Fast-TIPL occurs for salient images without a memorization requirement in men but not in women

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Leclercq, Virginie ^a   Seitz, Aaron R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; EXPLICIT MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK IRRELEVANT PERCEPTUAL LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ATTENTION; MEMORY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860454321     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036228     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. DeSchepper B, Treisman A, (1996) Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. J Exp Psychol Learn 22: 27-47.
2. Schacter DL, Dobbins IG, Schnyer DM, (2004) Specificity of priming: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nat Neuroscience Rev 5: 853-862.
3. Seitz A, Watanabe T, (2005) A unified model for perceptual learning. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 329-334.
4. Seitz AR, Dinse HR, (2007) A common framework for perceptual learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17: 148-153.
5. Seitz AR, Watanabe T, (2009) The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning. Vision Res 49: 2604-2610.
6. Watanabe T, Nanez JE, Sasaki Y, (2001) Perceptual learning without perception. Nature 413: 844-848.
7. Seitz AR, Watanabe T, (2003) Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive? Nature 422: 36.
8. Watanabe T, Nanez JE, Koyama S, Mukai I, Liederman J, et al. (2002) Greater plasticity in lower-level than higher-level visual motion processing in a passive perceptual learning task. Nat Neurosci 5: 1003-1009.
9. Roelfsema PR, van Ooyen A, Watanabe T, (2010) Perceptual learning rules based on reinforcers and attention. Trends Cogn Sci 14: 64-71.
10. Tsushima Y, Sasaki Y, Watanabe T, (2006) Greater disruption due to failure of inhibitory control on an ambiguous distractor. Science 314: 1786-1788.
11. Tsushima Y, Seitz AR, Watanabe T, (2008) Task-irrelevant learning occurs only when the irrelevant feature is weak. Curr Biol 18: R516-517.
12. Choi H, Seitz AR, Watanabe T, (2009) When attention interrupts learning: inhibitory effects of attention on TIPL. Vision Res 49: 2586-2590.
13. Leclercq V, Seitz AR, (2011) Central task reinforces processing of target-paired images only when distractors are presented. Vision Res 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.017.
14. Lin JY, Pype AD, Murray SO, Boynton GM, (2010) Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time. PLoS Biol 8: e1000337.
15. Swallow KM, Jiang YV, (2010) The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task. Cognition 115: 118-132.
16. Swallow KM, Jiang YV, (2011) The role of timing in the attentional boost effect. Atten Percept Psycho 73: 389-404.
17. Dewald AD, Sinnett S, Doumas LAA, (2011) Conditions of directed attention inhibit recognition performance for explicitly presented target-aligned irrelevant stimuli. Acta Psychol in press.
18. Brainard DH, (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10: 433-436.
19. Pelli DG, (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10: 437-442.
20. Oliva A, Torralba A, (2001) Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int J Comput Vision 42: 145-175.
21. Leclercq V, Seitz AR, (2012) The impact of orienting attention in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning. Atten Percept Psycho in press.
22. Wise R, (2004) Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nat Neuroscience Rev 5: 483-494.
23. Dalley JW, McGaughy J, O'Connell MT, Cardinal RN, Levita L, et al. (2001) Distinct changes in cortical acetylcholine and noradrenaline efflux during contingent and noncontingent performance of a visual attentional task. J Neurosci 21: 4908-4914.
24. Tully K, Bolshakov VY, (2010) Emotional enhancement of memory: how norepinephrine enables synaptic plasticity. Mol Brain 13: 15-23.
25. Rokem A, Silver MA, (2010) Cholinergic enhancement augments magnitude and specificity of visual perceptual learning in healthy humans. Curr Biol 20: 1723-1728.
26. Wilson DA, Fletcher ML, Sullivan RM, (2004) Acetylcholine and olfactory perceptual learning. Learn Memory 11: 28-34.
27. Bear MF, Singer W, (1986) Modulation of visual cortical plasticity by acetylcholine and noradrenaline. Nature 320: 172-176.
28. Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM, (1998) Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science 279: 1714-1718.
29. Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM, (2002) Order-sensitive plasticity in adult primary auditory cortex. PNAS 99: 3205-3209.
30. Bao S, Chan VT, Merznich MM, (2001) Cortical remodelling induced by activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons. Nature 412: 79-81.
31. Urban NB, Kegeles LS, Slifstein M, Xu X, Martinez D, et al. (2010) Sex differences in striatal dopamine release in young adults after oral alcohol challenge: a positron emission tomography imaging study with [11C]raclopride. Bio Psychiatry 68: 689-96.
32. Kimchi R, Amishav R, Sulitzeanu-Kenan A, (2009) Gender differences in global-local perception? Evidence from orientation and shape judgments. Acta Psychol 130: 64-71.