The first appearance of symmetry in the human lineage: Where perception meets art

Symmetry

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 37-53

  Hodgson, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evolution; Neuropsychology; Proto art; Symmetrical tools; Visual brain

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860450610     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20738994     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/sym3010037     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Lycett, S.J.; Gowlett, A.J. On questions surrounding the Acheulean "tradition" World Archaeol. 2008, 40, 295-315.
2. Schmidt, R.R. The Dawn of the Human Min; Sidgwick & Jackson: London, UK, 1936.
3. Schick K.D.; Toth, N. Making Silent Stones Speak: Human Evolution and the Dawn of Human Technology; Weidenfeld and Nicolson: London, UK, 1993.
4. Wynn, T. Archaeology and cognitive evolution. Behav. Brain Sci. 2002, 25,389-438
5. Wynn, T. The Large Cutting Tools from the South African Acheulean and the Question of Social Traditions. Curr. Anthropol. 2004, 45, 672-673.
6. Nowell, A. Coincidental factors of handaxe morphology. Behav. Brain Sci. 2002, 25, 413-414.
7. Toth, N. The Prehistoric Roots of a Human Concept of Symmetry. Symmetry Cult. Sci. 1990, 1, 257-281.
8. Rensch, B. Die Wirksankeit äesthetischer Faktoren bei Wirbeltieren. Z. Tierpsychol 1958, 15, 447-461.
9. Baylis, G.C.; Driver, J. Perception of symmetry and repetition within and across visual shapes: Part-descriptions and object-based-attention. Vis. Cogn. 2001, 8, 163-196.
10. Dragoi, V.; Turcu, C.M.; Sur, M. Stability of cortical responses and the statistics of natural scenes. Neuron 2001, 32, 1181-1192.
11. van der Helm, P.A.; Leeuwenberg, E.L.J. Goodness nontransformational approach. Psychol. Rev. 1996, 103, 429-456.
12. van der Helm, P.A.; Leeuwenberg, E.L.J. Accessibility, a criterion for regularity and hierarchy in visual pattern codes. J. Math. Psychol. 1991, 35, 151-213.
13. van der Helm, P.A. Natural selection of visual symmetries. Behav. Brain Sci. 2002, 25, 422-423; 432-438.
14. Enquist, M.E.; Arak, A. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 1994, 372, 169-172.
15. Giurfa., M.; Eichmann, B.; Menzel, R. Symmetry perception in an insect. Nature 1996, 382, 458-546.
16. Wagemans, J. Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1997, 1, 346-352.
17. Tyler, C.W.; Baseler, H.A.; Kontsevich, L.L.; Likova, L.T.; Wade, A.R.; Wandell, B.A. Predominantly extra-retinotopic cortical response to pattern symmetry. NeuroImage 2005, 24, 306-314.
18. Redies, C.; Hasenstein, J.; Denzler, J. Fractal-like image statistics in visual art: similarity to natural scenes. Spatial Vis. 2007, 21, 137-148.
19. Liu, Z.; Kersten, D. Three-dimensional symmetric shapes are discriminated more efficiently than asymmetric ones. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 2003, 20, 1331-40.
20. Vetter, T; Poggio, T; Bültoff, H.H. The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition. Curr. Biol. 1994, 4, 18-23.
21. Tyler, C.W. The Perception of Symmetry and its Computational Analysis; Erlbaum: NJ, USA, 1996.
22. Tyler, C.W; Baseler, H.A.; Kontsevich, L.L.; Likova, L.T.; Wade, A.R.; Wandell, B.A. Predominantly extra-retinotopic cortical response to pattern symmetry. NeuroImage 2005, 24, 306-314.
23. Sasaki, Y.; Vanduffel, W.; Knutsen, T.; Tyler, C.; Tootell, R. Symmetry activates extrastriate visual cortex in human and nonhuman primates. PNAS 2005, 102, 3159-3163.
24. Sasaki, Y. Processing local signals into global patterns. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17, 132-139.
25. Tyler, C.W. Empirical aspects of symmetry perception. Spatial Vis. 1995, 9, 1-7
26. Barlow, H.B.; Reeves, B.C. The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Res. 1979, 19, 783-793.
27. Beck, D.M.; Pinsk, M.A.; Kastner S. Symmetry perception in humans and macaques. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9, 405-406.
