Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: Coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 507-514

  Renkawitz, Tobias ^a   Tingart, Markus ^a   Grifka, Joachim ^a   Sendtner, Ernst ^a   Kalteis, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b Orthopaedic Surgery Munich (OSM)   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Hip arthroplasty; Minimally invasive; Total hip replacement; Total joint replacement

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LEG LENGTH; OPERATION DURATION; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATIENT SAFETY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HIP PROSTHESIS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70449348244     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/erd.09.34     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Woolf AD. The bone and joint decade 2000-2010. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 59, 81-82 (2000).
2. Bozic KJ, Saleh KJ, Lavernia CJ et al. Economics of total hip arthroplasty. In: The Adult Hip (Volume 2). Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE (Eds). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PA, USA, 829 (2007).
3. Kelly MP, Bozic KJ. Cost drivers in total hip arthroplasty: effects of procedure volume and implant selling price. Am. J. Orthop. 38(1), E1-E4 (2009).
4. Padgett DE, Warashina H. The unstable total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 420, 72-79 (2004).
5. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370, 1508-1519 (2007). • Overview of the history and principles of total hip arthroplasty (THA). (Pubitemid 47625538)
6. Kelley TC, Swank ML. Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 91(Suppl. 1), 153-158 (2009).
7. Zheng G, Marx A, Langlotz U, Widmer KH, Buttaro M, Nolte LP. A hybrid CT-free navigation system for total hip arthroplasty. Comput. Aid. Surg. 3, 129-145 (2002).
8. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M et al. The Otto Aufranc award. Image-guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 355, 8-22 (1998). • One of the first scientific publications presenting computer-assisted navigation for acetabular component placement in THA, highlighting the problem of free-hand cup positioning.
9. Krych A, Pagnano M. CAOS: greater precision, doubtful clinical benefit-affirms. Semin Arthroplasty 1, 58-59 (2009).
10. Miki H, Yamanashi W, Nishii T, Sato Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system. J. Arthro. 22, 946-953 (2007). (Pubitemid 47498917)
11. DeWal H, Su E, DiCesare PE. Instability following total hip arthroplasty. Am. J. Orthop. 32, 377-382 (2003).
12. Patil S, Bergula A, Chen PC, Colwell CW, D'Lima D. Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 85, 56-63 (2003). • Correct cup orientation in THA is necessary to avoid excessive wear of bearing components. (Pubitemid 37377427)
13. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J. Arthro. 17, 282-288 (2002). • The relative influence of various mechanical and patient-related factors on the incidence of dislocation after THA. (Pubitemid 34290000)
14. Harris WH. Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 146, 188-204 (1980).
15. Harkess WJ. Arthroplasty of the hip: dislocation and subluxation. In Campbell's Orthopaedics (Volume 8). Crenshaw AH (Ed.). Mosby, MO, USA, 54 (1992).
16. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 60, 217-220 (1978). • Principles of a 'safe zone' in acetabular cup position, based on the correlation between radiological cup position and instability in THA. Despite serious limitations of the safe zone concept, this paper is cited very often.
17. Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning - a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int. Orthop. 28, 198-201 (2004). (Pubitemid 39150312)
18. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J. Arthro. 17, 359-364 (2002). (Pubitemid 34290013)
19. Berry D. "Minimally invasive" total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87, 699-700 (2005). (Pubitemid 40489342)
20. Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM 3rd, Blackwell M, Nikou C. Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 354, 70-81 (1998).
21. Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P. Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 426, 174-179 (2004). (Pubitemid 39167126)
22. Paratte S, Argenson JN. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning systemin total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89, 494-499 (2007).
23. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J. Imageless navigation for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty - is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 88, 163-167 (2006). (Pubitemid 43279924)
24. Archbold HAP, Mockford B, Molloy D, McConway J, Ogonda L, Beverland D. The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 88, 883-886 (2006). • Novel alternative acetabular registration technique using the the transverse acetabular ligament.
25. Austin MS, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthro. 18(3), 88-90 (2003).
26. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J. Arthro. 17(Suppl. 1), 17-22 (2002)
27. Maloney WJ, Keeney JA. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthro. 19(Suppl. 1), 108-110 (2004).
28. Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ. Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. A85, 2310-2317 (2003). (Pubitemid 37499639)
29. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. B77, 865-869 (1995).
30. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 388, 125-134 (2001). (Pubitemid 32595015)
31. Sarin VK, Pratt WR, Bradley GW. Accurate femur repositioning is critical during intraoperative total hip arthroplasty length and offset assessment. J. Arthro. 20, 887-891 (2005).
32. Ranawat CS, Rao RR, Rodriguez JA, Bhende HS. Correction of limb-length inequality during total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthro. 16, 715-720 (2001).
33. Wixson R, McDonald M. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using image-less computer-assisted hip navigation. J. Arthro. 20, 51-56 (2005). (Pubitemid 41425786)
34. Murphy S, Ecker T. Evaluation of a new leg length measurement algorithm in hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 463, 85-89 (2007). (Pubitemid 47585256)
35. Renkawitz T, Sendtner E, Grifka J, Kalteis T. Accuracy of imageless stem navigation during simulated total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 6, 785-788 (2008).
36. Renkawitz T, Schuster T, Sendtner E et al. Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate? Int. J. Med. Robot. 5, 192-197 (2009).
37. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 3, 315-321 (2000).
38. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J. Orthop. Res. 4, 815-821 (2004). •• Biomathematical model to determine the optimal combination of cup inclination, cup anteversion and stem antetorsion for maximizing range of motion and minimizing the risk for cup-neck impingement after THA. (Pubitemid 38756262)
39. Wines AP, McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthro. 5, 696-701 (2006). (Pubitemid 44108578)
40. Jolles BM, Zangger P. Leyvraz PF. Factors presdisposing to dislocation after primary total hip prosthesis. J. Arthro. 17, 282-288 (2002).
41. Ranawat CS. Maynard MJ. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech. Orthop. 6, 17-25 (1991).
42. Widmer KH. Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 31(Suppl. 1), S29-S33 (2007). •• Principles of the 'femur-first' concept.
43. Komeno M, Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A. Computed tomographic evaluation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 29, 1104-1108 (2006). (Pubitemid 46138664)
44. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 8, 1832-1842 (2007). •• Latest developments and techniques for avoiding impingement in THA.
45. Leenders T, Vandevelde D, Mahieu G, Nuyts R. Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput. Aid. Surg. 2, 99-106 (2002). (Pubitemid 34773624)
46. Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z et al.: Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 465, 92-99 (2007). (Pubitemid 350306498)
47. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herbst B, Grifka J, Renkawitz T. In vitro investigation of the influence of pelvic tilt on acetabular cup alignment. J. Arthro. 1, 152-157 (2009.)
48. Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int. 3, 212-219 (2008).
49. Mabilleau G, Kwon YM, Pandit H, Murray DW, Sabokbar A. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of periprosthetic biological reactions. Acta Orthop. 6, 734-747 (2008).
50. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Coleman-Wood K, Kaufman KR, Berry DJ. Variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467, 43-49 (2009).