Exploring Responsibility Rationales in Research and Development (R&D)

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 180-209

  Doorn, Neelke ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

collective cooperation; ethics; expertise; methodologies; Rawls; responsibility distribution; Wide Reflective Equilibrium

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860516475     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243911405344     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bovens M.The Quest for Responsibility. Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
2. Brand-Ballard J."Consistency, Common Morality, and Reflective Equilibrium".Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2003;13:231-58.
3. Cohen S. J."Scientist-Stakeholder Collaboration in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: Lessons From a Case-Study of Northwest Canada".Environmental Modelling and Assessment. 1997;2:281-93.
4. Daboub A. J.,Calton J. M."Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks".Journal of Business Ethics. 2002;41:85-98.
5. Dancy J.Ethics Without Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004:.
6. Daniels N."Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics".Journal of Philosophy. 1979;76:256-82.
7. Daniels N.Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
8. Doorn N."A Rawlsian Approach to Distribute Responsibilities in Networks".Science and Engineering Ethics. 2010;16:221-49.
9. Doorn N."Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives".Science and Engineering Ethics. 2011;:.
10. Doorn N."Responsibilities Within an Ambient Assisted Living Healthcare Project.". IN PRESS:.
11. Dowding K."Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach".Political Studies. 1995;43:136-58.
12. Dryzek J. S.The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997:.
13. Dryzek J. S.,Niemeyer S."Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals".American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50:634-49.
14. Einsiedel E. F.,Jelsoe E.,Breck T."Publics at the Technology Table: The Consensus Conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia".Public Understanding of Science. 2001;10:83-98.
15. Forsyth D. R."A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980;39:175-84.
16. Forsyth D. R."Individual Differences in Information Integration During Moral Judgment".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985;49:264-72.
17. Forsyth D. R."Judging the Morality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies".Journal of Business Ethics. 1992;11:461-70.
18. Forsyth D. R.,Bye J. L.,Kelley K. N."Idealism, Relativism, and the Ethic of Caring".Journal of Psychology. 1988;122:243-8.
19. Forsyth D. R.,O'Boyle E. H.,McDaniel M. A."East Meets West: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Cultural Variations in Idealism and Relativism".Journal of Business Ethics. 2008;83:813-33.
20. Glenna L. L."Value-Laden Technocratic Management and Environmental Conflicts: The Case of the New York City Watershed Controversy".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2010;35:81-112.
21. Gracia D."Hard Times, Hard Choices: Founding Bioethics Today".Bioethics. 1995;9:192-206.
22. Grin J.,Hoppe R."Toward a Comparative Framework for Learning From Experiences With Interactive Technology Assessment".Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly. 1995;9:99-120.
23. Grin J.,van der Graaf H."Technology Assessment as Learning".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1996a;21:72-99.
24. Grin J.,van der Graaf H."Implementation as Communicative Action: An Interpretative Understanding of Interactions Between Policy Actors and Target Groups".Policy Sciences. 1996b;29:291-319.
25. Hanson C. E.,Palutikof J. P.,Dlugolecki A.,Giannakopoulos C."Bridging the Gap Between Science and the Stakeholder: The Case of Climate Change Research".Climate Research. 2006;31:121-33.
26. Hart H. L. A.The Concept of Law. Oxford: The Clarendon Press; 1961:.
27. Henneberg S. C.,Mouzas S.,Naudé P."Network Pictures: Concepts and Representation".European Journal of Marketing. 2006;40:408-29.
28. Hooker B.,Little M.Moral Particularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
29. Joss S.,Bellucci S.Participatory Technology Assessment. Gateshead, Tyne, and Wear: European Perspectives, Athenaeum Press; 2002:.
30. Joss S.,Durant J.Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Trustees of the Science Museum; 1995:.
31. Kensing F.Methods and Practices in Participatory Design. Copenhagen: ITU Press; 2003:.
32. Knoke D.Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
33. Laird F. N."Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision-Making".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1993;18:341-61.
34. McCarthy T."Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue".Ethics. 1994;105:44-63.
35. Möller K."Sense-Making and Agenda Construction in Emerging Business Networks: How to Direct Radical Innovation".Industrial Marketing Management. 2010;39:361-71.
36. Perhac R. M."Comparative Risk Assessment: Where Does the Public Fit in?".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1998;23:221-41.
37. Rawls J.A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971:.
38. Rawls J.Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2001:.
39. Reuzel R. P. B.,Van der Wilt G. J.,Ten Have H. A. M. J.,Robbe P. E. D."Interactive Technology Assessment and Wide Reflective Equilibrium".Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2001;26:245-61.
40. Rip A.,Misa T. J.,Schot J.Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Cassell; 1995:.
41. Rowe G.,Frewer L. J."Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2004;29:512-57.
42. Saari E.,Miettinen R."Dynamics of Change in Research Work: Constructing a New Research Area in a Research Group".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2001;26:300-21.
43. Schinzinger R."Ethics on the Feedback Loop".Control Engineering Practice. 1998;6:239-45.
44. Schot J. W."Towards New Forms of Participatory Technology Development".Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2001;13:39-52.
45. Schot J. W.,Rip A."The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment".Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 1997;54:251-68.
46. Schuler D.,Namioka A.Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1993:.
47. Sclove R. E.Democracy and Technology. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 1995:.
48. Swierstra T. E.,Jelsma J."Responsibility Without Moralism in Techno-Scientific Design Practice".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2006;31:309-32.
49. Thompson D. F."Moral Responsibility and Public Officials".American Political Science Review. 1980;74:905-16.
50. Van Asselt M. B. A.,Rijkens-Klomp N."A Look in the Mirror: Reflection on Participation in Integrated Assessment From a Methodological Perspective".Global Environmental Change. 2002;12:167-84.
51. Van de Poel I. R.,Royakkers L. M. M."The Ethical Cycle".Journal of Business Ethics. 2007;71:1-13.
52. Van de Poel I. R.,Zwart S. D."Reflective Equilibrium in R&D Networks".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2010;35:174-99.
53. Van den Hoven M. J.Public Administration in an Information Age. A Handbook. Snellen I. T. M.Van de Donk W. B. H. J., ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1998:97-111.
54. Van der Burg S."Imagining the Future of Photoacoustic Mammography".Science and Engineering Ethics. 2009;15:97-110.