28. Julesz, B. Figure and ground perception in briefly presented isodipole textures. In Perceptual Organization; Kubouy, M., Pomerantz, J., Eds.; Erlbaum: NJ, USA, 1981; pp. 27-54.
29. Rentschler, I.; Jüttner, M.; Unzicker, A.; Landis, T. Innate and learned components of human visual preference. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 665-671.
30. Locher, P.J.; Wagemans, J. Effects of element type and spatial grouping on symmetry detection. Perception 1993, 22, 565-587.
31. Humphrey, G.K.; Humphrey, D.E. The role of structure in infant visual pattern perception. Can. J. Psychol. 1989, 43, 165-182.
32. Stucchi, N.; Graciô, V.; Toneatto, C.; Scocchi, L. The perceptual salience of symmetrical and asymmetrical sections of a line. Perception 2010, 39, 1026-1042.
33. Treder, M.S. Behind the Looking-Glass: A Review on Human Symmetry Perception. Symmetry 2010, 2, 1510-1543.
34. Goren-Inbar, N.; Sharon, G. Axe Age: Acheulian Tool-making from Quarry to Discard; Equinox: London, UK, 2006.
35. McNabb, J.; Binyon, F.; Hazelwood. L. The Large Cutting Tools from the South African Acheulean and the Question of Social Traditions. Curr. Anthropol. 2004, 41, 653-677.
36. Brumm, A.; McLaren, A. Scraper reduction and "imposed form" at the Lower Palaeolithic site of High Lodge, England. J. Hum. Evol. 2010, 2, 185-204.
37. McPherron, S.P. Handaxes as a measure of the mental capabilities of early hominids. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2000, 27, 655-663.
38. White. M.J. On the significance of Acheulean bifaces variability in Southern Britain. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 1998, 64, 15-44.
39. Machin, A.J.; Hosfield, R.T; Mithen. S.J. Why are some handaxes symmetrical? Testing the influence of handaxe morphology on effectiveness. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2007, 34, 883-893.
40. Le Tensorer, J.M. Les cultures acheuléennes et la question de l'émergence de la pensée symbolique chez Homo erectus à partir des données relatives à la forme symétrique et harmonique des bifaces. C. R. Palevol. 2006, 5, 135-172.
41. Wenban-Smith, F.F. Biface Typology and Lower Paleolithic Cultural Development: Ficrons, Cleavers and Two Giant Bifaces from Cuxton. Lithics 2004, 25, 11-21.
42. Mallol, C. The Selection of Lithic Raw Material in the Lower and Middle Pleistocene Levels TD6 and TD10 of Gran Dolina (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain). J. Anthropol. Res. 1999, 55, 385-407.
43. Saragusti, I.; Karasik, A.; Sharon, I.; Smilansky. U. Symmetry and roughness of pre-historical tools: Archaeological evidence on the development of the human capability to produce symmetric and smooth-edged tools during the Lower Paleolithic. Presented at Kimmel Centre for archaeological studies, the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel, 2004.
44. Illustration from the McGregor Museum, Kimberley. Photo Michael Cope©.
45. Illustration from Marshall, G.D., Gamble, C.G., Roe, D.A., and Dupplaw, D. 2002. Acheulian biface database, Available at: http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/specColl/bifaces/bf_query.cfm ADS, York. (Accessed on 20 February 2011)
46. Kohn, M.; Mithen, S.; Handaxes: products of sexual selection? Antiquity 1999, 73, 518-526.
47. Machin, A.J. Why Bifaces Just Aren't That Sexy: A Response to Kohn and Mithen (1999), Antiquity 2008, 82, 761-769. 48
48. Nowell, A.; Chang, M.L. The case against sexual selection as an explanation of handaxe morphology. Paleoanthropology 2009, 77-88. Available at: http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/contents_dynamic.asp?volume=2009 (Accessed on November 3, 2010).
49. Hodgson, D. Symmetry and humans: Reply to Mithen's "Sexy Handaxe Theory" . Antiquity 2009, 83, 195-198.
50. Hodgson, D. Another side of symmetry: the Acheulean biface debate. Antiquity 2010, 84, 325.
51. Enquist, M.; Johnstone, R.A. Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1997, 264, 1345-1348.
52. Grill-Spector, K.; Kushnir, T.; Edelman, S.; Avidan, G.; Itzchak, Y.; Malach, R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24, 187-203.
