Comparing results of systematic reviews: Parallel reviews of research on repeated reading

Education and Treatment of Children

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 333-366

  O'Keeffe, Breda V ^a   Slocum, Timothy A ^b   Burlingame, Cheryl ^c   Snyder, Katie ^b   Bundock, Kaitlin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860480803     PISSN: 07488491     EISSN: 19348924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/etc.2012.0006     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Baker, S. K., Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Apichatabutra, C., & Doabler, C. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75, 303-318.
2. Bellini, S., & Akullian, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, 264-287.
3. Briggs, D. C. (2008). Synthesizing causal inferences. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 15-22.
4. Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392-408.
5. Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513-521.
6. Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Baker, S. K., Doabler, C., & Apichatabutra, C. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Exception Children, 75, 263-281.
7. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
8. Cohen, A. L. (1988). An evaluation of the effectiveness of two methods for providing computer-assisted repeated reading training to reading disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
9. Cohen, A. L., Torgesen, J. K., & Torgesen, J. L. (1988). Improving speed and accuracy of word recognition in reading disabled children: An evaluation of two computer program variations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 333-341.
10. Confrey, J. (2006). Comparing and contrasting the National Research Council Report On Evaluating Curricular Effectiveness with the What Works Clearinghouse approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 195-213.
11. Conte, R., & Humphreys, R. (1989). Repeated readings using audiotaped material enhances oral reading in children with reading difficulties. Journal of Communications Disorders, 22, 65-79.
12. Detrich, R. (2008, September). Evidence-based education: Can we get there from here? Presentation at the Association for Behavior Analysis International Education Conference, Reston, VA.
13. Detrich, R., Keyworth, R., States, J. (2007). A roadmap to evidencebased education: Building an evidence-based culture. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 8, 26-44.
14. Deutsch-Smith, D. (1979). The improvement of children's oral reading through the use of teacher modeling. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 172-175.
15. Drake, R. E., Latimer, E. A., Leff, H. S., McHugo, G. J., & Burns, B. J. (2004). What is evidence? Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 717-728.
16. Dowhower, S. L. (1989). Repeated reading: Research into practice. The Reading Teacher, 42, 502-507.
17. Eldredge, J. L., Reutzel, D. R., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1996). Comparing the effectiveness of two oral reading practices: Roundrobin reading and the shared book experience. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 201-225.
18. Faulkner, H. J., & Levy, B. A. (1999). Fluent and nonfluent forms of transfer in reading: Words and their message. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 111-116.
19. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1996). Bridging the research-to-practice gap with mainstream assistance teams: A cautionary tale. School Psychology Quarterly, 11(3), 244-266.
20. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
21. Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466-476.
22. Gottfredson, G. D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). What schools do to prevent problem behavior and promote safe environments. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 313-344.
23. Green, J. L., & Skukauskaite, A. (2008). Becoming critical readers: Issues in transparency, representation, and warranting of claims. Educational Researcher, 37 (1), 30-40.
24. Greenwood, C. R., & Abbott, M. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276-289.
25. Hollingsworth, P. M. (1970). An experiment with the impress method of teaching reading. Reading Teacher, 24, 112-114, 187.
26. Hollingsworth, P. M. (1978). An experimental approach to the impress method of teaching reading. Reading Teacher, 31, 624-626.
27. Homan, S. P., Klesius, J. P., & Hite, C. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students' fluency and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 94-99.
28. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidencebased practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
29. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
30. Jitendra, A. K., Burgess, C., & Gajria, M. (2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children,77, 135-159.
31. Kazdin, A. E. (2004). Evidence-based treatments: challenges and priorities for practice and research. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 923-940.
32. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
33. Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 341-389.
34. Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Dion, G. (2007). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2007 (NCES Report 2007-494). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.
35. Levy, B. A., Abello, B., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 173-188.
36. Maggin, D. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2010). PASS-RQ: Protocol for assessing single-subject research quality. Unpublished research instrument.
37. Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283-306.
38. Monda, L. E. (1989). The effects of oral, silent, and listening repetitive reading on the fluency and comprehension of learning disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
39. Morgan, R. T. (1976). "Paired reading" tuition: A preliminary report on a technique for cases of reading deficit. Child: Care, Health and Development, 2, 13-28.
40. Morgan, R., & Lyon, E. (1979). "Paired reading"- A preliminary report on a technique for parental tuition of reading-retarded children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20, 151-160.
41. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C.A. § 6301 et seq. (West 2003)
43. Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B. & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137-148.
44. Perie, M., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2005. (NCES Report 2006-451). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.
45. Reutzel, D. R., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders' reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 325-331.
46. Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
47. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). What doesn't work: The challenges and failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula. Educational Researcher, 35, 13-21.
48. Shany, M. T., & Biemiller, A. (1995). Assisted reading practice: Effects on performance for poor readers in grade 3 and 4. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 382-395.
49. Slavin, R. E. (1989). PET and the pendulum: Faddism in education and how to stop it. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 752-758.
50. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31, 15-21.
51. Slavin, R. E. (2008). What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14.
52. Slocum, T. A., Detrich, R., & Spencer, T. D. (2012). Evaluating the validity of systematic reviews to indentify empirically supported treatments. Education and Treatment of Children.
53. Stenhoff, D. M., & Lignugaris/Kraft, B. (2007). A review of the effects of peer tutoring on students with mild disabilities in secondary settings. Exceptional Children, 74, 8-30.
54. Stout, T. W. (1997). An investigation of the effects of a repeated reading intervention on the fluency and comprehension of students with language-learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
55. Sutton, P. A. (1991). Strategies to increase oral reading fluency of primary resource students. Unpublished manuscript, Nova University.
56. Swain, K. D., & Allinder, R. M. (1996). The effects of repeated reading on two types of CBM: Computer maze and oral reading with second-grade students with learning disabilities, Diagnostique, 21, 51-66.
57. Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252-261.
58. Vaughn, S., Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64, 211-225.
59. Wendt, O., & Miller, B. (2012). Quality appraisal of singlesubject experimental designs: An overview and comparison of different appraisal tools. Education and Treatment of Children.
60. What Works Clearinghouse. (2006). What Works Clearinghouse phonological awareness training intervention report. Retrieved January 14, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/WWC_Phonological_Awareness_121406.pdf
61. What Works Clearinghouse. (2007a). What Works Clearinghouse beginning reading topic report. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/BR_TR_08_13_07.pdf
62. What Works Clearinghouse. (2007b). What Works Clearinghouse beginning reading topic report, technical appendix. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/BR_APP_08_13_07.pdf
63. What Works Clearinghouse. (2007c). What Works Clearinghouse elementary school math topic report. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/ESM_TR_07_16_07.pdf
64. What Works Clearinghouse. (2007d). What Works Clearinghouse evidence review protocol for beginning reading interventions. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PDF/BR_protocol.pdf
65. What Works Clearinghouse. (2007e). What Works Clearinghouse middle school math topic report. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/MSM_TR_07_30_07.pdf
66. What Works Clearinghouse. (2008). Procedures and standards handbook (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19
67. Young, A. R., Bowers, P. G., & MacKinnon, G. E. (1996). Effects of prosodic modeling and repeated reading on poor readers' fluency and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 59-84.