Multiobjective nonlinear model predictive control of a class of chemical reactors

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 51, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 5891-5899

  Flores Tlacuahuac, Antonio ^a   Morales, Pilar ^a   Rivera Toledo, Martín ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARBITRARY WEIGHTING; ECONOMICAL PROFIT; ENGINEERING FIELDS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR; NONLINEAR MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS; OPTIMAL VALUES; OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; REAL TIME OPTIMAL CONTROL; REAL-TIME OPTIMIZATION; SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING; SET-POINT TRACKING; SOLUTION PROCEDURE; SUBJECTIVE WEIGHTING; SUBOPTIMAL SOLUTION; SYSTEMATIC METHOD; TARGET POINT; TRADEOFF SOLUTION; WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS;

CHEMICAL REACTORS; CHEMICALS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84860466697     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie201742e     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Engell, S. Feedback control for optimal process operation J. Process Control 2007, 17, 203-219 (Pubitemid 46205320)
2. Marlin, T.; Hrymak, A. Real-time operations optimization of continuous processes, Fifth International Conference on Chemical Process Control (CPC-5). 1996.
3. Prett, D.; Garcia, C. Fundamental Process Control; Butterworth-Heinemann: 1988.
4. Nikandrov, A.; Swartz, C. Sensitivity analysis of lp-mpc cascade control systems J. Process Control 2009, 19, 16-24
5. Biegler, L.; Zavala, V. Large-scale nonlinear programming using IPOPT: An integratingframework for enterprise-wide dynamic optimization Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33, 575-582
6. Chinchuluun, A.; Pardalos, P. A survey of recent developments in multiobjective optimization Ann. Oper. Res. 2007, 154, 29-50
7. Liu, G.; Yang, J.; Whidborne, J. Multiobjective Optimization and Control; Research Studies Press: 2003.
8. Rawlings, J. Tutorial overview of model predictive control IEEE Control Systems Magazine 2000, 38-52
9. Maciejowski, J. Predictive Control with Constraints; Prentice-Hall: 2000.
10. Biegler, L. Nonlinear Programming: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications to Chemical Processes; SIAM: 2010.
11. Das, I.; Dennis, J. A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives forpareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems Struct. Optim. 1997, 63-69 (Pubitemid 127676980)
12. Camacho, E.; Alba, C. Model Predictive Control; Springer-Verlag: 2007.
13. Rossiter, J. Model-Based Predictive Control: A Practical Approach; CRC Press: 2003.
14. Wang, Z.; Kothare, M. Efficient Robust Model Predictive Control Via Convex Optimization: Efficiently Incorporating Robustness Using Linear Matrix Inequalities; VDM Verlag: 2008.
15. Cychowski, M. Robust Model Predictive Control; VDM Verlag: 2009.
16. Findeisen, R.; Allgower, F.; Biegler, L. T. Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive Control; Springer: 2007.
17. Wang, Y.; Boyd, S. Fast model predictive control using online optimization IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2010, 18, 267-278
18. Zavala, V. Computational Strategies for the Optimal Operation of Large-Scale Chemical Processes. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2008.
19. Li, D. On the minimax solution of multiple linear-quadratic problems IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1990, 35, 1153-1156
20. Shtessel, Y. Principle of proportional damages in a multiple criteria lqr problem IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1996, 41, 461-464 (Pubitemid 126767903)
21. Karbowski, A. Optimal infinite-horizon multicriteria feedback control of stationary systems with minimax objectives and bounded disturbances. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 101.
22. Kerrigan, E.; Maciejowski, J. Designing model predictive controllers with prioritised constraintsand objectives, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Symposium on ComputerAided Control System Design. 2002.
23. Zambrano, D.; Camacho, E. Applications of mpc with multiple objective for a solar refrigeration plant, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. 2002.
24. Halsall-Whitney, H.; Thibault, J. Multi-objective optimization for chemical processes and controller design: Approximating and classifying the pareto domain Comput. Chem. Eng. 2006, 30, 1155-1168
25. Gambier, A.; Badreddin, E. Multi-objective optimal control: An overview, Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. 2007.
26. Gambier, A. MPC and PID control based on multi-objective optimization, Proceedings of the 2008 American Control Conference. 2008.
27. De Vito, D.; Scattolini, R. A receding horizon approach to themultiobjective control problem, Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 2007.
28. Magni, L.; Scattolini, R.; Tanelli, M. Switched model predictive control for performanceenhancement Int. J. Control 2008, 81, 1859-1869
29. Bemporad, A.; Munoz de la Pena, D. Multiobjective model predictive control Automatica 2009, 45, 2823-2830
30. Logist, F.; Sager, S.; Kirches, C.; Van Impe, J. Efficient multiple objective optimal control ofdynamic systems with integer controls J. Process Control 2010, 20, 810-822
31. Grossmann, I. Review of NonlinearMixed-Integer and Disjunctive Programming Techniques Optim. Eng. 2002, 3, 227-252
32. Bemporad, A.; Morari, M. Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints Automatica 1999, 35, 407-427
33. Tyler, M.; Morari, M. Propositional Logic in Control and Monitoring Problems Automatica 1999, 35, 565-582
34. Gatzke, E.; Doyle, F. J. Multi-Objective Control of a Granulation System J. Powder Technol. 2001, 121, 149-158
35. Mayne, D.; Rawlings, J.; Rao, C. V.; Scokaert, P. O. Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality Automatica 2000, 789-814 (Pubitemid 30587683)
36. Ray, W. H. Polymerization Reactor Control IEEE Control Systems Magazine 1986, xx, xxxx
37. Seider, W.; Brengel, D.; Provost, A.; Widagdo, S. Nonlinear Analysis in Process Design.Why Overdesign To Avoid Complex Nonlinearities? Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1990, 29, 805
38. Congalidis, J. P.; Richards, J. R.; Ray, H. W. Scheduling of Polymer Grade Transitions AIChE J. 2002, 48 (8) 1754-1764
39. Vafaeyan, V.; Thibault, J. Selection of pareto-optimal solutions for process optimization usingrough set method: A new approach Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 30, 1155-1168
40. Grossmann, I. E.; Drabbant, R.; Jain, R. K. Incorporating toxicology in the synthesis ofindustrial chemical complexes Chem. Eng. Commun. 1982, 17, 151-170
41. Haimes, Y.; Lasdon, L.; Wismer, D. On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of IntegratedSystem Identification and System Optimization IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics 1971, 296-297
42. Das, I.; Dennis, J. Normal-Bundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating the ParetoSurface in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems SIAM J. Optim. 1998, 8, 631-657
43. Huang, R.; Harinath, E.; Biegler, L. Lyapunov stability of economically oriented NMPC forcyclic processes J. Process Control 2011, 21, 501-509
44. Biegler, L. An overview of simultaneous strategies for dynamic optimization Chem. Eng. Process. 2007, 46, 1043-1053 (Pubitemid 47361459)
45. Terwiesch, P.; Ravemark, D.; Schenker, B.; Rippin, D. Semi-batch process optimization underuncertainty: Theory and experiments Comput. Chem. Eng. 1998, 22, 201-213
46. Mukherjee, A.; Zhang, J. A reliable multi-objective control strategy for batch process basedon bootstrap aggregated neural newtwork models J. Process Control 2008, 18, 720-734