53. Denys, K., Vanduffel, W.; Fize, D.; Nelissen, K.; Peuskens, H.; Van Essen, D.; Orban, G.A. The Processing of Visual Shape in the Cerebral Cortex of Human and Nonhuman Primates: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 2551-2565.
54. Orban, G.A., Van Essen, D.; Vanduffel. W. Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8, 315-324.
55. Orban, G.A., Sunaert, S.; Todd, J.T.; van Hecke P.; Marchal, G. Human cortical regions involved in extracting depth from motion. Neuron 1999, 24, 929-940.
56. Orban, G.A.; Claeys, K.; Nelissen, K.; Smans, R.; Sunaert, S.; Todd, J.T. Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates. Neuropsychol 2006, 44, 2647-2667.
57. Hodgson, D. Hominin Tool Production, Neural Integration, and the Social Brain. Hum. Origins 2011, in press.
58. Vanduffel, W.; Fize, D.; Peuskens, H.; Denys, K.; Sunaert, S.; Todd, J.T.; Orban, G.A. Extracting 3D from motion: Differences in human and monkey intraparietal cortex. Science 2002, 298, 413-415.
59. Schendan, H.E.; Stern, C.E. Mental rotation and object categorization share a common network of prefrontal and dorsal and ventral regions of posterior cortex. NeuroImage 2007, 35, 1264-1277.
60. Jacobsen, T.; Schubotz, R.I.; Höfel, L.; van Cramon, D.Y. Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage 2006, 29, 276-285.
61. Tzagarakis, C.; Trenton A.; Jerde, T.A.; Lewis, S.M.; Uǧurbil, K.; Georgopoulos. A.P. Cerebral cortical mechanisms of copying geometrical shapes: a multidimensional scaling analysis of fMRI patterns of activation. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 194, 369-380.
62. Nakahara, K.; Adachi, Y.; Osada, T.; Miyashita, Y.; Exploring the neural basis of cognition: multi-modal links between human fMRI and macaque neurophysiology, Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11, 84-92
63. Stout, D.; Chaminade. T. The evolutionary neuroscience of toolmaking. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45, 1091-1100.
64. Peeters, R.; Simone, L.; Nelissen, K.; Fabbri-Destro, M.; Vanduffel, W.; Rizzolatti, G.; Orban, G.A. The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 11523-11539.
65. Gallese, V. The Inner Sense of Action. J. Conscious. Stud. 2000, 10, 23-40.
66. Johnson-Frey, S.H.; Newman-Norland, R.; Grafton, S.T. A distributed Left Hemisphere Network Active During Planning of Everyday Tool Use Skills. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15, 681-695.
67. Frey, S.H. Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol Sci. 2008, 363, 1951-1957.
68. Ramayya, A.G.; Glasser, M.F.; Rilling, J.K. A DTI Investigation of Neural Substrates Supporting Tool Use. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20, 507-516.
69. Read, D.; van der Leeuw, S. Biology is only part of the story. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 2008, 363, 1959-1968.
70. Keller, O. Aux Origines de la Géométrie-Le Paléolithique; Vuibert: Paris, France, 2004.
71. Reber, R.; Winkielman, P.; Schwarz, N. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgements. Psychol. Sci. 1998, 9, 45-48.
72. Reber, R.; Schwarz, N.; Winkielman, P. Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 8, 364.
73. Hodgson, D. Evolution of the visual cortex and the emergence of symmetry in the Acheulean techno-complex. C. R. Palevol. 2009, 8, 93-97.
74. Verpooten, J.; Nelissen, M. Sensory exploitation and cultural transmission: the late emergence of iconic representations in human evolution. Theory Biosci. 2010, 129, 211-221.
75. Grill-Spector, K.; Henson, R.; Martin, A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulusspecific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10, 14-23.
76. Supér, H.; van der Togt, C.; Spekreijse, H.; Lamme, V.A.F. Internal State of Monkey Primary Visual Cortex (V1) Predicts Figure-Ground Perception. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 3407-3414.
77. Posner, M.I.; Keele, S.W. On the genesis of abstract ideas. J. Exp. Psychol. 1968, 77, 353-363.
78. Zajonc, R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1968, 9, 1-27.
79. Zajonc, R.B. Emotions. In The Handbook of Social Psychology; Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., Lindzey, G., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA, USA, 1998; pp. 591-632.
