The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Renkawitz, Tobias ^a   Haimerl, Martin ^b   Dohmen, Lars ^b   Gneiting, Sabine ^b   Lechler, Philipp ^a   Woerner, Michael ^a   Springorum, Hans Robert ^a   Weber, Markus ^a   Sussmann, Patrick ^a   Sendtner, Ernst ^a   Grifka, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b BRAINLAB AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; FEMALE; FEMORAL TILT; HUMAN; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RANGE OF MOTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE ANTEVERSION; CEMENTATION; DISLOCATIONS; FEMALE; FEMORACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84860510650     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-65     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Impingement with total hip replacement. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 1832 1842 10.2106/JBJS.F.01313 17671025
2. Factors presdisposing to dislocation after primary total hip prosthesis. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF, J Arthroplasty 2002 17 282 288 10.1054/arth.2002.30286 11938502
3. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. Nadzadi ME, Pedersen DR, Yack HJ, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD, J Biomech 2003 36 577 591 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00232-4 12600348
4. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. Barrack RL, J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003 11 89 12670135
5. Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Widmer KH, Int Orthop 2007 31 Suppl 1 29 S33 17661036
6. Modern Techniques of Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ, Tech Orthopedics 1991 6 17 25 10.1097/00013611-199109000-00004
7. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009 1 119 127
8. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B, J Orthop Res 2004 22 815 821 10.1016/j.orthres. 2003.11.001 15183439
9. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. Wines AP, McNicol D, J Arthroplasty 2006 21 696 701 10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.008 16877155
10. Stem torsion in total hip replacement. Sendtner E, Schuster T, Winkler R, Wörner M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T, Acta Orthop 2010 5 579 582
11. MicroHip: a minimally invasive procedure for total hip replacement surgery using a modified Smith-Peterson approach. Michel MC, Witschger P, Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007 1 46 51
12. Femoral anteversion: an assessment based on functional axes. Yoshioka K, Siu D, Cooke T, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987 69 873 880 3597501
13. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. Murray DW, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993 75 228 232 8444942
14. Proximal femoral tilt and its effect on range-of-motion. Haimerl M, Gneiting S, Dohmen L, Herzog A, Kramer S, Woerner M, Sendtner E, Renkawitz T, Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery: 17-19 June 2010; Paris Pro Business, Berlin, Davies B, Joskowicz L, Merloz P, 2010 300 303
15. The association between the sagittal femoral stem alignment and the resulting femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty. Mueller M, Crucius D, Perka C, Tohtz S, Int Orthop 2011 35 7 981 987 10.1007/s00264-010-1047-z 20549502
16. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. DLima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000 3 315 321
17. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Widmer KH, Majewski M, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005 7 723 728
18. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. Yoshimine F, J Biomech 2006 39 1315 1323 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005. 03.008 15894324
19. Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery. Renkawitz T, Tingart M, Grifka J, Sendtner E, Kalteis T, Expert Rev Med Devices 2009 5 507 514