieträger: Grundlagen, Verfahren, ökologische Bilanzierung. [Biomass for energy: Fundamental principles, processes, and environmental impact assessments.] Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.
20. Kim, S. and B. Dale. 2003. Cumulative energy and global warming impact from production of biomass for biobased products. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(3-4): 147-162.
21. Kuhn, E. 1995. Kofermentation: Arbeitspapier 219. [Co-digestion: Working paper 219.] Darmstadt: KTBL (Association for Technology and Structures in Agriculture).
22. Kurdikar, D., M. Paster, K. J. Gruys, L. Fournet, T. U. Gerngross, S. C. Slater, and R. Coulon. 2001. Greenhouse gas profile of a polymer derived from a genetically modified plant. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(3): 107-122.
23. Lewandowski, I., J. C. Clifton-Brown, J. M. Scurlock, and W. Huisman. 2000. Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass and Bioenergy 19: 209-227.
24. Linden, D. R., C. E. Clapp, and R. H. Dowdy. 2000. Long-term corn grain and stover yields as a function of tillage and residue removal in east central Minnesota. Soil and Tillage Research 56: 167-174.
25. LWK (Landwirschaftskammer Westfalen-Lippe [Agricultural professional organization Westfalen-Lippe]). 2002. Grunddüngung mit Phosphat, Kali, Magnesium. [Soil fertilization with phosphate, potassium and magnesium.] 〈www.lk-wl.de/rlp/landbau/duenger/gr_naehr/gr_dueng.htm〉. AccessedOctober2002.
26. Nossin, P., J. Joosten, and A. Bruggink. 2002. Future feedstock for commodity polymers: Ecothene TM sustainability in the 21st century. Heerlen, The Netherlands: DSM Research BV.
27. Nova-Institut. 1996. Das Hanfproduktlinienprojekt (HPLP) - Erarbeitung von Produktlinien auf Basis von einheimischem Hanf: aus technischer, ökonomischer und ökologischer Sicht. [The hemp product chain project (HPLP): Elaboration of local hemp product trees from a technological, economic and ecological point of view.] Hürth, Germany: Nova-Institut.
28. Patel, M., C. Bastioli, L. Marini, and E. Würdinger. 2003. Environmental assessment of bio-based polymers and natural fibres. In General aspects and special applications. Biopolymers, Vol. 10, edited by A. Steinbüchel. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley.
29. 2 flows of life-cycle model systems in the context of non-energetic consumption - Status and scenario investigation.] Part 1. Karslruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI.
30. PAV (Praktijkonderzoek voor de Akkerbouw en de Vollegronds groenteteelt [Practice research for agriculture and vegetable growing]). 2000. Kwantitatieve Informatie Akkerbouw en Vollegrondsgroenteteelt 2000/2001. [Quantitative information on agriculture and vegetable growing 2000/2001.] Lelystad, The Netherlands: PAV.
31. Peereboom, E. C., R. Kleijn, S. Lemkowitz, and S. Lundie. 1998. Influence of inventory data sets on life-cycle assessment results: A case study on PVC. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(3): 109-130.
32. Pervaiz, M. and M. M. Sain. 2003. Carbon storage potential in natural fiber composites. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling 39(4): 325-340.
33. Phylipsen, D., M. Kerssemeeckers, K. Blok, M. Patel, and J. de Beer. 2002. Clean technologies in the materials sector: Current and future environmental performance of material technologies. Report E 9087. Utrecht: Ecofys.
34. Rösch, C. and D. Wintzer. 1997. Monitoring "Nachwachsende Rohstoffe": Vergasung und Pyrolyse von Biomasse - Zweiter Sachstandsbericht. [Monitoring "renewable resources": Gasification and pyrolysis of biomass - Second report on the state of the art.] Bonn: Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag [Office of Technology Assessment at the German Parliament].
35. Scheer-Triebel, M., K.-U. Heyland, and J. Leon. 2000. Einfluss des Ernte termins auf Morphologie, Ertrag und Qualität verschiedener Leingenotypen. [The influence of the harvest date on morphology, yields, and quality of different flax genotypes.] Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 4(2): 91-102.
36. Shapouri, H., J. A. Duffield, and M. Wang. 2002. The energy balance of corn ethanol: An update. Agricultural economic report 813. Washington, DC: USDA.
37. Sheehan, J., A. Aden, C. Riley, K. Paustian, J. Brenner, K. Killian, J. Cushman, M. Walsh, and R. Nelson. 2002. Is biomass part of a sustainable energy future? Adventures in cyber-farming. Paper presented at 2002 Fall Annual Meeting, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 3-8 November, Indianapolis, IN.
38. UBA (Umweltbundesamt [German Federal Environmental Agency]). 2002. Basisdaten Umweltmanagement. [Basic figures environmental management.] 〈www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-infodaten/daten/baum/index.htm〈. Accessed November 2002.
39. Van den Broek, R., D.-J. Treffers, M. Meeusen, A. van Wijk, E. Nieuwlarr, and W. Turkenburg. 2001. Green energy or organic food? A life-cycle assessment comparing two uses of set-aside land. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5(3): 65-87.
40. Vink, E. T. H., K. R. Rábago, D. A. Glassner, and P. R. Gruber. 2003. Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks(™) polylactide (PLA) production. Polymer Degradation and Stability 80(3): 403-419.
41. Wötzel, K., R. Wirth, and R. Flake. 1999. Life cycle studies on hemp fibre reinforced components and ABS for automotive parts. Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 272: 121-127.
42. Würdinger, E., U. Roth, A. Wegener, R. Peche, J. Borken, A. Detzel, H. Fehrenbach, J. Giegrich, S. Möhler, A. Patyk, G. A. Reinhardt, R. Vogt, D. Mühlberger, and J. Wante. 2002. Kunststoffe aus nachwachsenden Rohstoffen: Vergleichende Ökobilanz für Loose-fill-Packmittel aus Stärke bzw. aus Polystyrol. [Biobased polymers: Comparative life-cycle assessment of loose-fill-packaging from starch and poly(styrene).] Endbericht (DBU-Az. 04763). Augsburg: Bayrisches Institut für angewandte Umweltforschung und-technik [Bavarian Institute of Applied Environmental Research and Technology].