80. Tinio, P.P.L.; Leder, H. Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Psychologica. 2009, 130 241-250.
81. Zaidel, D.W.; Hessamian, M. Asymmetry and Symmetry in the Beauty of Human Faces. Symmetry 2010, 2, 136-149.
82. Fechner, G.T. Vorschule der Äesthtik; Breitkopf & Härtel: Leipzig, Germany, 1876.
83. Berlyne, D.E. Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1960.
84. Abraham, F.D.; Sprott, J.C.; Mitina, O.; Osorio, M.; Dequito, E.A.; Pinili, J.M. Judgments of Time, Aesthetics, and Complexity as a Function of The Fractal Dimension of Images formed by Chaotic Attractors. Available at: http://www.blueberry-brain.org/silliman/JEM%20ms4.htm (Accessed on December 2010)
85. Jacobsen, T.; Höfel, L. Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cogn. Affect Behav. Neurosci. 2003, 3, 289-299.
86. Redies, C. A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spatial Vis. 2007, 21, 97-117.
87. Halberstadt, J. The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2006, 10, 166-183.
88. Machin, A. The role of the individual agent in Acheulean biface variability-a multi-factorial model. J. Soc. Archaeol. 2009, 9, 35-58.
89. McNabb, J. The visual display hypothesis. Hum. Origins 2011, in press.
90. Pope, M.; Russel, K.; Watson, K. Biface form and structured behaviour in the Acheulean. Lithic Studies Soc. 2006, 27, 44-57.
91. Pope, M.I.; Roberts, M.B. Observations on the relationship between individuals and artefact scatters at the Middle Palaeolithic site of Boxgrove, West Sussex. In The Hominid Individual in Context: Archaeological Investigations of Lower & Middle Palaeolithic Landscapes, Locales & Artefacts; Gamble, C., Porr, M., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2005; pp. 81-97.
92. Höfel, L.; Jacobsen, T. Electrophysiological Indices of Processing Symmetry and Aesthetics: A Result of Judgment Categorization or Judgment Report? J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21, 9-21.
93. Wymer. J. Lower Palaeolithic archaeology in Britain; John Baker: London, UK, 1968.
94. Wymer, J. The Palaeolithic Age; Croom Helm: London, UK, 1983.
95. Roe, D. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic periods in Britain. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, UK, 1981.
96. Photo J. Wymer© 1982. Plate XIII. The palaeolithic age. New York: St. Martins (with permission of the Natural History Museum, London).
97. Radomsky, A.S.; Rachman, S. Symmetry, ordering and arranging compulsive behaviour. Behav. Res. Therapy 2004, 42, 893-913.
98. Dulaney, S.; Fiske, A.P. Cultural rituals and obsessive-compulsive disorder: Is there a common psychological mechanism? Ethos 1994, 22, 243-283.
99. Fiske, A.P.; Haslam, N. Is obsessive-compulsive disorder of the human disposition to perform socially meaningful rituals? Evidence of similar content. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1997, 185, 211-223.
100. Hodgson, D. Art, Perception and Information Processing: An evolutionary Perspective. Rock Art Res. 2000, 17, 3-34.
101. From, Marshall, G.D., Gamble, C.G., Roe, D.A. and Dupplaw, D. 2002. Acheulian biface database. Available at: http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/specColl/bifaces/bf_query.cfm, ADS, York.
102. Batchelor, R.K. Evolution, Artefacts, Meaning and Design: The extent to which evolutionary theory can explain how and why humans attribute significance and meaning to the material world and the consequences of this for understanding design. Doctoral Dissertation. London, UK, 2004. Available at: http://dspace.bucks.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/10239/127/1/01Prelims.pdf. (Accessed on December 2010).
103. Dissanayake, E. Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes From and Why; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992104.
104. Dissanyake, E. The Deep Structure of Pleistocene Rock Art: The "Artification Hypothesis" IFRAO Congress. Pleistocene art of the world-Symposium: Signs, symbols, myth, ideology (Pre-Acts), 2010. Available at: http://www.ifraoariege2010.fr/docs/Articles/Dissanayake-Signes.pdf (Accessed on November 1, 2010).
105. Oakley, K. Skill as a human possession. In Perspectives on Human Evolution; Washburn S.L., Dolhinow, P., Eds.; Holt, Rinehart, and Winston: New York, NY, USA, 1972; pp. 14-50.
106. Edwards, S.W. Acheulean Evidence. Rock Art Res. 2003, 20, 109-111.